nuts, and I just had to remind myself that the audience is going nuts for Frank N Furter

they’re not going nuts for Craig McLachlan.” — C2

In this episode, Michael Cain and Craig McLachlan examine the allegations and charges

brought against him in relation to his castmate, known as C2. After this cast member was

passed over for a principal role in 2015 and was again unsuccessful in 2017 auditions, should

her fury over not being cast have been directed at Craig McLachlan, and should that have

been a major consideration for the press, the police, and the Magistrate?

We explore the legal and procedural questions: How and why can the police add multiple

charges after the initial ones? Why is the credibility of the complainant not weighed,

especially after three drafts of a statement become increasingly detailed and inflammatory?

Why wasn’t archival footage of the show considered or subpoenaed, and how is it that, even

years later, not even the complainant’s husband could corroborate her story?

Join us for this deeply perplexing episode and consider the “brave and honest” label the

Magistrate publicly attached to the case.

You can watch the original video version of this episode here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLH12d7p8gE

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

of the criminal case — including the charge that became almost too absurd to believe: the so-

called "ankle tickle"

But it's Vanessa who brings the questions that cut to the heart of it all. How can anyone be

expected to modify or reflect on their behaviour if no one ever raises a concern with them

directly? When friendly interactions and communications continue freely — in the workplace

and beyond it — is it just to have complaints aired so publicly, and so devastatingly, in the

press?

This is the unfiltered, human side of a case that ultimately ended in full acquittal. No spin. No

filter. Just the truth.

You can watch the original video version of this episode here: https://youtu.be/GHjLmXbrNlY?si=j2Tvzf6pcTGIt5HE

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Craig speaks candidly about what it's like performing in a stage show like Rocky Horror — and whether it rivals the intensity of a grand final football match. He also weighs in on the significant outcome of Victorian police paying half a million dollars in costs related to the case.

With insights shared for the very first time, this is a must-listen episode straight from the man at the centre of it all.  Not to be missed.

You can watch the original video version of this episode here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtRd5c_7Ero

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

After the detailed examination of timelines, evidence and legal rulings presented in Part 1, this second chapter features UNFILTERED interviews between Michael Cain and Craig McLachlan.

The questions are not shared with Craig beforehand and his responses are entirely spontaneous — unscripted and unrehearsed. With no director or producer guiding the conversation, these interviews provide a candid and unfiltered insight into the experiences of the man at the centre of one of Australia’s most widely reported legal cases.

You can watch the original video version of this episode here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ap-wyeksXJo&t=9s

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

turns her focus to the Magistrate’s rulings — and in particular, two aspects that continue to

generate debate.

First, the reference to the “old” versus “new” laws. What do these legislative changes actually

mean in practical terms? How do they alter the way a court assesses conduct, intention, and

consent? And could there possibly have been a different outcome had the newer provisions

applied?

Second, the Magistrate’s description of Craig’s accusers as “brave and honest.” What is the

role of judicial commentary following an acquittal? Where is the line between explaining a

decision and making observations that may have lasting reputational consequences?

In this episode, Vanessa explores not only the legal mechanics, but the broader question of

accountability. What responsibility rests with judicial officers when their remarks carry

significant public impact? And what recourse exists when commentary is perceived as

thoroughly damaging?

Stay tuned for a compelling and thought-provoking discussion.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

conflict: what happens when someone believes their reputation has been tarnished?

Vanessa continues the examination of the final charge laid against Craig McLachlan, focusing

on his former friend and colleague known as C1. The episode asks a difficult question —

what does it mean when a friendship continues for years after events are later described as

misconduct? And what, ultimately, prompted allegations that carried such serious and lasting

consequences?

This episode explores previously unseen context, including text messages sent to close

friends that raise questions about C1's timing and intention. Were these messages related to

motive?

Attention also turns again to the police investigation itself. Why were certain claims not more

deeply tested? What happens when supposed eyewitness accounts shift, evolve, or fail to

align with other evidence before the court?

Episode 8 confronts one of the most contentious issues in the case: the difference between

mistake, exaggeration, and deliberate falsehood. When inconsistencies arise under oath, how

are they characterised — and who decides whether a moment becomes a credibility issue, an

error, or something more serious?

More broadly, the episode reflects on the power of narrative. How do public frameworks and

cultural slogans influence the way allegations are received, reported, and remembered? And

what happens when a legal outcome does not fully displace a narrative that has already taken

hold?

This is an episode about friendship, credibility, investigation, and the lasting impact of

reputational harm — asking whether the full story is ever heard once a public narrative is

established.

Watch the accompanying Unfiltered episode in which Craig McLachlan is interviewed by Michael Cain: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFpXYmtGiSM

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this instalment, Vanessa examines the final complainant in the matter, known as C1, and brings a central allegation and its surrounding story to a decisive end.

Through a forensic and uncompromising analysis, the events surrounding the Rocky Horror bed scene are laid out in full. Evidence, timelines and testimony are examined piece by piece, revealing a version of events that is confronting, unexpected, and at times deeply shocking.

But the episode goes further, asking questions that are rarely voiced aloud.

When a complainant is not a stranger but a friend — when contact, messages and communication continued right up until the moment allegations were made — does that carry evidentiary weight? If no indication was ever given that anything was wrong, what does continued friendship mean, and how should a court interpret it?

Vanessa also revisits commentary from the presiding Magistrate, questioning whether public remarks truly reflected what unfolded inside the courtroom, and whether the tone of those remarks shaped how the case was ultimately understood.

Episode 7 is confronting listening. It challenges assumptions, revisits evidence, and asks whether the story told to the public was the same story tested under oath.

Watch the accompanying Unfiltered episode in which Craig McLachlan is interviewed by Michael Cain: https://youtu.be/_Na2HPg9dHU?si=mvjKSG5qe62bPRMG

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Vanessa also explores a difficult question: why did the judgment appear reluctant to portray the complainants in an unflattering light, even where evidence suggested that elements of the backstage culture of the 2014 production were actively embraced by those involved? If certain behaviour was criticised in one direction, why did similar conduct seem to be viewed differently in another?

Another central question raised in this episode concerns the nature of truth itself. Is leaving out relevant evidence or context simply an oversight, or can omission be as misleading as an outright falsehood? In examining early interviews and reporting surrounding C3, Vanessa considers material she believes was not fully disclosed at the time, including accounts of persistent backstage bullying, and asks how the public narrative may have been shaped when some aspects were emphasised while others were left unexplored.

Watch the accompanying Unfiltered episode in which Craig McLachlan is interviewed by Micheal Cain: https://youtu.be/-kRunHGz_Lg?si=ARttRZ2sIxG0REbT

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In Episode 5, Vanessa examines the final charge laid against Craig McLachlan, relating to hisRocky Horror Showcolleague known as C2. This episode considers how questions ofreliability and credibility can arise in relation to a key witness, and how such issues areaddressed within the legal process. It explores whether inconsistencies or disputed accountscarry consequences, and reflects on the manner in which evidence was assessed in this case.The episode also examines why certain aspects of the complainant’s evidence receivedlimited scrutiny in public reporting, despite their relevance to the Magistrate’s ultimatefinding. Episode 5 offers a careful and detailed examination of allegations and charges that,upon closer inspection, may not be as straightforward as they first appeared.

Watch the accompanying Unfiltered episode in which Craig McLachlan is interviewed by Michael Cain: https://youtu.be/J5_6X-dLDH4?si=ukeIfIviMSVa9sNA

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

acquittal — being found not guilty — be affected by the pressures and trends of social and

cultural movements in our society? How far have these movements, and the trending hashtags

associated with them, infiltrated the bastions of the law?

This episode focuses on the complainant known as C2 and the charges laid against Craig McLachlan in relation to her evidence. Vanessa takes listeners through allegations involving a

“hug” and an “onstage kiss,” and examines courtroom commentary from the Magistrate that

raises serious and troubling questions about how such matters are assessed.

Watch the accompanying Unfiltered interview with Craig McLachlan and Michael Cain: https://youtu.be/kLH12d7p8gE?si=D2EIic7wEP5UVmW8

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Watch the accompanying Unfiltered episode in which Craig McLachlan is interviewed by Michael Cain: https://youtu.be/GHjLmXbrNlY?si=_TuzrSN6RjM-UtFW

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Watch the Unfiltered companion interview in which Craig McLachlan sits down with journalist Michael Cain to go beyond the headlines and unpack the story behind Not Guilty: The Craig McLachlan Case Podcast.

https://youtu.be/jtRd5c_7Ero?si=NGrTNywyFT8PpJ0V

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

https://youtu.be/Ap-wyeksXJo?si=pqPYByBJb7ZN91VX

NOT GUILTY – The Craig McLachlan Case is a factual true-crime podcast hosted by Vanessa Scammell, examining the criminal case heard in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court and the events that unfolded around it. Through interviews, a detailed discussion of public court records, and a close examination of evidence, the series explores aspects of the story that were obscured, neglected or misunderstood in much of the original press coverage. With a calm and considered approach, the podcast invites listeners to engage openly with the full complexity of the case, and to reflect on the consequences of “page one guilt” — when public judgement is formed before a matter is tested in court, and when allegations reach the media before the police. Eight years on, the case continues to exact a heavy personal cost, raising difficult questions about justice, truth, rehabilitation and the enduring impact of accusation beyond a verdict of Not Guilty.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.