The episode explores whether potential charges could ever materialise, with Arbiter warning that misconduct in public office is notoriously difficult to prove and could take years to resolve. The conversation also digs into speculation around corruption allegations, the role of the CPS in guiding police, and whether historic royal legal precedents could offer Andrew any protection in court.

Jeremy Kyle also presses on the wider Royal implications, including the position of King Charles III and whether continued financial support risks reputational fallout. Arbiter offers insight into the strained relationship behind palace doors, suggesting ties remain but are deeply fractured. Listen to The Royal Tea on Talk for sharp analysis, insider context and the latest Royal developments.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The conversation also explores reports surrounding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, including suggestions they would welcome reconciliation with the Royal Family. Contributors analyse how such claims are communicated publicly, noting these are based on media reports and commentary rather than confirmed plans. There is further discussion about stories involving Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, with caution raised around unverified reports and the possibility of speculation.

Attention then turns to scrutiny surrounding Prince Andrew and his past association with Jeffrey Epstein. Guests stress the importance of distinguishing allegation from proven fact, highlighting ongoing public concern about transparency and accountability within the monarchy. Featuring analysis from Angela Levin and Robert Jobson, this episode breaks down the key royal headlines while keeping firmly within the bounds of verified information and responsible reporting.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This episode breaks down the key questions surrounding royal finances, including the Civil List, Duchy income and allegations of hidden wealth, gifts and overseas business dealings. The discussion examines whether Prince Andrew’s scandal has triggered wider concerns about how members of the Royal Family make money, and whether Beatrice and Eugenie’s associations could deepen the crisis. There is also analysis of King Charles’ slimmed-down monarchy plan and whether it can withstand continued reputational damage.

Featuring Rupert Bell and Dai Davies, this is a sharp, no-nonsense look at the Prince Andrew scandal, Epstein fallout and the future of the Royal Family. Listen on Talk to hear why transparency, accountability and public trust are now the defining battle for the monarchy.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

And as news breaks that Beatrice and Eugenie won't be joining the Royals at Easter - where in the world is Sarah Ferguson?

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The discussion lays bare deep tensions behind the scenes, with Levin suggesting financial motives could be driving Harry’s reported desire to return, while also highlighting ongoing disputes over security, media leaks and past interviews. She points to concerns inside the Palace that any private conversation could be made public, alongside claims that Meghan is still demanding an apology and unwilling to return to the UK, further complicating any potential reconciliation.

Levin also reflects on her time with Prince Harry before Meghan entered his life, describing a very different figure to the one seen today. She argues that change, combined with ongoing public attacks and media strategy, has left the Royal Family wary of any renewed contact.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The episode explores the key revelations, including Ferguson’s contact with Epstein after his conviction, financial links, and claims she introduced her daughters into his social orbit. There’s also focus on the wider institutional response — from York councillors stressing “standards over criminality” to the symbolic but powerful removal of honours previously held by both Ferguson and Prince Andrew. Samara also outlines the growing pressure from the United States for testimony, alongside reports of charities closing and business interests winding down.

The conversation also digs into the Sussexes’ upcoming trip, including a women-only retreat appearance in Sydney, questions over who funds their security, and a petition from thousands of Australians demanding taxpayers don’t foot the bill.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Schofield lays out a blunt assessment of the Sussex strategy, linking the acting rumours to fallout from Tom Bower’s Betrayal and mounting criticism in the US media. The discussion also tears into claims of a new polo-themed Netflix project, with both interviews questioning whether it’s genuine or simply “smoke and mirrors” designed to counter damaging headlines about their lack of output and strained industry relationships.

The episode widens into a full-scale takedown of the Sussex brand — from backlash over their Australia visit and accusations of “cash-for-appearance” tours, to growing scrutiny over their media tactics and constant rebuttals of criticism.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Angela Levin delivers a scathing assessment, accusing Meghan of blatant hypocrisy by criticising platforms like Instagram while активно using them to promote her brand and feature her children. The discussion zeroes in on claims that Archie and Lilibet are regularly used in curated posts, despite Harry’s public warnings about the dangers of children being exposed online. Levin also questions inconsistencies between the couple’s public messaging on safeguarding and their private conduct.

The conversation escalates into a broader critique of the Sussexes’ parenting, public image and credibility — from claims of “double standards” to scrutiny over their family setup and media strategy. With fresh controversy surrounding Tom Bower’s new book Betrayal, this episode cuts through the headlines to ask: are Harry and Meghan saying one thing and doing another — and is the public finally turning?

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The conversation turns sharply to Meghan’s commercial ventures, including a reported £1,700 wellness event, with Kyle questioning whether her brand is slipping into celebrity-for-hire territory. Levin delivers a blunt assessment of Meghan’s character, describing her as “cunning” and alleging a pattern of controlling behaviour, while raising concerns about staff turnover and tensions behind closed doors.

They also debate Prince Harry’s role in the relationship, with Levin claiming he is “terrified” and increasingly isolated, alongside criticism of the couple’s decision to monetise their royal status through media deals with platforms like Spotify. The episode paints a picture of a deeply fractured royal dynamic, with mounting public scepticism over the Sussexes’ credibility and motives.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The episode digs into Harry and Meghan’s fallout with Prince William and Princess Kate, the collapse of trust between the Sussexes and the wider Royal Family, and why both Jeremy and Bower believe the public has turned on them. They also examine whether Harry really wants to return to Britain, why Invictus and security rows matter, and how Meghan’s commercial ventures are fuelling fresh questions over status, money and the use of royal titles.

It then widens into the Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor scandal, with Jeremy pressing Bower on King Charles, transparency, and the growing damage Andrew continues to inflict on the monarchy. From Charles’s handling of his brother to whether William and Kate may eventually be forced into a harder line, this is a sharp, search-friendly episode packed with royal crisis, family betrayal and a grim warning about the future fight to save the House of Windsor.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Kinsey Schofield delivers a blunt assessment of Andrew’s future, arguing he must “disappear” as scrutiny intensifies over his lack of remorse and continued links to Jeffrey Epstein. She also lifts the lid on Sarah Ferguson’s reported reality TV ambitions involving the Queen’s corgis, while highlighting mounting pressure on Princess Beatrice and Eugenie as the scandal engulfs the wider family. Meanwhile, Meghan Markle’s planned Australian expansion sparks backlash, with polling suggesting overwhelming public rejection and fresh criticism of her commercial ventures.

Angela Levin doubles down on the criticism, branding Meghan’s strategy a calculated “cash grab” and questioning the sustainability of her growing list of business projects. She also weighs in on Andrew’s long-term future, suggesting he and Fergie could retreat abroad, while offering insight into Prince William’s evolving role and his candid comments on faith. It’s a sharp, no-holds-barred breakdown of a monarchy still battling scandal, image crises and internal pressure.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The discussion turns to the wider Royal Family, with explosive claims about why King Charles III may be keeping his brother close, including fears over what Andrew could reveal if pushed. The episode explores whether royal protection is tipping into reputational risk, and what it means for public trust as scrutiny intensifies around the monarchy’s handling of the scandal.

They also take on Meghan Markle, as reports swirl about a potential return to acting following setbacks in media deals. With sharp criticism of her popularity in both the UK and Hollywood, the hosts question whether any comeback is realistic — or simply another misreading of public sentiment.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The discussion zeroes in on backlash from Australia, with polling suggesting overwhelming disinterest in the Sussexes’ return. Kinsey reveals industry insight from media contacts Down Under, while Kevin argues the couple are attempting to monetise a “pretend royal tour” through paid appearances and product launches. There’s also scrutiny of Meghan’s “As Ever” brand — from pricey jam claims to a pivot towards homeware after reported Netflix frustrations.

They also tackle fresh controversy around Sarah Ferguson, after reports she explored a reality TV show involving cloning the Queen’s corgis. From royal reputation damage to money-making schemes, this episode is packed with sharp analysis, insider detail and no-holds-barred opinion on a monarchy increasingly entangled in celebrity and commerce.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The interview also digs into Meghan Markle’s influence over Harry, with Bower alleging she drove the decision to leave Britain and fuelled his grievances with the Royal Family. He describes her as ambitious but struggling to sustain global success, while raising questions about the couple’s long-term future, security costs and whether their income can keep pace with their lifestyle.

Separately, Rupert Bell reacts to Prince William saying he is not a devout Christian, arguing the future king is signalling a more personal, modern approach to faith. The discussion examines how that fits with his role as head of the Church of England, and whether the monarchy is adapting to reflect declining church attendance in the UK.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The discussion turns to life in California, where Harry’s relevance appears to be slipping and scrutiny of Meghan Markle is intensifying. Claims of control behind the scenes, faltering media deals and a shrinking influence in Hollywood all point to a couple struggling to maintain their position — with tensions over image, privacy and public perception now impossible to ignore.

Meanwhile, Prince Andrew’s isolation at Sandringham deepens as fresh allegations and widening investigations threaten further damage to the Royal Family. As pressure builds on King Charles to contain the fallout, this episode examines how one crisis after another is testing the stability, reputation and future of the monarchy.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

They discuss the fallout from the piece, what it revealed about Meghan's As Ever brand and the couple's interactions with Netflix executives, the couple's failed attempts to get new projects off the ground, - and what's coming next with their 'Royal tour' to Australia.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Following a damning report in Variety, the panel examine claims that Netflix has finally lost patience with the Sussexes after failed projects, poor communication and millions of dollars’ worth of unsold stock. With Hollywood insiders reportedly cooling on the couple, questions are mounting over whether their brand has run out of road.

The discussion also explores Meghan’s business ventures, repeated allegations about working relationships and the couple’s increasingly commercial “royal-style” tours — with claims they are now relying on paid appearances to sustain their lifestyle. As their popularity wanes and opportunities shrink, Kevin, Ash and Samara ask whether this is the moment the Sussex dream finally unravels — and what’s left when the spotlight fades.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

With Thames Valley Police now exploring whether offences may date back years, the pressure on the King’s brother is intensifying. The discussion breaks down what the expanded probe could mean, how long any potential case might take to reach court and the very real prospect that Andrew could face criminal charges if evidence is found.

The episode also examines the wider implications for the monarchy, including questions over financial arrangements, royal titles and the long term reputational damage to King Charles III and the institution itself. As Andrew retreats from public life and relocates within the Sandringham estate, Rupert and Michael assess whether this marks a turning point in one of the most serious royal scandals in modern history — and how far it could still go.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Following a string of brutal reports from major US publications, the pair examine claims of poor behaviour in meetings, creative clashes and a lack of output that has left streaming bosses frustrated. With projects stalling and Hollywood interest fading, questions are mounting over whether the Sussex brand still carries any real weight.

The discussion also turns to Meghan’s reported business missteps, tensions behind the scenes and claims the couple are now relying on paid appearances and events to fund their lifestyle. As their popularity dips and opportunities dry up, Kevin and Kinsey ask whether this is the end of the Sussexes’ Hollywood ambitions — and what comes next for the couple once courted by the world’s biggest media players.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The episode also digs into the growing questions over Harry and Meghan’s finances, from their Montecito lifestyle and security bills to claims they may need millions each year just to stand still. With Meghan now linked to a paid luxury wellness event in Australia and Harry continuing to make high-fee appearances, the panel asks whether the Sussexes are now reduced to cashing in on their royal status while insisting they want nothing to do with the monarchy.

Plus, there is fresh analysis of the couple’s latest quasi-royal Australia trip, why Buckingham Palace will be watching closely, and whether the Sussex brand has become toxic on both sides of the Atlantic. If Netflix is truly done, where do Harry and Meghan go next, and how much more reputational damage can the Royal Family take along the way?

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Dickie Arbiter, who worked closely with Queen Elizabeth II, gives a blunt assessment of the Duke of York — describing him as arrogant, deceitful and impossible to deal with — but insists the scandal threatens the family more than the monarchy itself. He explains why stripping Andrew from the line of succession is far more complicated than many people believe, requiring an Act of Parliament and agreement across the Commonwealth realms.

Plus, Peter Cardwell speaks to Talk's Royal Correspondent Rupert Bell about the political pressures facing King Charles as tensions grow between Britain and the United States. With questions swirling around whether the King’s planned state visit to Washington should go ahead during a global crisis, the panel explores the delicate role of the Royal Family in diplomacy — and whether the monarchy is once again being forced to steady Britain’s relationship with America.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The podcast also examines Harry and Meghan’s latest money-spinning trip to Australia, where Meghan is reportedly charging thousands for luxury events and “fireside chats”. Charlie Rae and Kevin O’Sullivan ask whether the Sussexes’ unofficial tours are damaging the monarchy’s reputation, as the King’s second son and daughter-in-law continue to trade on royal status while living in California.

Attention then turns to the deepening Epstein scandal and the York family, with fresh scrutiny on Sarah Ferguson, Prince Andrew and their daughters Beatrice and Eugenie. With new revelations emerging and senior royals reportedly distancing themselves, this episode asks whether the fallout from the Epstein files could cause lasting damage to the Royal Family’s reputation.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The podcast also turns to the deepening Prince Andrew scandal, with renewed scrutiny on Sarah Ferguson, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie. Rupert Bell, Angela Levin and former head of Royal Protection Dai Davies discuss the claims surrounding royal homes, money, palace perks and whether King Charles is now trying to distance the monarchy from the York family as the Epstein fallout worsens.

There is also debate over the King’s proposed state visit to the United States, whether it could become politically toxic, and what the Andrew affair means for the long-term future of the monarchy. With tough questions over accountability, royal privilege and public trust, this episode of Royal Tea looks at whether the institution can contain the damage — or whether the crisis is still growing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The panel discusses reports that Meghan Markle will headline a paid luxury wellness retreat in Australia, where guests can pay thousands for a three-day event featuring yoga sessions, “sound healing”, and a Q&A with the Duchess of Sussex. Commentators question whether the event signals financial pressure following Netflix’s decision to step back from Meghan’s lifestyle brand and media projects.

Elsewhere, the conversation turns to the continuing fallout from the Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein scandal, including scrutiny over royal housing arrangements for Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie and wider questions about transparency within the monarchy.

With criticism mounting and fresh revelations continuing to emerge, the episode asks whether the royal family faces a deeper reputational crisis — and whether Prince William could eventually lead a reset for the monarchy as the scandals surrounding Meghan Markle, Prince Andrew and the House of Windsor continue to dominate headlines.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Royal commentator Kinsey Schofield discusses reports that Meghan will headline a paid women’s retreat, with tickets costing thousands for an exclusive dinner and conversation event. The move comes amid renewed scrutiny over the Sussexes’ media deals and commercial ventures following setbacks with major platforms.

The episode also examines explosive new claims linked to the Epstein investigation and questions over Prince Andrew’s finances, royal privileges and taxpayer support. Author and royal expert Andrew Lownie argues the monarchy must become more transparent and restrict titles to the direct line of succession to protect the institution’s reputation.

With growing debate over how the royal family should handle scandals and commercialisation, the podcast asks whether Prince William and Catherine could represent a reset for the monarchy as public pressure for accountability increases.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Seward says Andrew is effectively living in limbo, describing him as being almost “under house arrest”, with the King trying to stop the bleeding while knowing the drip-drip of revelations is far from over. She also argues that Andrew may eventually have to speak, rather than stay silent as the Epstein fallout keeps circling the Royal Family.

The episode also tackles the BBC’s decision not to air the Commonwealth service, why that has sparked criticism, and what Meghan and Harry’s latest Australia trip really means. Seward’s verdict on the Sussexes is blunt too, suggesting “the King has probably slightly washed his hands of them” as they continue to pursue their own high-profile path outside royal life.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The discussion also turns to the continuing fallout from the Prince Andrew scandal. Hardman explains that while King Charles has taken severe action against his brother, removing titles, honours and royal privileges, many of the decisions people demand, such as removing Andrew from the line of succession, are ultimately matters for Parliament and the Commonwealth rather than the monarch.

There is also analysis of anti-monarchy protests outside Westminster Abbey and the wider question of public support for the Crown. Hardman argues that while groups like Republic are effective at making noise, they represent a relatively small minority, while the monarchy’s long-standing diplomatic role continues to play an important part in Britain’s global relationships. For listeners searching King Charles US visit, Prince Andrew scandal, Royal Family crisis, Donald Trump monarchy and Royal Tea podcast, this episode breaks down the latest royal drama and the politics surrounding it.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jeremy also examines the political pressure building around King Charles’ proposed state visit to the United States after tensions between Sir Keir Starmer and Donald Trump. With calls from some MPs to postpone the trip, the panel discusses whether the monarchy’s “soft power” could help steady the UK–US special relationship at a time of growing diplomatic friction.

Elsewhere, Meghan Markle’s reported split from Netflix and a controversial trip to Australia spark debate about the Sussexes’ future, while questions continue to hang over the York family as Princess Eugenie steps down from a charity role. For listeners searching Prince Andrew, Epstein files, King Charles US visit, Meghan Markle Netflix, and Royal Family scandal, this episode breaks down the latest twists shaking the monarchy.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Attention then turns to the reported decision to bar Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie from Royal Ascot. Lownie describes the move as a highly symbolic distancing by King Charles, suggesting it may indicate deeper concerns within the palace about what could still emerge. He reiterates that the York daughters were adults during key moments of the Epstein saga and claims their business links and travel history deserve scrutiny as part of a wider pattern of royal networking and influence.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Lownie also raises the stakes by suggesting the issue goes beyond personal misconduct, calling it a potential national security concern tied to Andrew’s international connections during his time as trade envoy. He questions whether key documents will ever be fully released and warns that kicking disclosures “into the long grass” will only fuel suspicion.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In a separate interview, Levin turns to the deepening Prince Andrew scandal and growing scrutiny of King Charles. She argues the King never wanted Andrew as trade envoy and was ultimately “very pleased” when the role ended, but admits public trust in the monarchy is being tested “like never before.” On the Sussexes’ timing, she is scathing, calling the Jordan visit “disgusting” and alleging it is designed to distract from royal turmoil at home. As questions mount over Andrew, transparency and the future of the monarchy, Levin insists the institution can survive, but only if it navigates the crisis carefully and restores confidence.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Davies goes further, alleging a long-running “conspiracy of silence” around Andrew’s conduct and calling for senior palace officials and potentially members of the Royal Family to be questioned if they were aware of relevant information. He argues that stripping Andrew of titles suggests those at the top were already convinced of serious wrongdoing, and insists the monarchy can only survive if it embraces full transparency and proves value for money. Without openness, he warns, public trust will continue to erode as the demand for accountability grows.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Later, author and historian Andrew Lownie tells Kyle the fallout could widen far beyond Andrew, arguing more palace staff, officials and former UK trade figures should be questioned about what they knew. Lownie says William and the King should be treated as potential “material witnesses” in terms of what the royal household knew and when, and claims the monarchy is at a crossroads where secrecy is no longer sustainable. He calls for a “reset” built on openness and proper scrutiny, warning the palace cannot rely on waiting for the problem to fade as anger grows and the questions keep coming.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The interview explores claims of a culture of “secrecy and deference” within the establishment, with Lownie suggesting senior figures, including the King, must have been aware of longstanding concerns about Andrew’s conduct. He calls for royal finances to face proper parliamentary scrutiny, unsealing of royal wills and removal of exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act. Questioning whether key documents will ever be released, Lownie predicts the issue could be delayed for years, warning that the establishment may seek to “kick this into the long grass” rather than allow full public accountability.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The interview also explores growing pressure from the public, comparisons with the backlash after Princess Diana’s death, and concerns about declining trust in the monarchy. Levin says the current anger will “calm down” but admits it will be “harder” for the Royal Family in the short term, while Jeremy Kyle highlights calls for greater accountability and openness. The conversation widens to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, with Levin claiming the Sussexes are focused on protecting their “brand” as the wider royal crisis continues to dominate global headlines.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The conversation explores mounting calls for accountability, transparency over royal finances, and whether Prince Andrew should be removed from the line of succession. Schofield explains that such a move would require new legislation and agreement across the Commonwealth, while Kyle argues public scrutiny of the monarchy is only intensifying. Despite the controversy, Schofield defends the constitutional monarchy as a vital source of political neutrality and soft power, warning that losing it could risk the kind of deep political polarisation seen in the United States.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ian Collins then interviews royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams on the latest in the Prince Andrew misconduct in public office probe and fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein files. Calling it “a very serious crisis” and highlighting the “drip, drip, drip of allegations,” Fitzwilliams examines what this means for Prince William and the future of the monarchy as scrutiny continues.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Later, Julia Hartley-Brewer is joined by commentator Benedict Spence to debate whether calls for a treason investigation go too far. Spence warns it is “very dangerous territory” and a “slippery slope,” while Julia insists “nobody in this country should be above the law.” As multiple police investigations continue and political tensions rise, the episode explores accountability, due process and whether Britain’s institutions are facing their biggest trust test in decades.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Rae argues that while Andrew must face full investigation, the inquiry should ultimately go wider to establish “who knew what and when.” He does not believe the King or Prince William were involved in any cover-up, suggesting they may have been reassured by Andrew at the time. However, he accepts that an independent or parliamentary-style probe may eventually be needed once criminal investigations conclude. Above all, he stresses the importance of not losing sight of the trafficking allegations, saying that the plight of alleged victims is “much, much more important” than disputes over leaked emails or royal embarrassment.

Later Julia speaks to royal commentator and historian Rafe Heydel-Mankoo about whether the Andrew scandal risks inflicting lasting damage on the monarchy. Heydel-Mankoo acknowledges a wider “disconnect between the British public and our institutions” and accepts that calls for transparency are justified. However, he argues that public anger is being aimed “squarely at Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor,” not at King Charles or Prince William, warning that some reactions – including talk of treason or removing Andrew from the line of succession – are “hysterical” and constitutionally unnecessary.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Then the conversation detonates into breaking news: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, with Kevin calling it “the biggest story I’ve ever covered” and Samara warning the stakes are huge: “The maximum sentence for that is a lifetime of imprisonment.” As police search property and questions swirl about who knew what, from royal protection officers to palace insiders, Samara says “this wasn’t a one man show… an entire apparatus”, while Ash fears the crisis could snowball upwards: “Did the King know anything about it?” The trio repeatedly stress it’s allegations and no charges, but the theme is unmistakable: a monarchy facing a trust test, and a royal soap opera getting darker by the day.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Davies questions why due diligence was not carried out on Andrew’s associates and travel, asking: “Where is the audit trail? Follow the money trail.” He says protection officers, diplomats and senior palace figures should all be examined, adding it “beggars belief” that nothing untoward was reported during overseas visits. He also raises concerns about potential national security implications, suggesting security services and ministers must answer what they knew and when.

Turning to the King, Davies says it is “uncharted waters” and admits he feels sympathy given the monarch’s health, but stresses that neither the palace nor government can “hide from telling the truth.” If wrongdoing or concealment were proven, he says, consequences would have to follow “like everyone else in this sorry saga.” Asked whether Andrew could ever face prison, Davies replies bluntly: “Call me cynical – I doubt it.”

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Levin is scathing about Andrew’s reported behaviour, saying she was “absolutely furious” to read he still expects to be called “sir”, branding him “a nasty piece” and warning the situation could worsen as more details emerge. She rejects claims that Prince William is manoeuvring for the throne, describing him instead as “very unhappy” and emotionally strained by his father’s and wife’s illnesses, but respectful of his father’s position.

Jeremy also speaks to former Security Minister Tom Tugendhat about whether alleged misconduct involving Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and others could amount to treason. Tugendhat stresses that nothing has been proven but says the real issue is “betrayal” and the damage it does to public trust. He notes Britain’s treason laws are centuries old and not fit for modern cases involving leaked secrets or insider dealing, but argues the broader question is what betrayal of the country means today. While careful not to prejudice any investigation, he says the allegations represent a “very serious loss of confidence” and warns that trust in institutions – from the Royal Family to government departments – must be rebuilt if faith in the system is to survive.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Lownie claims there were multiple moments over the past 15 years when decisive action could have been taken, but “too little too late” has left the institution in a dangerous position. He suggests King Charles is “compromised by his association with Andrew” and warns that if evidence shows the monarch knew more than he has admitted, “there may have to be some dramatic gesture” to preserve the Crown. In stark terms, Lownie says the King may ultimately need to “fall on his sword” to secure a reset under William and Catherine.

Meanwhile, Jeremy and US royal commentator Kinsey Schofield clash over whether King Charles should consider stepping aside as the Andrew crisis deepens. Kyle says he senses “a shift” in public mood and warns the monarch may need to “start again with a clean slate” under William and Catherine. Schofield pushes back, insisting the Crown is “divinely ordained” and not dependent on “the choices of your little brother that no one can stand.” She stresses the King is constrained during an active investigation and cannot risk jeopardising proceedings, but concedes Parliament could move to remove Andrew from the line of succession. Both agree the monarchy faces a defining moment that will test public trust.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

While stressing that the Rowlands were not accused of breaking laws, Oakeshott argues Andrew acted as a “door opener”, leveraging his role as UK trade envoy to grant access to global leaders and corporate chiefs. Crucially, she says the King’s office has not denied receiving the warning. “The buck ultimately stopping with the King,” she says, means the pressure now shifts to Charles to explain whether he took the concerns seriously or simply hoped the problem would “go away”.

Oakeshott likens the wider culture around royal perks to the MPs’ expenses scandal, describing a long-standing sense of “entitlement” and limited accountability. She believes the fallout could trigger deeper scrutiny of royal finances, foreign links and lifestyle privileges. Though she admits feeling some sympathy for a monarch facing personal and health challenges, she says this is an institutional reckoning. Whether the Palace moves to “spin it” or opts for transparency, she warns, this scoop puts the spotlight firmly on the King and raises profound questions about the future direction of the monarchy.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Griffiths reveals that Sarah Ferguson is “in a very bad way,” calling her a potential “safeguarding risk” and suggesting the Duchess is struggling mentally amid the crisis. She also warns that Royal Lodge could still hold damaging material, noting that the ongoing police search may run for days and that “among that clutter and rubbish, there could be something really damaging.” With mountains of evidence already emerging from the Epstein files, she says the Palace would be wise to brace for further revelations.

Turning to King Charles, Griffiths argues he should ultimately address the nation but only after police conclude key searches. She believes the monarch’s dominant emotion is likely “concern” rather than anger, describing him as “a real softy” who may feel sympathy for a brother she characterises as reckless and “not bright enough to make well-informed decisions.” As royal engagements are overshadowed and public trust wavers, this episode examines whether the monarchy can weather what Griffiths calls “the worst scandal to have ever happened to the monarchy” and how long this unprecedented royal crisis will dominate headlines.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jobson raises explosive questions about transparency at the top of the monarchy, arguing that “we have a right to know” where the money came from and why it was paid. He suggests that if investigators fail to put direct questions to the King, the public could see it as the same “antiquated deference” that has shielded the Royal Family in past crises. “Stop the whispering,” he insists, calling for facts to be put on the record rather than briefed anonymously.

The Talk interview also examines the wider legal and constitutional stakes. With multiple police forces investigating Andrew’s links to Jeffrey Epstein and alleged confidential disclosures during his time as UK trade envoy, Jobson says this is a defining moment. He urges the Palace to learn from past mistakes, warning that trust in the monarchy is “disintegrating right now” and calling for a more transparent, accountable institution to restore public confidence.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Collins asks what happens next, and Joseph suggests the royal has likely been released “under investigation” rather than on police bail. That means no bail conditions, but police can recall him for further interview at any time — a status introduced after public concern about suspects being left on bail for months or even years. They also touch on the idea that, aside from the reigning monarch’s legal immunity, there is no special treatment in procedure: everyone else goes through the same custody and interview process.

They then consider what the apparent speed and drama of an early-morning arrest might indicate. Joseph says police could have requested a voluntary interview instead, so choosing arrest implies they believed they had “reasonable grounds” to suspect an offence — still far short of charge, let alone trial, but more than gossip. On speculation around material emerging from the US “Epstein files”, she cautions she hasn’t seen the specifics, though credible, attributable communications could trigger enquiries. She adds that any investigation may move slowly due to the scale of examining electronic devices and the unpredictable drip-feed of further US disclosures, before Collins signs off with a light joke about Joseph’s calm, reassuring manner.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Former Palace insider Dickie Arbiter puts the Andrew affair “on a plane” with the abdication for sheer constitutional and reputational jeopardy, but argues Charles is doing what he can while a police investigation is live. Arbiter insists the King cannot go further than carefully worded statements without risking accusations of interference, and says the monarchy has survived by evolving for centuries though it must modernise further and become more transparent.

Historian and author Andrew Lownie brands the moment a “Me Too” reckoning for the Royal Family, warning that survival depends on full candour: what was known, when it was known, and who acted (or didn’t). Lownie frames the crisis as a potential turning point that could define Charles’s reign either as proof the monarchy is accountable under the law, or as evidence of an establishment that protected “bad apples” until forced to act.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Mark Dolan is joined by royal biographer Angela Levin to examine the shock arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and the personal and constitutional fallout. Levin describes the early-morning police visit as a “very, very bad shock” and argues the public humiliation marks a dramatic reversal for a figure she says carried a lifelong sense of superiority and entitlement.

The discussion focuses on Andrew’s character, with Levin linking his behaviour to the so-called “curse of the spare” and claiming he had long harboured ambitions for the throne. She argues his status as a favoured son fostered arrogance that shaped later decisions and poor judgment, now contributing to reputational damage for the wider royal family.

The conversation then turns to the implications for King Charles’ health, Prince William’s future role, and whether the scandal accelerates pressure for generational change. Levin suggests William has never been close to his uncle and may ultimately play a decisive role in distancing the monarchy, while the immediate priority remains managing the institutional impact of the crisis.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The discussion turns to Andrew’s long-standing issues of judgment, his associations with controversial figures, and whether the damage now extends beyond one individual to the institution itself. Oakeshott argues the scandal risks spreading to the wider royal brand, not because of direct wrongdoing by others, but because of questions over whether stronger intervention should have come earlier.

The episode also explores the political and constitutional stakes, including public perception of fairness, the challenge of empanelling an impartial jury in a high-profile case, and the possibility of further disclosures about Andrew’s business relationships. The conversation concludes with the implications for King Charles, with Oakeshott suggesting the monarch is unlikely to fall but acknowledging the crisis will define the early years of his reign.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In studio, former newspaper editor Neil Wallis describes the arrest as a rare, true “stop-the-presses” moment, while Talk’s royal correspondent Rupert Bell says the speed and intensity of the police action has shocked even those who felt it was “inevitable.” The discussion turns to the Palace response, King Charles’ message that “the law must take its course”, and whether the monarchy can contain the scandal to Andrew alone, or whether it risks contaminating the institution if the public senses anything less than full cooperation.

Joining from the US, royal commentator Kinsey Schofield argues investigators may have moved fast to secure evidence, particularly with Andrew “moving from one place to another,” and suggests the focus, at this stage, is the alleged sharing of confidential information in a government capacity rather than wider historic claims. The panel then debates whether Andrew should be removed from the line of succession to “tidy it up,” and what further steps, if any, Charles should take while an active investigation is ongoing.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Prince Andrew arrested, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, misconduct in public office, Epstein files, King Charles statement, “law must take its course”, royal family crisis, monarchy, line of succession, royal scandal, Sandringham arrest, released under investigation, police probe, public office offence, UK constitutional implications

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

He argues the arrest may “lance the boil” for the monarchy, restoring public faith that “the royals are not above the law,” but warns the implications could stretch far beyond one man. Lownie claims the King “knew far more than he’s saying” about past attempts to contain the scandal, and insists officials, aides and former trade envoys should now be questioned. “I approached 3,000 people,” he reveals, many of whom refused to speak, adding he is willing to hand material not yet in the public domain to investigators.

Calling this a potential “Me Too moment of the monarchy,” Lownie says the institution must embrace transparency on finances, archives and oversight if it is to retain public trust. As police examine allegations linked to Jeffrey Epstein, trade missions and confidential disclosures, he warns this could become “far more important than the abdication” in terms of modern royal crisis. Whether the arrest satisfies public anger or opens deeper questions about who knew what and when, Lownie says, will define the future of the Crown.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Neville calls the scale of the inquiry “enormous” and warns this is not a short-term operation. With multiple police forces examining evidence linked to Jeffrey Epstein, historic trade envoy trips and alleged confidential disclosures, he says coordination is critical. “Somebody’s got to take account for this,” Neville adds, raising questions about what protection officers, senior commanders and officials may have known at the time.

He also delivers a blunt assessment of the arrest itself, arguing that police are often criticised for targeting “the plebs and not the real villain”, but that this development shows investigators have now “got a grip of this”. As forensic teams sift through phones, emails and tablets, Neville predicts weeks, if not months, of digital analysis.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Breaking down the legal jeopardy, Gill outlines how misconduct in public office carries a maximum sentence of life in prison in the most serious cases. She explores the allegation that sensitive briefings linked to official trips to China, Vietnam and Afghanistan may have been shared with Jeffrey Epstein, raising profound questions about privilege, responsibility and whether royal status created a culture of impunity.

Andrew denies wrongdoing and has not been charged.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Low says the Jeffrey Epstein saga has been “dogging him for years and years and years” but that the latest allegations around the alleged disclosure of confidential government information take the case “to a different realm”. He also warns the offence is serious but “a notoriously difficult charge to make stick” with a “high bar” for prosecutors.

Discussing the dramatic fall from royal life to police custody, Low reflects that Andrew is someone who “always stood on his dignity” and that this represents “a long way to have fallen”. Ian and Valentine examine what happens next, from potential bail to the legal battle ahead, as the royal crisis deepens.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Drawing on decades covering the Royal Family, Rae gives a personal insight into Andrew’s character, describing him as “an arrogant man” who made it clear, “I am a Prince of the Realm.” The discussion revisits long-standing allegations connected to Jeffrey Epstein, Virginia Giuffre and claims of trafficking to the UK, asking why earlier complaints were not fully investigated and why misconduct in public office has become the first arrestable offence. Rae questions whether royal protection officers “must have seen something” during trips to Epstein’s New York residence, and whether more scrutiny is still to come.

As multiple police forces assess evidence and the monarchy faces intense global attention, Julia and Rae examine whether this moment ultimately shields King Charles by proving no one is above the law — or deepens the crisis engulfing the House of Windsor. With Andrew denying wrongdoing and the legal process now under way, this episode breaks down what happens next in the Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein and Royal Family investigation.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Davies tells Talk he has been calling for action “for nearly six years” and argues that the allegations around Andrew’s time as UK trade envoy are serious and potentially far reaching. He describes the case as a “Pandora’s box” with “enormous consequences” not only for Andrew but for the wider Royal Family. Questioning how senior palace officials handled early warnings, he says bluntly, “Stop taking us for fools, frankly,” and raises concerns about who knew what inside Buckingham Palace as the Epstein scandal unfolded.

In stark comments, Davies warns of a possible “conspiracy of silence” if evidence shows information was deliberately withheld, adding that as an investigator he would not stop at junior levels but would “go all the way up.” With Andrew now in custody and the monarchy facing intense scrutiny, this episode examines whether the arrest signals long awaited accountability or the beginning of a deeper reckoning for the institution itself.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Speaking in studio, Reform UK’s Shadow Chancellor Robert Jenrick said: “Nobody is above the law in this country.” He added that “the crimes that have been alleged are very serious and the police need to do whatever’s necessary to follow the evidence,” while acknowledging that many will ask why it has taken so long for this moment to arrive. “You’re right to raise questions about why it’s taken so long for this to come to a head,” he told Talk.

The arrest follows mounting scrutiny over the Epstein files, allegations relating to Andrew’s time as UK trade envoy, and claims that confidential information may have been shared with the convicted sex offender. While no charges have been brought and Andrew has consistently denied wrongdoing, today’s arrest represents a significant turning point in the Prince Andrew–Epstein scandal and raises fresh questions about accountability, transparency and whether the establishment has finally been forced to act.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Gill examines explosive allegations that coded phrases such as “Mrs Windsor will arrive shortly” were allegedly used to admit female visitors into Buckingham Palace without standard logging, alongside reports of up to 90 UK flights connected to Epstein’s private jet, including arrivals at Stansted after his 2008 conviction. With references in the Epstein files to women entering royal residences and growing scrutiny over record-keeping, background checks and security protocols, the focus shifts from salacious headlines to potential breaches of safeguarding and national security.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing and previously settled a civil claim without admission of liability, but Gill asks the unavoidable question: why has there been no visible escalation when others have faced swift action? As comparisons are drawn with investigations into other public figures, this episode explores whether the Andrew-Epstein scandal is evolving into a broader reckoning over royal protection, institutional cover-up claims, and who knew what inside the Palace as the Epstein files continue to reverberate across the UK.

Police arrive at Sandringham on Prince Andrew's 66th birthday as NINE forces investigate Epstein 'sex trafficking' claims

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Fitzwilliams warns that the Epstein files are “most unhelpful” to the sisters, noting that the controversy “gets bigger and more wriggling by the day.” He points to damaging revelations, including Sarah Ferguson taking “19 and 20-year-old” Beatrice and Eugenie to lunch with Epstein shortly after his release from prison, and questions about “where perhaps all the money came from” to fund earlier lifestyles. While “mentioning the files doesn’t denote wrongdoing,” he says, the reputational shadow is unavoidable.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor strenuously denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Bleksley tells Kevin O’Sullivan there “should not be this kind of delay” in launching a full criminal investigation, urging police to “get a grip” as pressure mounts over alleged failures of oversight and accountability. He questions whether deference toward royalty slowed action and suggests the Met must urgently establish what protection officers knew, what they reported, and whether any evidence was overlooked in relation to Epstein’s sex trafficking operation.

In a blistering exchange, Bleksley adds: “If you listen carefully, you can hear Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor bent over the shredder as we speak — possibly,” as the pair discuss fears that key documents, travel logs and communications linked to Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Little St James could disappear. With the Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor investigation widening, Talk examines whether Scotland Yard will now escalate the probe into alleged trafficking, misconduct in public office and potential obstruction — and whether this marks a turning point in the UK’s response to the Epstein scandal.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor strenuously denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Aston says the saga is “the story that keeps on giving”, warning that three million documents mean “there’s other stuff that will come up as time goes on”. She describes the files as a “can of worms” that is getting “bigger and more wriggling by the day”, adding that the forensic trawl through emails and records could have long-lasting consequences.

The interview also examines the position of the late Queen Elizabeth II, the £12 million settlement paid to Virginia Giuffre, and whether the Royal Family acted quickly enough. Aston says this “rotten apple is threatening to taint the whole picture” and argues the monarchy must embrace greater transparency as the Prince Andrew Epstein investigation continues to escalate.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor strenuously denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In a punchy monologue, Kevin claims the prospect of Meghan “dishing the dirt” is having a “catastrophic effect” on the Duke of Sussex, as reports suggest he is urging her to step back while she looks for new ways to boost income and fund their Montecito lifestyle.

Kevin links the alleged tensions to Harry’s emotional public appearance in Los Angeles, arguing the prince looked “shaking” and close to breaking point as he spoke at an event for bereaved parents. The show also revisits the Sussexes’ long-running feud with the Royal Family and the lingering fallout from past accusations aired in the Oprah Winfrey interview, with Kevin suggesting any fresh attacks would reignite the royal row at the worst possible moment.

The programme also turns to the deepening Prince Andrew crisis, as fresh scrutiny over the Epstein files continues. Kevin revisits the £12 million settlement paid to Virginia Giuffre, the role of Ghislaine Maxwell, and allegations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s links to the ex-Duke of York. With renewed calls for a criminal investigation and growing pressure on Buckingham Palace, he argues the Andrew scandal remains one of the most serious threats facing the monarchy.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor strenuously denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Julia Hartley-Brewer speaks to royal historian Andrew Lownie on Talk about the coordinated investigation and Surrey Police’s call for witnesses to come forward over allegations dating back to 1994.

Lownie says it is now “much harder to duck the bullet” with multiple forces involved, arguing the scale of alleged sex trafficking and potential misconduct in public office demands proper coordination, possibly by the National Crime Agency. He claims the issue is “getting bigger than Andrew” and warns the scandal risks reaching “a Watergate dimension” if questions about oversight and suppression are not addressed.

The interview also examines flight logs into Stansted and Luton, claims that victims were brought to the UK, and long-running FOI battles over Andrew’s time as trade envoy. Lownie says public anger reflects a belief that “there’s one rule for the royals and one rule for everyone else”, warning that without transparency the Prince Andrew Epstein scandal could pose a serious constitutional crisis for the monarchy.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor strenuously denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Mark Dolan speaks to royal commentator Kinsey Schofield about the growing legal and constitutional pressure on the monarchy.

Schofield warns that once “multiple police forces start reviewing evidence, the story stops being a past embarrassment and becomes a present constitutional threat”, adding that the case keeps the Royal Family tied to Jeffrey Epstein in the public mind and represents “a serious credibility crisis for the institution”. She says the King has tried to remove Andrew from public life but the latest disclosures risk turning a contained scandal into a defining issue of his reign.

The interview also examines the flight records, the coordinated police work across Essex, Thames Valley and the Met, and the wider political fallout, including Hillary Clinton’s calls for testimony and questions around Bill Clinton’s links in the files. Schofield concludes the affair is “a stain on the institution” and warns the future of the monarchy now depends on drawing a clear line under the Prince Andrew Epstein scandal.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor strenuously denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Kevin O’Sullivan speaks to royal biographer Angela Levin on Talk about claims the ex Duke of York could face prosecution for a “great many” offences and the mounting pressure on King Charles to respond.

Levin says the revelations are “too disgusting to imagine” and argues the crisis now requires a direct intervention from the monarch, warning that a simple pledge to assist police is “not enough”. She says the allegations are now “in writing” and that Andrew can no longer rely on saying he does not recall events, adding that public anger risks turning into a broader backlash against the Royal Family if the issue is not addressed.

The interview also examines emails referenced in the Epstein files, the legal hurdles around any US testimony, and the reputational fallout for Buckingham Palace. A hard hitting Talk discussion on Prince Andrew, the Epstein papers, King Charles, royal accountability and the growing calls for police action.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has strenuously denied any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Peter Cardwell speaks to royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams about the growing scrutiny on the ex-Duke of York and the implications for the Royal Family.

Fitzwilliams describes Clinton’s intervention as an “extraordinarily powerful claim” demanding transparency, noting that Andrew previously promised to cooperate but has resisted requests from US lawmakers. He says the former prince would fear travelling to the United States because of potential legal consequences, while lawyers could argue the scale of publicity would make a fair trial difficult.

The interview also examines allegations linked to Andrew’s time as UK trade envoy, possible misconduct in public office and his contacts with Jeffrey Epstein, alongside the coordinated work of UK police forces and the Palace’s pledge to assist if formally required. Fitzwilliams warns the situation “gets worse and worse”, highlighting the growing calls for testimony, disclosure and accountability on both sides of the Atlantic.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor strenuously denies any claim of wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Speaking to Mark Dolan on Talk, royal author Andrew Lownie said: "It's very difficult to remove it. He has to get permission from members of the Commonwealth. I think it's very unlikely that that case will happen. So it seems to be a slight distraction."

Lownie continued "I think the focus should be on the police now bringing charges against him for sex trafficking and for misconduct in public office. It's very clear that he has committed this crime, I think. They're investigating Mandelson, so why not Andrew?"

“This is a huge cover-up and it’s only going to get bigger.”

“Both the King and the late Queen have big questions to answer.”

Mountbatten-Windsor is currently eighth in line to the throne.

In October 2025 the government said there were no plans to formally remove Andrew from the line of succession, despite losing royal titles.

Andrew-Mountbatten Windsor has strongly denied any wrongdoing in his association with Jeffrey Epstein.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Lownie argues the scandal now threatens the wider Royal Family, warning it has been “handled very badly” and suggesting senior figures may have helped protect the ex Duke of York. He says Parliament, the CPS and police must examine not only the Epstein links but Andrew’s financial dealings, overseas trade trips and the role of officials who enabled them.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any claim of wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Stephen Parkinson, the Director of Public Prosecutions, said “nobody is above the law” and said he had confidence police would act independently. Thames Valley Police said it is assessing allegations, including claims Andrew shared confidential trade envoy documents with Epstein and that an Epstein associate joined an official overseas trip. Buckingham Palace has said the King is ready to support police if asked.

Kevin O'Sullivan speaks with royal author Andrew Lownie.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Peter Cardwell speaks to royal author Norman Baker who tells Talk the latest Epstein revelations amount to “treason” in his view, while the handling of the Prince Andrew Epstein scandal raises fundamental questions and asks “who in the Royal Family knew what and when” after the £12 million settlement reportedly funded by senior royals -- including the late Queen Elizabeth II. 

Andrew-Mountbatten Windsor has strongly denied any wrongdoing in his association with Jeffrey Epstein.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Julia Hartley-Brewer speaks to former Head of Royal Protection Dai Davies on Talk about why the former prince has never been interviewed by police and whether that position is still tenable.

Davies says Prince Andrew “needs investigating by a police service with the courage to go where the evidence takes them”, adding “if you and I had done a fraction of this, we would have had a knock on the door”. He repeats that he has been raising the issue for years and that, where credible evidence exists, the ex-Duke of York should be “questioned under caution like anyone else”.

He argues “people have known about these allegations for a decade and nothing was done”, calling for scrutiny across government, the Foreign Office and security bodies. In a stark verdict on the Andrew-Epstein scandal, Davies says “something rotten is in our establishment”, describes the former duke as “a serially bad man, in my humble opinion”, and calls it “the biggest scandal I can remember in my lifetime”.

Andrew-Mountbatten Windsor has strongly denied any wrongdoing in his association with Jeffrey Epstein.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

They examine the latest claims that the ex-Duke of York abused his position, the reports that references to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor were redacted from newly released Epstein documents, and what that means for transparency and accountability in both the UK and the US. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein

The conversation also turns to Pam Bondi’s Epstein letter naming hundreds of high-profile figures, and the realistic legal and political consequences that could follow on both sides of the Atlantic.

Keywords: Prince Andrew, Epstein files, Royal Family, Dickie Arbiter, Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, royal scandal, UK monarchy.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this interview, Mark Dolan is joined by royal commentator Kinsey Schofield and journalist Linda Duberley to break down the latest developments, including claims newly surfaced documents show the Duke of York may have abused his position, and reports that key references to him were quietly redacted weeks after the files were released.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein

The panel also examines the full list of high-profile names mentioned in Pam Bondi’s Epstein correspondence, what it means legally and politically, and whether pressure is mounting for further disclosures on both sides of the Atlantic.

Plus, a look at the contrasting royal narrative as Meghan Markle and Prince Harry make a very public Valentine’s weekend appearance courtside at the NBA All-Star Game, and what it signals about their ongoing media strategy.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Meghan Markle’s latest all-out war of toxicity continues, with critics suggesting Prince William and Princess Catherine want nothing to do with her.

The BBC has reportedly had to apologise to Catherine, Princess of Wales for continually referring to her as ‘Kate Middleton’ throughout their Armistice Day memorial service broadcasts.

Allegations are still swirling regarding Andrew Mountbatten Windsor's relationship with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, with the controversy showing no signs of going away anytime soon.

Prince William has been praised for not ‘leveraging’ his Mother, Diana, Princess of Wales’ name for publicity purposes, unlike Prince Harry…

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Meghan Markle has been blasted for the timing of her announcement about her return to acting, with critics claiming she orchestrated the timing to coincide with Prince William being in Brazil working on his Earthshot Prize project.

Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and Sarah “Fergie” Ferguson are reportedly going to live separately once they move out of The Royal Lodge after 30 years living together.

Prince Harry meets Canada’s oldest veterans while King Charles leads Remembrance Day commemorations.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

King Charles was heckled whilst on a walkabout, being asked, ‘Did you know about Andrew and asked the Government to cover it up?

Andrew, formerly known as Prince, stripped of titles and honours, and now styled as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

Reports suggest Andrew has been offered residence in Abu Dhabi by the Crown Prince.

And there's suggestions that Sarah Ferguson knew Jeffrey Epstein before Andrew did, and got him involved with the disgraced sex offender.

Meanwhile Meghan Markle has been blasted for sharing a social media clip of her and Harry picking pumpkins with their “faceless children”.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Joining Afua Hagan today to discuss all that and more are Royally Us podcast host Christine Ross, The Sun’s Royal Photographer Arthur Edwards and royal author and Editor in Chief of Majesty Magazine Ingrid Seward. The couple's decision to use their titles on their website has raised questions about their intentions. Some believe that they are trying to reclaim their connection to the royal family, while others see it as a strategic move to boost their image and monetise their brand. The controversy surrounding their use of titles highlights the ongoing tension between the couple and the royal family.

In addition to their website rebranding, Prince Harry and Meghan have also signed a new podcast deal with Lemonada, a production company known for its celebrity viral podcasts. The couple's podcast, Archewell Audio, is set to make a comeback with new episodes, and Meghan has hinted at other shows in the future. This new venture is seen as a way for the couple to make money and further establish their brand. While the couple's rebranding efforts may have received praise for their attention to detail and creativity, there are skeptics who question the frequent changes in their image. Some argue that the constant rebranding suggests a lack of direction and stability. Others believe that the couple's actions are driven by financial motives rather than a genuine desire to make a positive impact. Click here for more from TalkTV https://talk.tv If you need any help visit: https://talk.tv/helplines #royals #princeharry #meghanmarkle

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Specifically, they address the unsealing of court documents revealing allegations against Andrew and the implications for the Royal Family. Jobson says that the case is highly damaging to Andrew and the Royals, particularly with the emergence of new documents. He suggests that Andrew's decision not to fight the case was a mistake, and this choice continues to harm his public image.

Afua discusses the legal aspect, noting that Andrew's settlement with Virginia Giuffre, Epstein's accuser, does not imply guilt but admits the situation looks bad. They agree that while the evidence may be flimsy, Andrew's judgement, especially his connection with Epstein, is questionable. Jobson mentions the potential consequences, such as losing his royal lodge, but notes the complexities due to his lease.

The conversation shifts to Queen Camilla's new podcast, "The Queen's Reading Room," focusing on its format and content. Both commentators express disappointment that it doesn't feature Camilla interviewing authors, despite the podcast's name suggesting otherwise.

The discussion then moves to the Princess of Wales, Kate Middleton, celebrating her 42nd birthday. They note the low-key nature of the celebrations compared to previous years, reflecting on her evolving role within the Royal Family and her future responsibilities.

Finally, they touch on Prince Harry's induction as a "living legend of aviation," comparing his military service to other inductees like Buzz Aldrin. They find the award somewhat overstretched but acknowledge Harry's service.

Throughout, the speakers engage in a detailed analysis of the Royal Family's current challenges and the public perceptions shaped by recent events and media portrayals.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The photograph released after the reception showcased the King, Queen Camilla, the Prince and Princess of Wales in all their finery. This image of the four senior royals together was seen as a deliberate display of unity and determination to move on from the controversy. The reception itself was a grand affair, with over 500 members of the diplomatic corps hosted in the palace's state rooms. It was a reminder of the monarchy's role in diplomacy and their commitment to their duties.

Joining Sarah Hewson to discuss all that and more are The Sun’s Royal Editor Matt Wilkinson and The Evening Standard’s Royal Editor Robert Jobson.

This is the Royal Tea.

Click here for more from TalkTV https://talk.tv

If you need any help visit: https://talk.tv/helplines

#endgame #meghanmarkle #royalfamily #princeharry #omidscobie

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Joining Sarah Hewson to discuss all that and more are royal commentator and Talk TV regular Afua Hagan and The Sun’s former Royal Editor Emily Andrews.

Click here for more from TalkTV https://talk.tv

If you need any help visit: https://talk.tv/helplines

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On the rest of this week's Royal Tea the panel discuss the King’s lavish state banquet for the President of South Korea, PLUS how Harry and William could be sticking to one Christmas tradition this year and find out which royal has claimed they are brought up to not overshare.

Joining Sarah Hewson to discuss all that and more are royal commentator and TalkTV host Daisy McAndrew and royal correspondent Rupert Bell.

Click here for more from TalkTV https://talk.tv

If you need any help visit: https://talk.tv/helplines

#royalfamily #harryandmeghan #princeharry #kingcharles

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week's Royal Tea Afua Hagan presents and is joined by The Evening Standard Royal Editor Robert Jobson and Newsweek's Chief Royal Correspondent Jack Royston.

Click here for more from TalkTV https://talk.tv

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.