<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/global/feed/rss.xslt" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podaccess="https://access.acast.com/schema/1.0/" xmlns:acast="https://schema.acast.com/1.0/">
    <channel>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<generator>acast.com</generator>
		<title>Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates</title>
		<link>http://intelligencesquaredus.org/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://feeds.acast.com/public/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		<language>en</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2019 - For Personal Use Only 633344</copyright>
		<itunes:keywords/>
		<itunes:author>IQ2US Debates / Panoply</itunes:author>
		<itunes:subtitle>Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates bring Oxford-style debate to America – one motion, one moderator, two panelists for the motion and two against.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary><![CDATA[America feels divided. From the most salient questions about our national identity and place in the world, to fundamental concerns about technology, religion, the economy, and public policy, Intelligence Squared U.S. is here to help. A respite from polarized discussions, we bring together the smartest minds to debate and dissect issues in depth, restoring civility and bringing intelligence to the public square in the process.<hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		<description><![CDATA[America feels divided. From the most salient questions about our national identity and place in the world, to fundamental concerns about technology, religion, the economy, and public policy, Intelligence Squared U.S. is here to help. A respite from polarized discussions, we bring together the smartest minds to debate and dissect issues in depth, restoring civility and bringing intelligence to the public square in the process.<hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
		<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name>IQ2US Debates </itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>info+5de64768a636582b5a75625f@mg-eu.acast.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
		<acast:showUrl>intelligence-squared-us-debates</acast:showUrl>
		<acast:signature key="EXAMPLE" algorithm="aes-256-cbc"><![CDATA[wbG1Z7+6h9QOi+CR1Dv0uQ==]]></acast:signature>
		<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmTHg2/BXqPr07kkpFZ5JfhvEZqggcpunI6E1w81XpUaBscFc3skEQ0jWG4GCmQYJ66w6pH6P/aGd3DnpJN6h/CD4icd8kZVl4HZn12KicA2k]]></acast:settings>
        <acast:network id="60075dc2795a1c638da1520c" slug="diana-heuvel"><![CDATA[Diana Heuvel]]></acast:network>
		<acast:importedFeed>https://feeds.megaphone.fm/PNP1207584390</acast:importedFeed>
		<itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			
			<itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.acast.com/public/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f</itunes:new-feed-url>
		<item>
			<title>#174 - Is Capitalism a Blessing?</title>
			<itunes:title>#174 - Is Capitalism a Blessing?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>54:24</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e59c2716-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-0b4063c3a37a/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e59c2716-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-0b4063c3a37a</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52928</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52928</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zZUBXbtyielq7F2oyjr9BmI7eg3gCW5jQ+9N4rRKBYRXS3Ibbl1TKmH8iSxbbDIOIZvLO2esn99ZLRsupmLtTiQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>with John Mackey, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Bhaskar Sunkara, and Richard D. Wolff</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>174</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/eb4c54ea737d49f1c01e27dede2b412a.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Capitalism has always had its critics. But now, a new generation of political leaders, scholars, and activists are calling the free-market system into question. Has capitalism been a force for good? And should it be the economic model of the future?</p><br><p><strong>FOR THE MOTION:</strong></p><p>John Mackey - Co-Founder &amp; CEO, Whole Foods Market</p><p>Katherine Mangu-Ward - Editor-in-Chief, Reason</p><br><p><strong>AGAINST THE MOTION:</strong></p><p>Bhaskar Sunkara - Founding Editor, Jacobin</p><p>Richard D. Wolff - Professor Emeritus of Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst</p><br><p><a href="GETQUIP.COM/debate">GETQUIP.COM/debate</a> for your first refill free!</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Capitalism has always had its critics. But now, a new generation of political leaders, scholars, and activists are calling the free-market system into question. Has capitalism been a force for good? And should it be the economic model of the future?</p><br><p><strong>FOR THE MOTION:</strong></p><p>John Mackey - Co-Founder &amp; CEO, Whole Foods Market</p><p>Katherine Mangu-Ward - Editor-in-Chief, Reason</p><br><p><strong>AGAINST THE MOTION:</strong></p><p>Bhaskar Sunkara - Founding Editor, Jacobin</p><p>Richard D. Wolff - Professor Emeritus of Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst</p><br><p><a href="GETQUIP.COM/debate">GETQUIP.COM/debate</a> for your first refill free!</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#173 - Is Parenting Overrated?</title>
			<itunes:title>#173 - Is Parenting Overrated?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:46</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e5964684-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-27f4fb179570/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e5964684-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-27f4fb179570</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52929</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52929</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zTiWUvjj3C1IYsUn5ezFYlRQhuXThfiOFnrIMaxVP9OYhW0GVnOT+Y8n/FHQAIwmo9oXiUpHDp+5MP263bryZBw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Robert Plomin, Nancy Segal, Paige Harden, and Ann Pleshette Murphy</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/235fb47b709b3c7970ca811fd6893774.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>How much does our DNA shape who we become? Four experts in science and psychology debate the classic "nature versus nurture" question with a eye toward recent breakthroughs in genetic science and DNA testing.</p><p><strong>FOR THE MOTION:</strong></p><p>Robert Plomin - Professor of Behavioral Genetics, King’s College London</p><p>Nancy Segal - Professor of Psychology, California State University, Fullerton &amp; Director, Twin Studies Center</p><br><p><strong>AGAINST THE MOTION:</strong></p><p>Paige Harden - Psychology Professor, University of Texas</p><p>Ann Pleshette Murphy - Author &amp; Parenting Expert</p><br><p>Cast your vote at <a href="https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/europe-has-declared-war-american-tech-companies">www.iq2us.org</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>How much does our DNA shape who we become? Four experts in science and psychology debate the classic "nature versus nurture" question with a eye toward recent breakthroughs in genetic science and DNA testing.</p><p><strong>FOR THE MOTION:</strong></p><p>Robert Plomin - Professor of Behavioral Genetics, King’s College London</p><p>Nancy Segal - Professor of Psychology, California State University, Fullerton &amp; Director, Twin Studies Center</p><br><p><strong>AGAINST THE MOTION:</strong></p><p>Paige Harden - Psychology Professor, University of Texas</p><p>Ann Pleshette Murphy - Author &amp; Parenting Expert</p><br><p>Cast your vote at <a href="https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/europe-has-declared-war-american-tech-companies">www.iq2us.org</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#172 - Has Europe Declared War on American Tech Companies?</title>
			<itunes:title>#172 - Has Europe Declared War on American Tech Companies?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2019 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:45</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e590e4a0-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-7f74903f7734/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e590e4a0-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-7f74903f7734</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5292a</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5292a</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zHdcZp4x3oOxR+BYgwgV94DyFumjIuHPQJwNzgMPzeCZoB/r66/4tw0bpCApi2yQk1TrcEqWZDz6cDE7BhGWheA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Roslyn Layton, Berin Szóka, Marietje Schaake, Ramesh Srinivisan</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>172</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/97335b2f87b0d3a076e9ccfe86b727a2.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Should we look to Europe for the future of big tech regulations? Four leading thinkers in tech, governance, and law debate the state and future of big tech, and whether it's time to impose greater regulations on companies like Amazon, Facebook, Google, and Twitter.</p><p><strong>FOR THE MOTION:</strong></p><p>Roslyn Layton - Visiting Scholar, American Enterprise Institute</p><p>Berin Szóka - Founder and President, TechFreedom</p><br><p><strong>AGAINST THE MOTION:</strong></p><p>Marietje Schaake - International Policy Director, Stanford's Cyber Policy Center &amp; Fmr. Member, European Parliament</p><p>Ramesh Srinivasan - Director, UC Digital Cultures Lab &amp; Professor, UCLA</p><br><p>Cast your vote at <a href="https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/europe-has-declared-war-american-tech-companies">www.iq2us.org</a></p><p>Get 20% off your first order at <strong>nativedeodorant.com </strong>and entering promo code<strong> DEBATE </strong>during checkout.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Should we look to Europe for the future of big tech regulations? Four leading thinkers in tech, governance, and law debate the state and future of big tech, and whether it's time to impose greater regulations on companies like Amazon, Facebook, Google, and Twitter.</p><p><strong>FOR THE MOTION:</strong></p><p>Roslyn Layton - Visiting Scholar, American Enterprise Institute</p><p>Berin Szóka - Founder and President, TechFreedom</p><br><p><strong>AGAINST THE MOTION:</strong></p><p>Marietje Schaake - International Policy Director, Stanford's Cyber Policy Center &amp; Fmr. Member, European Parliament</p><p>Ramesh Srinivasan - Director, UC Digital Cultures Lab &amp; Professor, UCLA</p><br><p>Cast your vote at <a href="https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/europe-has-declared-war-american-tech-companies">www.iq2us.org</a></p><p>Get 20% off your first order at <strong>nativedeodorant.com </strong>and entering promo code<strong> DEBATE </strong>during checkout.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#115 - Is Affirmative Action in College Admissions Constitutional?</title>
			<itunes:title>#115 - Is Affirmative Action in College Admissions Constitutional?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>56:06</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e58b9fae-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-f76d695d2f56/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e58b9fae-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-f76d695d2f56</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5292b</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5292b</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zW7dZYm9+SeWAZUOYXdWIxEEDDoicLp3g1cPns+KJbgmxfVa4SiF8prvqT1QQ3DfJ2W+RF5NS3OztIAj6caGlCA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Roger Clegg, Deborah Archer, Erwin Chemerinsky, and Stuart Taylor, Jr.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>115</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/1c365f1b58e6ed6f8cb74ed62fc0864a.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Students for Fair Admissions just challenged Harvard's affirmative action guidelines in federal court, and lost. But the advocacy group is gearing up to make their case again – this time, in the Supreme Court. In this episode, we revisit this timely and contentious debate: Does the Constitution allow racial preferences in university admissions?</p><p>Use code <strong>Friends30 </strong>for 30% off tickets to upcoming live debates: <a href="https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/buy-tickets">https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/buy-tickets</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Students for Fair Admissions just challenged Harvard's affirmative action guidelines in federal court, and lost. But the advocacy group is gearing up to make their case again – this time, in the Supreme Court. In this episode, we revisit this timely and contentious debate: Does the Constitution allow racial preferences in university admissions?</p><p>Use code <strong>Friends30 </strong>for 30% off tickets to upcoming live debates: <a href="https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/buy-tickets">https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/buy-tickets</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#171 - Should We Replace Private Insurance With Medicare For All?</title>
			<itunes:title>#171 - Should We Replace Private Insurance With Medicare For All?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:53</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e5870f48-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-07f3f950005a/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e5870f48-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-07f3f950005a</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5292c</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5292c</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zCVXoZpPm0CLYQ/oPz4Jl9BOgo9SRl6yzfC9X3UvMSIU5g0RRBcM4s3eghMzaG4WKsFUof1kMmNA5MWRAt9akPA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Dr. Adam Gaffney, Joseph Sanberg, Nick Gillespie, and Sally Pipes</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/6c3ca7b285a226d487904021e7c80007.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As the nation gears up for the 2020 election, Democrats are promising bold new changes to the American health care system, including scrapping private health insurance and adopting “Medicare for All.” Is this a bold and effective way to repair health care in America? Or will it inflate the already swelled federal deficit?</p><p>Learn more about upcoming debates at www.iq2us.org/buy-tickets </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>As the nation gears up for the 2020 election, Democrats are promising bold new changes to the American health care system, including scrapping private health insurance and adopting “Medicare for All.” Is this a bold and effective way to repair health care in America? Or will it inflate the already swelled federal deficit?</p><p>Learn more about upcoming debates at www.iq2us.org/buy-tickets </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#170 - Unresolved: Shifting Power in the Middle East</title>
			<itunes:title>#170 - Unresolved: Shifting Power in the Middle East</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:50</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e5827514-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-e7d04e3f9e45/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e5827514-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-e7d04e3f9e45</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5292d</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5292d</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zVw+7qYqw9YXyqOHjtXFdrf5xEMkfrtZN0bPv01a6SzLxMa5lHyf6BWFMo3JHJ3bYLkEqF8iHCm04lm5mVM0aaQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Michael Doran, Marc Reuel Gerecht, Bernard Haykel, Brett McGurk, and Barbara Slavin</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>170</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/341c98844e4924f4ea4b09d4460a0f7f.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Saudi Arabia and Iran are vying for regional dominance. Turkey is cozying up to Russia and China. And instability, conflict, and proxy wars have engulfed Syria, Yemen, and beyond. How should the United States respond to shifting power in the Middle East? Five leading national security experts debate.</p><p>Learn more about the upcoming season and buy tickets to a live debate at www.iq2us.org/buy-tickets</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Saudi Arabia and Iran are vying for regional dominance. Turkey is cozying up to Russia and China. And instability, conflict, and proxy wars have engulfed Syria, Yemen, and beyond. How should the United States respond to shifting power in the Middle East? Five leading national security experts debate.</p><p>Learn more about the upcoming season and buy tickets to a live debate at www.iq2us.org/buy-tickets</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bonus Episode: Are We In a New Authoritarian Era?</title>
			<itunes:title>Bonus Episode: Are We In a New Authoritarian Era?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>48:38</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e57d50f2-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-cb9aa4780147/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e57d50f2-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-cb9aa4780147</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5292e</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5292e</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zMoz2ZFbo3Ci1O/Ae59kxRnIH+zjf5zwIAXyhF+3B38hS9d4AvAX3j17RNVoLA4Roo+dnmjry/An3Z7ql1UKP8w==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[With Susan Glasser & Yascha Mounk]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/68374c352cc67c8490bd63c197b1b9e8.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In this special episode, host John Donvan sits down with two of America's leading thinkers on politics and foreign policy: Susan Glasser and Yascha Mounk. They discuss the rise of authoritarian leaders around the world and their featured articles in the September/October issue of <em>Foreign Affairs</em> magazine. </p><p>Go to <a href="http://www.foreignaffairs.com/faiq2">www.ForeignAffairs.com/faiq2</a> and enter the promo code faiq2 for a discounted issue.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>In this special episode, host John Donvan sits down with two of America's leading thinkers on politics and foreign policy: Susan Glasser and Yascha Mounk. They discuss the rise of authoritarian leaders around the world and their featured articles in the September/October issue of <em>Foreign Affairs</em> magazine. </p><p>Go to <a href="http://www.foreignaffairs.com/faiq2">www.ForeignAffairs.com/faiq2</a> and enter the promo code faiq2 for a discounted issue.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Chris Anderson on Ideas & Inspiration]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Chris Anderson on Ideas & Inspiration]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/10abfd2e-ca94-11e9-a0ec-4bfb21431930/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">10abfd2e-ca94-11e9-a0ec-4bfb21431930</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5292f</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5292f</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zK7znNh54BThV81fArW4InOuqpQFbCow8GT62Q0MB8fyDqensq664d/uGzB3CxeFSh7yopy8ETHfzhhJ1RdDtFg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/fa36e12ab44e15b6e2f5e355073fa0b5.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>How do good ideas and persuasive arguments change the world? In this episode, host John Donvan speaks with TED curator Chris Anderson about how bringing people together to share new and innovative ideas will shape our collective future.  </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>How do good ideas and persuasive arguments change the world? In this episode, host John Donvan speaks with TED curator Chris Anderson about how bringing people together to share new and innovative ideas will shape our collective future.  </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#169 - Is U.S. Policy Toward China Productive?</title>
			<itunes:title>#169 - Is U.S. Policy Toward China Productive?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:38</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e577bdd6-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-5f0e0b9b4720/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e577bdd6-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-5f0e0b9b4720</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52930</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52930</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z7TnxOlO0FDoD8DrUnaIaohXDls9oQSYiRXkdniEaypv4zuZNtwhh+ZJbVQEjsK5LlGB2Ok6xnYVSxDWEa4F4HA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Michael Pillsbury, Kori Schake, Graham Allison, and Jake Sullivan</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/d290345a70b6c279de05befea7d9958b.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Are recent U.S. policies toward China tough and focused enough to achieve key economic and strategic objectives? Or will U.S. policy escalate tensions too much, ultimately reducing thechances that the world’s two major powers can achieve a sensible accommodation? Join four leading experts for a debate on the motion, “The Recent U.S. Policy Toward China Is Productive.” Learn more about Intelligence Squared U.S. and cast your vote to decide the winner at <a href="https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/recent-us-policy-towards-china-productive">IQ2US.org</a>.   <a href="http://slate.com/podcasts/how-to">Charles Duhigg's "How To" podcast</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Are recent U.S. policies toward China tough and focused enough to achieve key economic and strategic objectives? Or will U.S. policy escalate tensions too much, ultimately reducing thechances that the world’s two major powers can achieve a sensible accommodation? Join four leading experts for a debate on the motion, “The Recent U.S. Policy Toward China Is Productive.” Learn more about Intelligence Squared U.S. and cast your vote to decide the winner at <a href="https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/recent-us-policy-towards-china-productive">IQ2US.org</a>.   <a href="http://slate.com/podcasts/how-to">Charles Duhigg's "How To" podcast</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Simon Johnson on Science & the Economy]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Simon Johnson on Science & the Economy]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>56:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/9f9fb2e6-bfe0-11e9-ad97-3ba22cd7d29c/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">9f9fb2e6-bfe0-11e9-ad97-3ba22cd7d29c</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52931</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52931</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zDgffw481xr+3BZpeEPUE2YyvnyobrP6+mLRbqqAiaotE4zhysoLc27xK1HTY/6LA/dpV+xMfcGe0pT1dufkpBQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/5f0f26f52a4ca2a249bbd5843588fd16.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Can focusing on science and technology transform how Americans think about the economy and the future of the nation's working class? In this episode of Discourse Disrupters, former IMF chief economist Simon Johnson joins host John Donvan for a conversation about his new book, "Jump-Starting America: How Breakthrough Science Can Revive Economic Growth and the American Dream."</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Can focusing on science and technology transform how Americans think about the economy and the future of the nation's working class? In this episode of Discourse Disrupters, former IMF chief economist Simon Johnson joins host John Donvan for a conversation about his new book, "Jump-Starting America: How Breakthrough Science Can Revive Economic Growth and the American Dream."</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Allison Schrager on Risk and Reason In Everyday Life</title>
			<itunes:title>Allison Schrager on Risk and Reason In Everyday Life</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>46:58</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e57333ce-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-f3983bb5a0fb/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e57333ce-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-f3983bb5a0fb</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52932</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52932</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zGTRwfXMbsmjJ9oohvpsAN2c+7eQVDn3h3ylpfLJG+9JNvzJskqoGJO8a1FDpBejbPRlI3MYtg/qFCt51mwBmZQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/4abdbc73c4d29a0cd452443309ac38ff.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>What happens when an economist walks into a brothel? In this episode, economist and author Allison Schrager talks with host John Donvan about her new book, “An Economist Walks Into a Brothel,” and how you can use reason to assess risk in your everyday life.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>What happens when an economist walks into a brothel? In this episode, economist and author Allison Schrager talks with host John Donvan about her new book, “An Economist Walks Into a Brothel,” and how you can use reason to assess risk in your everyday life.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nadine Strossen & Thane Rosenbaum on Hate Speech in America]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Nadine Strossen & Thane Rosenbaum on Hate Speech in America]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>57:48</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e56e6678-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-e34355883505/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e56e6678-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-e34355883505</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52933</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52933</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zpuMUoYnrlJmkzvPqps4f4PXdlwOuyW3Lg/q1l9GMrJyhphxQeEvAb1aiBqlbRsqLoBT2vk2giAlwd8bmxGGAeA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Nadine Strossen and Thane Rosenbaum</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/042026a2255727dabd919c992c9145f8.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Discourse Disrupters, two of America’s top legal minds tackles one of the most pressing questions of the day: what should we do about "hate speech."</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Discourse Disrupters, two of America’s top legal minds tackles one of the most pressing questions of the day: what should we do about "hate speech."</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#168 - Has the Transatlantic Relationship Been Irreparably Damaged?</title>
			<itunes:title>#168 - Has the Transatlantic Relationship Been Irreparably Damaged?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e569e6fc-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-937f6fd91396/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e569e6fc-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-937f6fd91396</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52934</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52934</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zvsJ1uZSkb6NrO5btXVnjlWtmPkcjcK7Lnb1xVbErYjjleuemvVmKovrbqpgxftbcOAkm5sZcE3a5P+9C7Vv6Cg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Federiga Bindi, Constanze Stelzenmüller, John Mearsheimer, and Carla Norrlof</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>168</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/c1fb5dbe163da6eec80ef5fc6668be14.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Populism is on the rise. Relations between American and European leaders are often tense. Is the transatlantic relationship beyond repair? Four of the brightest foreign policy minds gather in Brussels for this timely and thoughtful debate. This debate is presented in partnership with the German Marshall Fund of the United States.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Populism is on the rise. Relations between American and European leaders are often tense. Is the transatlantic relationship beyond repair? Four of the brightest foreign policy minds gather in Brussels for this timely and thoughtful debate. This debate is presented in partnership with the German Marshall Fund of the United States.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bonus Episode: How Europe Is Answering to "America First"]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Bonus Episode: How Europe Is Answering to "America First"]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>32:50</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e56534cc-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-539dd1d25895/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e56534cc-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-539dd1d25895</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52935</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52935</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zC8QwSg3ydCcgm0cv7166E342BAHV6qndZNvHzsP9mfTQ+sFovuFlk/8Tfdx/Ozx2DdxDm9gEK5Vbz19rkQWGZw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Team IQ2US is busy in Brussels, getting ready to bring you our next debate, “The Transatlantic Relationship Has Been Irreparably Damaged.” This one will be presented in partnership with the German Marshall Fund. In this episode, get ready for the debate with a special episode of “Out of Order,” created by our partners. In this podcast, the German Marshall Fund's president Karen Donfried sits down with senior fellow Peter Sparding to discuss the future of the transatlantic relationship. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Team IQ2US is busy in Brussels, getting ready to bring you our next debate, “The Transatlantic Relationship Has Been Irreparably Damaged.” This one will be presented in partnership with the German Marshall Fund. In this episode, get ready for the debate with a special episode of “Out of Order,” created by our partners. In this podcast, the German Marshall Fund's president Karen Donfried sits down with senior fellow Peter Sparding to discuss the future of the transatlantic relationship. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#153 - Is Social Media Good for Democracy?</title>
			<itunes:title>#153 - Is Social Media Good for Democracy?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>51:55</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e55f61d2-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-67f5c2a24d20/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e55f61d2-9ff2-11e8-9e8a-67f5c2a24d20</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52936</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52936</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zGZc6jCkbL1S4BYDcJLxNJU717IEs3j0uVPCWO37KT5t8056vyuT1gK4BCmm0nDta+C7+xrJyP+3wSbc/kLY5MQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Jeff Jarvis, Emily Parker, Franklin Foer, and Roger McNamee</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/10831c082313a1d6af7079765a3e2527.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A decade ago, Facebook and Twitter promised a digital revolution that would bolster democratic values and empower users around the world. Did that work out? In this episode, we take a look back at one of our most important debates to date. Join four leading thinkers in tech, policy, and media for spirited and timely debate on the motion, "Social Media Is Good For Democracy."</p><p>Cast your vote on the motion at iq2us.org</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>A decade ago, Facebook and Twitter promised a digital revolution that would bolster democratic values and empower users around the world. Did that work out? In this episode, we take a look back at one of our most important debates to date. Join four leading thinkers in tech, policy, and media for spirited and timely debate on the motion, "Social Media Is Good For Democracy."</p><p>Cast your vote on the motion at iq2us.org</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#126 - Should the U.S. Give Undocumented Immigrants a Path to Citizenship?</title>
			<itunes:title>#126 - Should the U.S. Give Undocumented Immigrants a Path to Citizenship?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:01</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8b256526-1d99-11e8-b5cf-0f37de091d89/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8b256526-1d99-11e8-b5cf-0f37de091d89</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52937</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52937</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z68XekzMVCw3LTohnx176AbzQ+Zb0e/VxDqYPqSziAXv4Tab69ryUr9UilEMcqk588f0PGbEMf1Wl1iQKSz0xig==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Angela Kelley, Steven Camarota, Marielena Hincapié, and Rich Lowry</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>126</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/b925d23b740c5cb5d03c1853cc73100c.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There are an estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States today. In a divided and contentious political climate where immigration is a key issue for voters across the ideological spectrum, what should happen to these individuals? This episode, we take a look back at our debate on the motion, "Give Undocumented Immigrants a Path to Citizenship." </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>There are an estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States today. In a divided and contentious political climate where immigration is a key issue for voters across the ideological spectrum, what should happen to these individuals? This episode, we take a look back at our debate on the motion, "Give Undocumented Immigrants a Path to Citizenship." </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#134 - Is Universal Basic Income the Safety Net of the Future?</title>
			<itunes:title>#134 - Is Universal Basic Income the Safety Net of the Future?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8b212d1c-1d99-11e8-b5cf-63080c39269d/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8b212d1c-1d99-11e8-b5cf-63080c39269d</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52938</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52938</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zghBeLNynZoREfpOyLPG6guPU2CH0odBhKK5ynU+odWNmoC+FHCFrYy3ZEjWFBqfNcbZRwyKwglUH1rqqQocUAg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Charles Murray, Andrew Stern, Jared Bernstein, and Jason Furman</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>134</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/f30b000990dafce44a3933cfeb461e0e.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Presidential contender Andrew Yang wants to give every American a monthly check from the government, just to cover the basics. And he's not alone. Business leaders, particularly those in Silicon Valley, and some Democratic politicians are warming up to the idea of a universal basic income as a means to offset the impacts of automation in the workforce. In this episode, we take a look back at our debate on the motion, "The Universal Basic Income Is the Safety Net of the Future."</p><p>Receive your free 7-day trial at <a href="https://www.blinkist.com/nc/partners/intelligence-squared-us-debates"><strong>blinkist.com/debate</strong></a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Presidential contender Andrew Yang wants to give every American a monthly check from the government, just to cover the basics. And he's not alone. Business leaders, particularly those in Silicon Valley, and some Democratic politicians are warming up to the idea of a universal basic income as a means to offset the impacts of automation in the workforce. In this episode, we take a look back at our debate on the motion, "The Universal Basic Income Is the Safety Net of the Future."</p><p>Receive your free 7-day trial at <a href="https://www.blinkist.com/nc/partners/intelligence-squared-us-debates"><strong>blinkist.com/debate</strong></a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#167 - Should Scientists Dim the Sun?</title>
			<itunes:title>#167 - Should Scientists Dim the Sun?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8b1d40e4-1d99-11e8-b5cf-5360c9bf0e06/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8b1d40e4-1d99-11e8-b5cf-5360c9bf0e06</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52939</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52939</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zQT3MTCLTx5ggBG7r+rHM1BNlf4gAfl1jJy6I5i+VBdbGuP1ZVeP5HNN7ry6SL9kapTeobH63n9AZeAhYT71cAg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Clive Hamilton, Anjali Viswamohanan, David Keith, and Ted Parson</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>167</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/b1c2b9af2b4f74a2f1118d388222307d.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Right now, climate engineers are working on new technologies that would reflect the sun’s rays away from earth. For some, it’s a bold new plan to combat climate change. For others, it's a dangerous attempt to meddle with Mother Nature. Join four leading climate scientists for a debate on the motion, “Engineering Solar Radiation Is a Crazy Idea.” </p><p>Learn more about Intelligence Squared U.S. and cast your vote to decide the winner at IQ2US.org. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Right now, climate engineers are working on new technologies that would reflect the sun’s rays away from earth. For some, it’s a bold new plan to combat climate change. For others, it's a dangerous attempt to meddle with Mother Nature. Join four leading climate scientists for a debate on the motion, “Engineering Solar Radiation Is a Crazy Idea.” </p><p>Learn more about Intelligence Squared U.S. and cast your vote to decide the winner at IQ2US.org. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#166 - All Hail the Driverless Car?</title>
			<itunes:title>#166 - All Hail the Driverless Car?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8b190010-1d99-11e8-b5cf-2b6319f56357/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8b190010-1d99-11e8-b5cf-2b6319f56357</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5293a</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5293a</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zgzeTNcZpzd6mcTQYYENjsm3Mz0ykUbyMmDpakeVblcVsZlVnm89FbCyAm64U4lYdjMTY5ZLbKDkWNg9xVWw6Og==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Amitai Bin-Nun, Chris Urmson, Meredith Broussard, and Ashley Nunes</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>166</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e0b6466dd3c89c8cc109334de7755a38.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>What if the next car you buy or taxi you hail drives itself? Join four leaders in autonomous vehicles for a timely debate on whether society should embrace driverless cars or approach these new, controversial vehicles with caution. </p><p>Learn more about Intelligence Squared U.S. and cast your vote to decide the winner at IQ2US.org. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>What if the next car you buy or taxi you hail drives itself? Join four leaders in autonomous vehicles for a timely debate on whether society should embrace driverless cars or approach these new, controversial vehicles with caution. </p><p>Learn more about Intelligence Squared U.S. and cast your vote to decide the winner at IQ2US.org. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#165 - Should the Republican Party Re-Nominate Trump?</title>
			<itunes:title>#165 - Should the Republican Party Re-Nominate Trump?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>54:35</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8b14fd3a-1d99-11e8-b5cf-1b7ceb56e2ea/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8b14fd3a-1d99-11e8-b5cf-1b7ceb56e2ea</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5293b</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5293b</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zOOJvSqygB4aOCMrkpOrtZHqnl10bjYGARWEeMr+EIwixheyrZbwNfpMVD9xe4U2KocAtz1cAloK/ZxCM0Tns/w==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Jeff Flake, Bret Stephens, Kris Kobach, and Liz Peek</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>165</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/761c2853c8a323b6a69700b88605c0d4.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Former Senator Jeff Flake and the New York Times’ Bret Stephens team up to argue the motion, “The Republican Party Should Not Re-Nominate Trump.” They face Kris Kobach, a former Trump advisor and former Kansas Secretary of State, and Fox New’s Liz Peek, who are rooting for Trump 2020. </p><p>Learn more about Intelligence Squared U.S. and cast your vote to decide the winner at <a href="https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/">IQ2US.org. </a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Former Senator Jeff Flake and the New York Times’ Bret Stephens team up to argue the motion, “The Republican Party Should Not Re-Nominate Trump.” They face Kris Kobach, a former Trump advisor and former Kansas Secretary of State, and Fox New’s Liz Peek, who are rooting for Trump 2020. </p><p>Learn more about Intelligence Squared U.S. and cast your vote to decide the winner at <a href="https://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/">IQ2US.org. </a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>IQ2 Interview: Should You Love Your Enemies?</title>
			<itunes:title>IQ2 Interview: Should You Love Your Enemies?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:47</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/861cc68e-51a3-11e9-96c6-93a716951bf9/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">861cc68e-51a3-11e9-96c6-93a716951bf9</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5293c</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5293c</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zYOokDQ/VVZUoAokK7s7aCZNRaa7BstLmAYWiKhwyuEkRPyGz9Ug4CZ+PbC7yX92I5BQ9SbY9OtdLZvg3jmlE/A==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Arthur Brooks</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e97531a5bfaf488511afff2106dd0868.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In this special episode of Intelligence Squared U.S., John Donvan sits down with one of America's leading political thinkers to discuss a bold premise: loving your enemies. Arthur Brooks is a best-selling author and the outgoing president of the American Enterprise Institute. His new book, "Love Your Enemies: How Decent People Can Save America from the Culture of Contempt", builds on his decades in politics and challenges Americans to love each other despite partisan differences.  Learn more about membership and our upcoming debates at iq2us.org.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>In this special episode of Intelligence Squared U.S., John Donvan sits down with one of America's leading political thinkers to discuss a bold premise: loving your enemies. Arthur Brooks is a best-selling author and the outgoing president of the American Enterprise Institute. His new book, "Love Your Enemies: How Decent People Can Save America from the Culture of Contempt", builds on his decades in politics and challenges Americans to love each other despite partisan differences.  Learn more about membership and our upcoming debates at iq2us.org.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#164 - Can Constitutional Free Speech Principles Save Social Media Companies From Themselves?</title>
			<itunes:title>#164 - Can Constitutional Free Speech Principles Save Social Media Companies From Themselves?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:56</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8b10e024-1d99-11e8-b5cf-97321b0bec50/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8b10e024-1d99-11e8-b5cf-97321b0bec50</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5293d</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5293d</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zg+S5t7VexvmS/Ltl2g/v6lA+K5WCpTxp07Mjf2lK19UD/EdaswKxuY6HTUXZ46edJcqnH4FReZCzp5atzh+D+w==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With David French, Corynne McSherry, Nathaniel Persily, and Marietje Schaake</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>164</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/f99571cf654f4d91be409f7b9d3188ad.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>With David French, Corynne McSherry, Nathaniel Persily, and Marietje Schaake</strong></p><p>How should the world's largest social media companies respond to a pernicious online climate, including hate speech and false content posted by users? For some, the answer is clear: Take the fake and offensive content down. But for others, censorship - even by a private company - is dangerous in a time when digital platforms have become the new public square and many Americans cite Facebook and Twitter as their primary news sources. Rather than embracing European hate speech laws or developing platform-specific community standards that are sometimes seen as partisan, they argue, social media companies should voluntarily adopt the First Amendment and block content only if it violates American law. Should First Amendment doctrine govern free speech online? Or are new, more internationally focused speech policies better equipped to handle the modern challenges of regulating content and speech in the digital era? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>With David French, Corynne McSherry, Nathaniel Persily, and Marietje Schaake</strong></p><p>How should the world's largest social media companies respond to a pernicious online climate, including hate speech and false content posted by users? For some, the answer is clear: Take the fake and offensive content down. But for others, censorship - even by a private company - is dangerous in a time when digital platforms have become the new public square and many Americans cite Facebook and Twitter as their primary news sources. Rather than embracing European hate speech laws or developing platform-specific community standards that are sometimes seen as partisan, they argue, social media companies should voluntarily adopt the First Amendment and block content only if it violates American law. Should First Amendment doctrine govern free speech online? Or are new, more internationally focused speech policies better equipped to handle the modern challenges of regulating content and speech in the digital era? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#163 - Unresolved: The Techonomic Cold War With China</title>
			<itunes:title>#163 - Unresolved: The Techonomic Cold War With China</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8b0c6170-1d99-11e8-b5cf-138c6ce0c3e4/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8b0c6170-1d99-11e8-b5cf-138c6ce0c3e4</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5293e</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5293e</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z4P0R+sp1dakFswuxdBv/sytxCbEqwcnqmOmbo4T/xIHRvRNJ9niqb4Dv7DfKMmZ6S6peCvus8qXV5RtYAIqUGw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Ian Bremmer, Michèle Flournoy, Yasheng Huang, Parag Khanna, and Susan Thornton</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>163</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/035f6460b2c724e11277433d71fb7592.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>With Ian Bremmer, Michèle Flournoy, Yasheng Huang, Parag Khanna, and Susan Thornton</strong></p><p>President Xi Jinping has made it clear: When it comes to big data, advanced weaponry, and other innovations in tech and AI, China has plans to surpass the United States as the world’s next techonomic superpower. But between the trade war with the U.S., the ambitious Belt and Road Initiative, and an array of domestic challenges, are China’s goals outpacing its capacity? Or is China building and investing in strategic partnerships that will push the country toward global dominance?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>With Ian Bremmer, Michèle Flournoy, Yasheng Huang, Parag Khanna, and Susan Thornton</strong></p><p>President Xi Jinping has made it clear: When it comes to big data, advanced weaponry, and other innovations in tech and AI, China has plans to surpass the United States as the world’s next techonomic superpower. But between the trade war with the U.S., the ambitious Belt and Road Initiative, and an array of domestic challenges, are China’s goals outpacing its capacity? Or is China building and investing in strategic partnerships that will push the country toward global dominance?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Special Release: Can AI Change Your Mind?</title>
			<itunes:title>Special Release: Can AI Change Your Mind?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>54:09</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8b07e370-1d99-11e8-b5cf-3b616fbee8bb/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8b07e370-1d99-11e8-b5cf-3b616fbee8bb</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5293f</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5293f</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zyqDhO5Gl/hQZysZ4lH2a6FzGhIpW3Riogsa4hbf25HSMSGstuDw3v9jcAx0+N3JER+ok9GOqrm2zIXMXisD72A==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>162</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/97668c4c9bb5378df55adfff728fda80.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In this special episode of Intelligence Squared U.S., we partner with IBM for a historic debate that brings AI to the stage. IBM Project Debater is the first AI system designed to debate humans on complex topics using a combination of pioneering research developed by IBM researchers. In this debate, Project Debater faces world-class debater Harish Natarajan on the motion, "We Should Subsidize Preschool". </p><p>Still curious about AI? Dive into more debates: </p><p>Past Debate - Don’t Trust the Promise of AI: <a href="http://smarturl.it/ArtificialIntellMain">http://smarturl.it/ArtificialIntellMain</a></p><p>Upcoming Debate - All Hail Driverless Cars: <a href="http://smarturl.it/DriverlessCar">http://smarturl.it/DriverlessCar</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>In this special episode of Intelligence Squared U.S., we partner with IBM for a historic debate that brings AI to the stage. IBM Project Debater is the first AI system designed to debate humans on complex topics using a combination of pioneering research developed by IBM researchers. In this debate, Project Debater faces world-class debater Harish Natarajan on the motion, "We Should Subsidize Preschool". </p><p>Still curious about AI? Dive into more debates: </p><p>Past Debate - Don’t Trust the Promise of AI: <a href="http://smarturl.it/ArtificialIntellMain">http://smarturl.it/ArtificialIntellMain</a></p><p>Upcoming Debate - All Hail Driverless Cars: <a href="http://smarturl.it/DriverlessCar">http://smarturl.it/DriverlessCar</a></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#161 - Should We Bring Extinct Creatures Back To Life?</title>
			<itunes:title>#161 - Should We Bring Extinct Creatures Back To Life?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>54:35</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8b033f14-1d99-11e8-b5cf-9783ceccb9ce/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8b033f14-1d99-11e8-b5cf-9783ceccb9ce</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52940</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52940</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z1anuQAPYrbfCJcyjV9ykUZH84BNzQfqlmIWa2/o2H1s9xuBuA5ZjIEYvpOJz2oDPpuZW4EB7ReQnLkTNF/bWsw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Dr. Ross MacPhee, Stewart Brand, Dr. Lynn J. Rothschild, and Dr. George Church</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>161</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/c378e707b1704536f85f3037db5a0991.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Don't Bring Extinct Creatures back to Life</p><p></strong>Once a sci-fi fantasy explored in films like “Jurassic Park,” recent biological and technological breakthroughs indicate that reviving extinct creatures could become a reality. Proponents argue that the benefits include correcting mistakes of the past by bringing back extinct ecosystems and organisms. Others argue it's not ethical, or even feasible. Should humans bring extinct creatures back to life? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Don't Bring Extinct Creatures back to Life</p><p></strong>Once a sci-fi fantasy explored in films like “Jurassic Park,” recent biological and technological breakthroughs indicate that reviving extinct creatures could become a reality. Proponents argue that the benefits include correcting mistakes of the past by bringing back extinct ecosystems and organisms. Others argue it's not ethical, or even feasible. Should humans bring extinct creatures back to life? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#160 - Ten Years After the Global Financial Crisis, Is the System Safer?</title>
			<itunes:title>#160 - Ten Years After the Global Financial Crisis, Is the System Safer?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>54:49</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8afbee1c-1d99-11e8-b5cf-770126fcb9ce/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8afbee1c-1d99-11e8-b5cf-770126fcb9ce</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52941</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52941</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z9DFnpa7O7ML6rxmrvwLs9Xmbx4vuiQUY5GgmdjOU8CJYCemgmZDTzXO0AIN172knhfiGArBGwP5FiFfem8Y42g==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>160</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/0ed86f5031fbac691fc0b07580f5fb86.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Ten Years After the Global Financial Crisis, the System Is Safer More than 10 years ago, </strong></p><p>Lehman Brothers collapsed, and the world witnessed one of the worst financial crises in global history. Has the world learned its lesson and created a more resilient global financial system? Or are we ill-prepared for next time?  </p><p>Join Us Live In New York on January 31st for "Don't Bring Extinct Creatures Back to Life" - http://smarturl.it/De-ExtinctionTix</p><p>Foreign Affairs Exclusive Discount - www.ForeignAffairs.com/faiq2 </p><p>Enter the promo code faiq2 at checkout</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Ten Years After the Global Financial Crisis, the System Is Safer More than 10 years ago, </strong></p><p>Lehman Brothers collapsed, and the world witnessed one of the worst financial crises in global history. Has the world learned its lesson and created a more resilient global financial system? Or are we ill-prepared for next time?  </p><p>Join Us Live In New York on January 31st for "Don't Bring Extinct Creatures Back to Life" - http://smarturl.it/De-ExtinctionTix</p><p>Foreign Affairs Exclusive Discount - www.ForeignAffairs.com/faiq2 </p><p>Enter the promo code faiq2 at checkout</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Season Preview: New Year, New Debates</title>
			<itunes:title>Season Preview: New Year, New Debates</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>4:24</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/5d1e6eec-1385-11e9-880e-932d8a8c6f86/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5d1e6eec-1385-11e9-880e-932d8a8c6f86</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52942</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52942</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zDStcy3/eW1h+7mppALSWDmQn+KqUKx14wsiYVeZ7QFE7or4pMk9ag4ndcV5DOhEWuVdhS3rUHYT0XdDdULl8kA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:episodeType>trailer</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Announcing our new season! This winter, we’re taking on new issues, including the state of the global financial system, whether we should try to bring extinct creatures back to life, and whether we’re in a techonomic cold war with China. Our debates will feature leading thinkers like Michele Flournoy, Neel Kashkari, Parag Khanna, Stewart Brand, George Church, Jason Furman, Gillian Tett, Ian Bremmer, and more. </p><p>To get your tickets, visit IQ2US.org/buy-tickets or text “IQ2” to 79-79-79. </p><p>To join our Friends Program, visit IQ2US.org/support-us. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Announcing our new season! This winter, we’re taking on new issues, including the state of the global financial system, whether we should try to bring extinct creatures back to life, and whether we’re in a techonomic cold war with China. Our debates will feature leading thinkers like Michele Flournoy, Neel Kashkari, Parag Khanna, Stewart Brand, George Church, Jason Furman, Gillian Tett, Ian Bremmer, and more. </p><p>To get your tickets, visit IQ2US.org/buy-tickets or text “IQ2” to 79-79-79. </p><p>To join our Friends Program, visit IQ2US.org/support-us. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#83 - Should We Avoid Eating Anything With A Face?</title>
			<itunes:title>#83 - Should We Avoid Eating Anything With A Face?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>54:05</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8af3147c-1d99-11e8-b5cf-97e7982e8104/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8af3147c-1d99-11e8-b5cf-97e7982e8104</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52943</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52943</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zahXfXq8A+Q8/LgQPK/KLmsf6nNn/uqd38n7HjxXt1pPZzSLXTZKCWEt9blWi8UtowFDy5nH+VnxOUKo2zABeZw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>83</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/958dbaff1b1f971078e285e3d7fc8ce1.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Don't Eat Anything with a Face</strong></p><p>From the Archive: Are humans meant to be carnivores? Revisit our debate featuring “21-Day Weight Loss Kickstart” author Neal Barnard, Farm Sanctuary co-founder Gene Baur, nutritional scientist Chris Masterjohn, and farmer and author Joel Salatin. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Don't Eat Anything with a Face</strong></p><p>From the Archive: Are humans meant to be carnivores? Revisit our debate featuring “21-Day Weight Loss Kickstart” author Neal Barnard, Farm Sanctuary co-founder Gene Baur, nutritional scientist Chris Masterjohn, and farmer and author Joel Salatin. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#105 - Is Smart Technology Making Us Dumb?</title>
			<itunes:title>#105 - Is Smart Technology Making Us Dumb?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>54:07</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8aeedf56-1d99-11e8-b5cf-5797cc0cfcdf/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8aeedf56-1d99-11e8-b5cf-5797cc0cfcdf</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52944</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52944</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z+0/ohCQUXqVh1ws/isu0cEvs5Br6L5izPwNNQ8QpzXNwFympnvkw3ji8QQh/r7T5a7RLG3yivwqoMdJPVl8rwA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Nicholas Carr, Genevieve Bell, Andrew Keen, and David Weinberger</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>105</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/ca4ef4fd15be902609df56be59c3c364.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Smart Technology is Making us Dumb.</strong></p><p>Smart technology grants us unprecedented, immediate access to knowledge and to each other -- a ubiquitous and seamless presence in everyday life. But is there a downside to all of this connectivity? It’s been said that smart technology creates dependency on devices, narrows our world to echo chambers, and impairs cognitive skills through shortcuts and distraction. Are these concerns an overstatement of the negative effects of high-tech consumption?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Smart Technology is Making us Dumb.</strong></p><p>Smart technology grants us unprecedented, immediate access to knowledge and to each other -- a ubiquitous and seamless presence in everyday life. But is there a downside to all of this connectivity? It’s been said that smart technology creates dependency on devices, narrows our world to echo chambers, and impairs cognitive skills through shortcuts and distraction. Are these concerns an overstatement of the negative effects of high-tech consumption?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#159 - Has Silicon Valley Lost Its Soul?</title>
			<itunes:title>#159 - Has Silicon Valley Lost Its Soul?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:28</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8ae9bd46-1d99-11e8-b5cf-1fc9981b7e97/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8ae9bd46-1d99-11e8-b5cf-1fc9981b7e97</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52945</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52945</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zIW255ncP/IJUGx+eYAF7HK7R/Kn21EmyMvlI0q5AMYUxAIsIwzn9fqAXCCq9g+Mth9ZuHC3JvGfyCW1RRkThzw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Noam Cohen, Leslie Berlin, Dipayan Ghosh, and Joshua McKenty</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>159</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/da8f3823c5d3152e8b7995ee31bad0ad.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Silicon Valley Has Lost Its Soul.</p><p></strong>Silicon Valley once promised to solve many of the world's problems with a technological revolution. But now, the tech hub is the center of much scrutiny, and for many, that scrutiny is warranted. From privacy violations to flawed business models to a lack of diversity and representation, Silicon Valley has seemingly betrayed its idealism. And though technological progress has notably enriched a few, Silicon Valley has failed to deliver its promise to all. Has the prioritization of profits and conformity of thought corrupted its original "do good" agenda? Proponents argue no: Silicon Valley's critics are simply overreacting. After all, it is still the center of innovation, and the tech giants have revolutionized the way we think, shop, communicate, and experience our lives for the better. Do big tech's detractors simply expect too much from lucrative corporations? Or has Silicon Valley lost its soul?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Silicon Valley Has Lost Its Soul.</p><p></strong>Silicon Valley once promised to solve many of the world's problems with a technological revolution. But now, the tech hub is the center of much scrutiny, and for many, that scrutiny is warranted. From privacy violations to flawed business models to a lack of diversity and representation, Silicon Valley has seemingly betrayed its idealism. And though technological progress has notably enriched a few, Silicon Valley has failed to deliver its promise to all. Has the prioritization of profits and conformity of thought corrupted its original "do good" agenda? Proponents argue no: Silicon Valley's critics are simply overreacting. After all, it is still the center of innovation, and the tech giants have revolutionized the way we think, shop, communicate, and experience our lives for the better. Do big tech's detractors simply expect too much from lucrative corporations? Or has Silicon Valley lost its soul?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>An IQ2US Thanksgiving Tradition</title>
			<itunes:title>An IQ2US Thanksgiving Tradition</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>40:51</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/c127a670-e12f-11e8-9e6a-5f762cd2f1ff/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c127a670-e12f-11e8-9e6a-5f762cd2f1ff</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52946</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52946</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zsJ4I+XJ5/4h8SNxxJD/OeQEfDvOOX9ibEZtNi8xrfHnYsL8cKTfrMhKkJVOfv45Uk/fKiGqnJjc5A5tMfWMSuA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With former National Public Radio CEO, Ken Stern</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/73f05e56aab36641d93d17084437d6cc.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Last year, our host John Donvan sat down with Ken Stern, the former National Public Radio CEO, to discuss his book "Republican Like Me: How I Left the Liberal Bubble and Learned to Love the Right, " which chronicles this lifelong liberal's journey through conservative communities and ideas. Ken sat in on Steve Bannon’s radio show, rallied with the Tea Party, spent Sundays in evangelical churches, and went boar hunting in Texas. The result? A new respect for the conservatives he once demonized and optimism for the state of American partisan politics. </p><p>Join our host and moderator in revisiting this conversation a year later. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Last year, our host John Donvan sat down with Ken Stern, the former National Public Radio CEO, to discuss his book "Republican Like Me: How I Left the Liberal Bubble and Learned to Love the Right, " which chronicles this lifelong liberal's journey through conservative communities and ideas. Ken sat in on Steve Bannon’s radio show, rallied with the Tea Party, spent Sundays in evangelical churches, and went boar hunting in Texas. The result? A new respect for the conservatives he once demonized and optimism for the state of American partisan politics. </p><p>Join our host and moderator in revisiting this conversation a year later. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#158 - Is Trump Bad for Comedy?</title>
			<itunes:title>#158 - Is Trump Bad for Comedy?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:29</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/db8e57a2-e11b-11e8-be73-dbbe2f2baf2d/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">db8e57a2-e11b-11e8-be73-dbbe2f2baf2d</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52947</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52947</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zR/3GUYClmwxPjqRWw9z1lo4YhtE7tojLElyrpMzT1M5qdkFjSxdoSqyXSd38ushFg0+tjdPWAMaOHT10q/TfVA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[With P.J. O'Rourke, Kurt Andersen, Sara Schaefer, and Billy Kimball]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>158</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/b434e59d89ba42f3f1d3c2f38336b663.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Trump is Bad for Comedy</strong></p><p>From the opening skit on “Saturday Night Live” to “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” to the pages of The Onion, President Trump has become the face of comedy. Some comedians and writers argue that in the Trump era, satire has become more challenging and jokes have become cheap.  Trump, according to his critics, has normalized the absurd and the nature of political satire in a post-truth world. But others disagree; they argue that the president serves up comedy-gold every day, making their jobs – and the laughs they seek to elicit – easier than ever before. And, they argue, comedy is much more “woke” than it used to be, with late-night hosts and comedians playing a pivotal role in the fight for social justice. Is the president killing comedy? Or is he making the funny business ever more relevant?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Trump is Bad for Comedy</strong></p><p>From the opening skit on “Saturday Night Live” to “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” to the pages of The Onion, President Trump has become the face of comedy. Some comedians and writers argue that in the Trump era, satire has become more challenging and jokes have become cheap.  Trump, according to his critics, has normalized the absurd and the nature of political satire in a post-truth world. But others disagree; they argue that the president serves up comedy-gold every day, making their jobs – and the laughs they seek to elicit – easier than ever before. And, they argue, comedy is much more “woke” than it used to be, with late-night hosts and comedians playing a pivotal role in the fight for social justice. Is the president killing comedy? Or is he making the funny business ever more relevant?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#157 - Will Progressive Populism Save The Democratic Party?</title>
			<itunes:title>#157 - Will Progressive Populism Save The Democratic Party?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8add5650-1d99-11e8-b5cf-73e8d3360d44/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8add5650-1d99-11e8-b5cf-73e8d3360d44</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52948</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52948</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9ziTyzzcyC/9ukGqOemSgxYnRsK4L6Wl2VKuN6OElZ8xVpqc21SchhKJZ8N2s9xAw2apy0W1e9mNWP/yvxIWbPdw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Karine Jean-Pierre, Jonathan Cowan, Jeff Weaver, and Steven Rattner</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>157</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/43f5784198479ebf111bef9aa182a168.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Progressive Populism Will Save The Democratic Party</p><p></strong>As Democratic leaders and strategists gear up for the 2018 and 2020 elections, the party stands at a crossroads. For progressive populists, the path forward is clear: Democrats must get back in touch with the party’s working-class roots by championing a specific set of policies, including Medicare for all, free public college tuition, a guaranteed federal jobs program, and housing as a human right. They say this strategy is key to winning back disillusioned working-class voters and to regaining power in Washington and beyond. But others view this as a dangerous path. They argue that a handful of high-profile progressive wins have been overhyped by the media and, rather than make promises that may be impossible to execute in this political climate, Democrats should champion centrist, economically viable policies that will win elections and solidify the base. How can the Democratic Party, out of power and outnumbered in Washington D.C. and state capitals across the nation, bring itself out of the political wilderness?</p><p>Cast your vote on the motion: http://smarturl.it/DemDebateVote</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Progressive Populism Will Save The Democratic Party</p><p></strong>As Democratic leaders and strategists gear up for the 2018 and 2020 elections, the party stands at a crossroads. For progressive populists, the path forward is clear: Democrats must get back in touch with the party’s working-class roots by championing a specific set of policies, including Medicare for all, free public college tuition, a guaranteed federal jobs program, and housing as a human right. They say this strategy is key to winning back disillusioned working-class voters and to regaining power in Washington and beyond. But others view this as a dangerous path. They argue that a handful of high-profile progressive wins have been overhyped by the media and, rather than make promises that may be impossible to execute in this political climate, Democrats should champion centrist, economically viable policies that will win elections and solidify the base. How can the Democratic Party, out of power and outnumbered in Washington D.C. and state capitals across the nation, bring itself out of the political wilderness?</p><p>Cast your vote on the motion: http://smarturl.it/DemDebateVote</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#156 - Will Retail Alliances Fix the U.S. Health Care System?</title>
			<itunes:title>#156 - Will Retail Alliances Fix the U.S. Health Care System?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>54:18</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8ad937b4-1d99-11e8-b5cf-e3ba7fa7f143/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8ad937b4-1d99-11e8-b5cf-e3ba7fa7f143</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52949</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52949</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zLKWiUnBrCyN2HbDa1tGxWGLmgPN/5tR+RFHjDAFNXDW2d4WszrujOjdRTzOYE8MPINqa+AfBTcKTELy/itv0Rg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Dr. Rajaie Batniji, Dr. Lisa Bielamowicz, W. Gregg Slager, and Rosemarie Day</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>156</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/0d166700d53db0cec9fb2d23c6c74506.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Retail Alliances – Not Washington – Will Save the U.S. Health Care System</strong></p><p>Last year, Intelligence Squared U.S. and the Mayo Clinic brought to the stage a bold inquiry about whether health care in the United States is terminally broken. And this year, we’re picking up where that discussion left off, against the backdrop of corporate behemoths announcing mergers that, they say, are sure to shake up health care – from the Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway, and JPMorgan Chase venture, to the CVS-Aetna deal, to the Humana-Walgreens partnership, and more. But while these superpower alliances are making a splash in the headlines, will they actually be able to disrupt, and save, U.S. health care? Proponents argue that the bargaining power and data competencies of these retailers will squeeze middlemen out of an inefficient supply chain and bring more transparency to health care pricing. But others argue that the promise of these novel efforts is overstated or misguided, particularly because U.S. health care is so complex and deeply rooted. Will consumer-focused models and employer-led initiatives lead to better and less expensive outcomes?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Retail Alliances – Not Washington – Will Save the U.S. Health Care System</strong></p><p>Last year, Intelligence Squared U.S. and the Mayo Clinic brought to the stage a bold inquiry about whether health care in the United States is terminally broken. And this year, we’re picking up where that discussion left off, against the backdrop of corporate behemoths announcing mergers that, they say, are sure to shake up health care – from the Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway, and JPMorgan Chase venture, to the CVS-Aetna deal, to the Humana-Walgreens partnership, and more. But while these superpower alliances are making a splash in the headlines, will they actually be able to disrupt, and save, U.S. health care? Proponents argue that the bargaining power and data competencies of these retailers will squeeze middlemen out of an inefficient supply chain and bring more transparency to health care pricing. But others argue that the promise of these novel efforts is overstated or misguided, particularly because U.S. health care is so complex and deeply rooted. Will consumer-focused models and employer-led initiatives lead to better and less expensive outcomes?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#155 - Unresolved: U.S. National Security</title>
			<itunes:title>#155 - Unresolved: U.S. National Security</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>54:23</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8ad552c0-1d99-11e8-b5cf-33f063f2b003/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8ad552c0-1d99-11e8-b5cf-33f063f2b003</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5294a</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5294a</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zAPo49GwQsXzGussyuXQ4aI2RTK1GuoJ5EcvZwa7t2JtC5uYClzc4OsU+Ne11M7XMZwkzucU+xQW7Zs658OYxWA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Derek Chollet, John J. Mearsheimer, Stephen F. Cohen, Kori Schake, and Reuel Marc Gerecht</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>155</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/25f6c95bf598ba092f1de0f02e4b0a5d.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Three Motions: Is NATO No Longer Fit for Purpose? Is the Russia Threat Overblown? Is It Time to Take a Hard Line on Iran?</p><p></strong>For the United States, tensions are rising with both allies and adversaries. Rogue states are racing to master new technologies and create weapons of mass destruction. And faith in international institutions is seemingly deteriorating. What does this all mean for U.S. national security? Staged in our "unresolved" format, five esteemed foreign policy thought leaders will argue for or against a number of motions revolving around some of America’s most pressing national security issues, including: Is NATO no longer fit for purpose? Is the Russia threat overblown? And is it time to take a hard line on Iran?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Three Motions: Is NATO No Longer Fit for Purpose? Is the Russia Threat Overblown? Is It Time to Take a Hard Line on Iran?</p><p></strong>For the United States, tensions are rising with both allies and adversaries. Rogue states are racing to master new technologies and create weapons of mass destruction. And faith in international institutions is seemingly deteriorating. What does this all mean for U.S. national security? Staged in our "unresolved" format, five esteemed foreign policy thought leaders will argue for or against a number of motions revolving around some of America’s most pressing national security issues, including: Is NATO no longer fit for purpose? Is the Russia threat overblown? And is it time to take a hard line on Iran?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Join IQ2US Live in New York</title>
			<itunes:title>Join IQ2US Live in New York</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>4:34</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/0f741e9a-b9d4-11e8-9661-c3283005dd0f/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">0f741e9a-b9d4-11e8-9661-c3283005dd0f</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5294b</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5294b</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zxBdq8RXU8oNnHDaxlVF2ELLy9LiffLQTh4+DK0z46TTdNnHIpQy60ajt8Umj1xGEtyiueRCWt8Wp4qMzj3bc9w==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Trump's America on the World Stage]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>trailer</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This Thursday, September 20th, we’re launching our fall series with an evening of debate on the state and future of American national security. </p><p> Set in our “unresolved” format, five debaters will fly solo on the following resolutions:</p><p> <strong></p><p> It’s Time to Take a Hard Line on Iran.</p><p> NATO Is No Longer Fit for Purpose.</p><p> The Russia Threat Is Overblown.</strong></p><p> _____</p><p> Tickets available here: <a href="http://smarturl.it/NationalSecurityTix">http://smarturl.it/NationalSecurityTix</a> </p><p> Use code FRIENDS30 for 30% off</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>This Thursday, September 20th, we’re launching our fall series with an evening of debate on the state and future of American national security. </p><p> Set in our “unresolved” format, five debaters will fly solo on the following resolutions:</p><p> <strong></p><p> It’s Time to Take a Hard Line on Iran.</p><p> NATO Is No Longer Fit for Purpose.</p><p> The Russia Threat Is Overblown.</strong></p><p> _____</p><p> Tickets available here: <a href="http://smarturl.it/NationalSecurityTix">http://smarturl.it/NationalSecurityTix</a> </p><p> Use code FRIENDS30 for 30% off</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#154 - Has Globalization Undermined the American Working Class?</title>
			<itunes:title>#154 - Has Globalization Undermined the American Working Class?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:31</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8ac3beac-1d99-11e8-b5cf-db9b301234d7/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8ac3beac-1d99-11e8-b5cf-db9b301234d7</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5294c</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5294c</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zJH+JbSu4621NRYYTypBr+kfRa5p7OXfgLOdFjVU7D9//OSXSzTvTPn5sxYINDtv1tWqXDQcUCJf6VqcTwvYjuQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Thea Lee, Jason Furman, Jared Bernstein, and James Manyika</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>154</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/0e06fa2470fee8319487a27bc3c4b943.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Globalization Has Undermined America's Working Class</strong></p><p>Globalization ushered in an era of free trade, fluid borders, and unparalleled corporate profits. For its proponents, the global integration of states and their economies was a political and economic win that created a wealth of opportunities for workers and consumers around the world. But in the United States, jobs are disappearing. From construction zones to clerical offices to coal mines, the American working class is losing ground. Is globalization to blame? Did the push toward global integration leave our most vulnerable populations behind, making them the losers of this grand experiment? Or is globalization being used as a scapegoat for a wider range of failed public policies and unprecedented advances in technology? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Globalization Has Undermined America's Working Class</strong></p><p>Globalization ushered in an era of free trade, fluid borders, and unparalleled corporate profits. For its proponents, the global integration of states and their economies was a political and economic win that created a wealth of opportunities for workers and consumers around the world. But in the United States, jobs are disappearing. From construction zones to clerical offices to coal mines, the American working class is losing ground. Is globalization to blame? Did the push toward global integration leave our most vulnerable populations behind, making them the losers of this grand experiment? Or is globalization being used as a scapegoat for a wider range of failed public policies and unprecedented advances in technology? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#153 - Is Social Media Good For Democracy?</title>
			<itunes:title>#153 - Is Social Media Good For Democracy?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8abf123a-1d99-11e8-b5cf-07dc9947cc48/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8abf123a-1d99-11e8-b5cf-07dc9947cc48</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5294d</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5294d</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zGiJ1E7YtA2yU885CEExEyCBMl1UUMNlOdpqKW8IaWlTxy9nMaZpEFp3aK8YKB52Komt1H8brAMtnjPaeb1Fwxw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Jeff Jarvis, Franklin Foer, Emily Parker, and Roger McNamee</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>153</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/0bf477c11e1cf27d2f7100bb2ae38719.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Social Media Is Good for Democracy</strong></p><p>By connecting people across the world for free, platforms like Twitter and Facebook set the stage for a promising digital revolution, providing tools that helped foster global friendships, break down long-standing barriers that kept people and ideas from being heard, and served as the ultimate democratizing force for information. Now, lawmakers in the U.S. and beyond are reeling with questions of how to prevent the spread of digital political propaganda and protect citizens' personal privacy online. Critics argue that rather than uniting and informing, social media deepens social and political divisions and erodes trust in the democratic process. Will the power of social media yet be harnessed and used as an unprecedented force for good in the world? Or do systemic platform flaws pose an irreversible threat to the world's democratic institutions?  </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Social Media Is Good for Democracy</strong></p><p>By connecting people across the world for free, platforms like Twitter and Facebook set the stage for a promising digital revolution, providing tools that helped foster global friendships, break down long-standing barriers that kept people and ideas from being heard, and served as the ultimate democratizing force for information. Now, lawmakers in the U.S. and beyond are reeling with questions of how to prevent the spread of digital political propaganda and protect citizens' personal privacy online. Critics argue that rather than uniting and informing, social media deepens social and political divisions and erodes trust in the democratic process. Will the power of social media yet be harnessed and used as an unprecedented force for good in the world? Or do systemic platform flaws pose an irreversible threat to the world's democratic institutions?  </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#152 - Trigger Warning: Are Safe Spaces Dangerous?</title>
			<itunes:title>#152 - Trigger Warning: Are Safe Spaces Dangerous?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8aba8918-1d99-11e8-b5cf-f3296ee6cb32/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8aba8918-1d99-11e8-b5cf-f3296ee6cb32</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5294e</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5294e</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z/s7L5bW7j2dTQnc5RUrfmlCLQuYzYNXb2RoX+RfcgtN31EdNMHUfiSp0+ZJKGFHgt4KjZxV4E9CzQrygEv/8cw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With David L. Hudson  Jr., Ashutosh Bhagwat, Suzanne Nossel, and Michael S. Roth</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>152</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/4b9b67339b1ab8889cba9ec211c6b631.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Debate: Trigger Warning: Safe Spaces are Dangerous</p><p></strong>Long hailed as bastions of intellectual development and ground zero for the free and spirited exchange of ideas, today's universities have come under attack by those who argue that a new generation of students and administrators are trading in academia's most cherished values for political correctness and inclusion. At the heart of this debate is the question of safe spaces, how we define them, and whether they aid or hinder intellectual inquiry. Deeply rooted in social justice movements of the past, these spaces promise a reprieve from bigotry and oppression by allowing today's students - the most culturally and racially diverse in history - the opportunity to express themselves in an empathetic environment. But to their critics, safe spaces pose a dire threat to free speech and undermine the resilience of a generation. Are safe spaces dangerously coddling young minds? Or are they a legitimate and necessary component of modern education? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Debate: Trigger Warning: Safe Spaces are Dangerous</p><p></strong>Long hailed as bastions of intellectual development and ground zero for the free and spirited exchange of ideas, today's universities have come under attack by those who argue that a new generation of students and administrators are trading in academia's most cherished values for political correctness and inclusion. At the heart of this debate is the question of safe spaces, how we define them, and whether they aid or hinder intellectual inquiry. Deeply rooted in social justice movements of the past, these spaces promise a reprieve from bigotry and oppression by allowing today's students - the most culturally and racially diverse in history - the opportunity to express themselves in an empathetic environment. But to their critics, safe spaces pose a dire threat to free speech and undermine the resilience of a generation. Are safe spaces dangerously coddling young minds? Or are they a legitimate and necessary component of modern education? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#151 - Will Automation Crash Democracy?</title>
			<itunes:title>#151 - Will Automation Crash Democracy?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:32</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/bd78b990-1bfc-11e8-8c62-877dd4d8e490/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">bd78b990-1bfc-11e8-8c62-877dd4d8e490</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5294f</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5294f</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zgkBeSWCBeiJsLbP9tMiKY1uQC6fxPsuexInoeG3d96qlSJNRPo07SIpwEU0+zH0ZU6cbDWJZZJV4PeyyZbLTXg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Ian Bremmer, Andrew Keen, Yascha Mounk, and Alina Polyakova</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>151</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e079d19d3137213a1a568df09d79fced.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Automation Will Crash Democracy</strong></p><p>Around the world, technology is disrupting the workforce, with automation poised to displace humans in the fields of medicine, agriculture, and beyond. Will the rise of robots fuel a new wave of “us versus them” populism capable of undermining democracy?</p><p>For some, the answer is yes. They argue that as people lose jobs to robots, the gap between the rich and poor widens, distrust in government and democratic institutions grows, and populist ideas become more attractive to those who feel left behind. The importance of work trumps the importance of democracy, leaving a clear path for authoritarians to rise under nationalist messages that pit groups of people against one another. But others paint a different picture: They argue that humans have adapted to – and benefited from – new innovations for centuries. From the advent of water and steam power to computers, work has changed, but never disappeared. And as automation drives higher productivity growth, humans can reach their full potential and pursue societal innovation, allowing more citizens to feel fulfilled and strengthening democracy on the whole.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Automation Will Crash Democracy</strong></p><p>Around the world, technology is disrupting the workforce, with automation poised to displace humans in the fields of medicine, agriculture, and beyond. Will the rise of robots fuel a new wave of “us versus them” populism capable of undermining democracy?</p><p>For some, the answer is yes. They argue that as people lose jobs to robots, the gap between the rich and poor widens, distrust in government and democratic institutions grows, and populist ideas become more attractive to those who feel left behind. The importance of work trumps the importance of democracy, leaving a clear path for authoritarians to rise under nationalist messages that pit groups of people against one another. But others paint a different picture: They argue that humans have adapted to – and benefited from – new innovations for centuries. From the advent of water and steam power to computers, work has changed, but never disappeared. And as automation drives higher productivity growth, humans can reach their full potential and pursue societal innovation, allowing more citizens to feel fulfilled and strengthening democracy on the whole.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#150 - Can Negotiations Denuclearize North Korea?</title>
			<itunes:title>#150 - Can Negotiations Denuclearize North Korea?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:51</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/bd7326f6-1bfc-11e8-8c62-97db086ab87d/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">bd7326f6-1bfc-11e8-8c62-97db086ab87d</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52950</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52950</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z3lA84Mr7UY7NxSCDbVp1Wn0kQ2hTc+h7O/Bl6L9MStgRz0BBLjgDc6yp83SiNeIc3BSFKDtwRQkXXgkHqgSMXg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Suki Kim, Suzanne DiMaggio, Sue Mi Terry, Bonnie Jenkins, and Mira Rapp-Hooper</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>150</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/8c8f3771d8a3bd5feb03e98305b94d09.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Negotiations Can Denuclearize North Korea</p><p></strong></p><p>Will all of the recent goodwill gestures between North and South Korea lead to the one thing Washington wants most? Can a deal be struck that denuclearizes North Korea? And what will they want in exchange for giving up that leverage? </p><p><em>Presented in partnership with Georgetown University, LIVE at the first Georgetown University Women’s Forum.</em></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Negotiations Can Denuclearize North Korea</p><p></strong></p><p>Will all of the recent goodwill gestures between North and South Korea lead to the one thing Washington wants most? Can a deal be struck that denuclearizes North Korea? And what will they want in exchange for giving up that leverage? </p><p><em>Presented in partnership with Georgetown University, LIVE at the first Georgetown University Women’s Forum.</em></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#149 - Is Bitcoin More Than A Bubble?</title>
			<itunes:title>#149 - Is Bitcoin More Than A Bubble?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 12:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:24</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/bd6d0d3e-1bfc-11e8-8c62-f7a6fc9a5d1b/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">bd6d0d3e-1bfc-11e8-8c62-f7a6fc9a5d1b</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52951</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52951</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zEMTTtgz+MK4Hh3ws4C5FqF5lNjLFBlEKcUWxgx+NgY1wiLDkTtYsL610z9uWAtQNNV0tdpwOy6veY+WvnHOaWA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Patrick Byrne, Eric Posner, Tim Draper, and Gillian Tett</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>149</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/7c031cb864b29e5b90f8638a2dc5079d.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Bitcoin is More Than a Bubble and Here to Stay.</p><p></strong>Is Bitcoin here to stay, or is it a bubble waiting to pop? Less than a decade old, Bitcoin is worth billions. The cryptocurrency promises to revolutionize global finance by placing control of currency in the hands of users, not nations, and make financial exchanges more transparent, efficient, and democratic. And it seems to be taking hold: Earlier this year both the Cboe and CME debuted Bitcoin futures. But is Bitcoin really a safe bet? Proponents say the hype around the cryptocurrency is warranted, and previous critics – including executives at JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs – are increasingly jumping on the Bitcoin (block)train. On the other hand, skeptics suggest this highly volatile digital currency offers a platform for illicit activity, including money laundering and trafficking of humans and drugs, free from government oversight and regulation. And, they argue, Bitcoin has no intrinsic value – the price is based on market enthusiasm rather than actual utility. This debate is presented in partnership with the Adam Smith Society. The <a href="http://adamsmithsociety.com/">Adam Smith Society</a> — a project of the Manhattan Institute — is an expansive, chapter-based network of MBA students, professionals, and business leaders who work to foster debate about the moral, social, and economic benefits of capitalism.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Bitcoin is More Than a Bubble and Here to Stay.</p><p></strong>Is Bitcoin here to stay, or is it a bubble waiting to pop? Less than a decade old, Bitcoin is worth billions. The cryptocurrency promises to revolutionize global finance by placing control of currency in the hands of users, not nations, and make financial exchanges more transparent, efficient, and democratic. And it seems to be taking hold: Earlier this year both the Cboe and CME debuted Bitcoin futures. But is Bitcoin really a safe bet? Proponents say the hype around the cryptocurrency is warranted, and previous critics – including executives at JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs – are increasingly jumping on the Bitcoin (block)train. On the other hand, skeptics suggest this highly volatile digital currency offers a platform for illicit activity, including money laundering and trafficking of humans and drugs, free from government oversight and regulation. And, they argue, Bitcoin has no intrinsic value – the price is based on market enthusiasm rather than actual utility. This debate is presented in partnership with the Adam Smith Society. The <a href="http://adamsmithsociety.com/">Adam Smith Society</a> — a project of the Manhattan Institute — is an expansive, chapter-based network of MBA students, professionals, and business leaders who work to foster debate about the moral, social, and economic benefits of capitalism.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#148 - Should Net Neutrality Be Saved?</title>
			<itunes:title>#148 - Should Net Neutrality Be Saved?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>54:05</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/bd6768de-1bfc-11e8-8c62-e3b3b4bd8ad5/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">bd6768de-1bfc-11e8-8c62-e3b3b4bd8ad5</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52952</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52952</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zpj4JRw7qt/1a/imZJA9dU2al6niMRrvpChD/REx7dXmLVDa+D5x0Vfw/luSF/PFN2vsrl+P0IyodtKe1saMr4w==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Mitchell Baker, Nick Gillespie, Tom Wheeler, and Michael Katz</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>148</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/651a472ff224c8f22fae6fe65039958c.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Preserve Net Neutrality: All Data is Created Equal.</strong></p><p>What if a single policy could impact American democracy, culture, and competitiveness?  What if that policy might either empower citizens and consumers, or burden them?  And what if the decision on that policy sparked a frenzy of legislative proposals, judicial challenges, and citizen outrage, all across the country?</p><p>The Federal Communications Commission’s decision to end net neutrality regulations has fueled a national debate about the future of the internet.  Adopted in 2015, net neutrality promised to preserve the democratic spirit of the web by ensuring that all data would be treated equally, regardless of where it originated. Under these regulations, internet service providers (ISPs) such as Verizon, Comcast and AT&amp;T, the corporate giants who deliver the internet into our homes, could supply web infrastructure, but could not preference how data passed through it.  Denying them that power, supporters argue, remains critical to ensuring that users and content-creators can discover ideas and information without censorship, or charges, from these prospective gatekeepers.  After all, no person should have to pay for every video streamed on YouTube; no startup should be hobbled against established companies who buy faster access to consumers; and no minority voice should have its ideas throttled by wealthier interests.</p><p>On the other hand, net neutrality opponents argue that the genius of the Internet has been its individually driven, organic development, free from the heavy hand of so-called net neutrality.  These burdensome regulations constitute dangerous governmental overreach, stifle innovation, and spike costs for both consumers and providers.  The result, they maintain, will be a less interesting, less democratic, less innovative web.  Moreover, Americans will enjoy uninterrupted access to their favorite sites – without net neutrality – because ISPs make more money from an open, rather than closed, internet.  Consequently, the backlash against the FCC’s decision is overblown, and ending net neutrality is the right policy for the future of America’s internet.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Preserve Net Neutrality: All Data is Created Equal.</strong></p><p>What if a single policy could impact American democracy, culture, and competitiveness?  What if that policy might either empower citizens and consumers, or burden them?  And what if the decision on that policy sparked a frenzy of legislative proposals, judicial challenges, and citizen outrage, all across the country?</p><p>The Federal Communications Commission’s decision to end net neutrality regulations has fueled a national debate about the future of the internet.  Adopted in 2015, net neutrality promised to preserve the democratic spirit of the web by ensuring that all data would be treated equally, regardless of where it originated. Under these regulations, internet service providers (ISPs) such as Verizon, Comcast and AT&amp;T, the corporate giants who deliver the internet into our homes, could supply web infrastructure, but could not preference how data passed through it.  Denying them that power, supporters argue, remains critical to ensuring that users and content-creators can discover ideas and information without censorship, or charges, from these prospective gatekeepers.  After all, no person should have to pay for every video streamed on YouTube; no startup should be hobbled against established companies who buy faster access to consumers; and no minority voice should have its ideas throttled by wealthier interests.</p><p>On the other hand, net neutrality opponents argue that the genius of the Internet has been its individually driven, organic development, free from the heavy hand of so-called net neutrality.  These burdensome regulations constitute dangerous governmental overreach, stifle innovation, and spike costs for both consumers and providers.  The result, they maintain, will be a less interesting, less democratic, less innovative web.  Moreover, Americans will enjoy uninterrupted access to their favorite sites – without net neutrality – because ISPs make more money from an open, rather than closed, internet.  Consequently, the backlash against the FCC’s decision is overblown, and ending net neutrality is the right policy for the future of America’s internet.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#147 - As We Evolve, Do We Need God Less?</title>
			<itunes:title>#147 - As We Evolve, Do We Need God Less?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>54:25</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/bd60876c-1bfc-11e8-8c62-670c4ef5a5b7/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">bd60876c-1bfc-11e8-8c62-670c4ef5a5b7</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52953</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52953</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zbFzrYEXbM2rqoQ3GqHbeQ0MgkLz4ZxF61BP8PX/lNcY0Yc5P3gsxVgR61/nRepAnuTt6EbZhk+gjyieUBieitw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Heather Berlin, Dr. Deepak Chopra, Michael Shermer, and Dr. Anoop Kumar</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>147</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/24f2299308857eb11e0a5ff2c44e54d6.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: The More We Evolve The Less We Need God.</strong></p><p>Does God have a place in 21st century human affairs? Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine, and cognitive neuroscientist Heather Berlin team up to argue for the motion, "The More We Evolve, The Less We Need God." On the other side is integrative medicine advocate Dr. Deepak Chopra and ER physician Dr. Anoop Kumar.</p><p>To buy tickets to our live show in Chicago on April 17th, visit IQ2US.org.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: The More We Evolve The Less We Need God.</strong></p><p>Does God have a place in 21st century human affairs? Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine, and cognitive neuroscientist Heather Berlin team up to argue for the motion, "The More We Evolve, The Less We Need God." On the other side is integrative medicine advocate Dr. Deepak Chopra and ER physician Dr. Anoop Kumar.</p><p>To buy tickets to our live show in Chicago on April 17th, visit IQ2US.org.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#146 - Does Humanitarian Intervention Do More Harm Than Good?</title>
			<itunes:title>#146 - Does Humanitarian Intervention Do More Harm Than Good?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:32</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/bd57140c-1bfc-11e8-8c62-7fe61a36b5d4/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">bd57140c-1bfc-11e8-8c62-7fe61a36b5d4</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52954</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52954</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zsP1VybgRFMN2PCqwJR0xlNhjCVlJxGiQYZn0sSCU6xV4SU+orBqQn2rKlMvVVTplOmzEkGO6YnpMuWZEEJqfkw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>The debaters are Frank Ledwidge, Bernard Kouchner, Rajan Menon, Rajan Menon, and Kori Schake.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>146</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/98fe207b4d34308afdee1cec81a59843.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Humanitarian Intervention Does More Harm than Good.</p><p></strong>The international community currently faces a global refugee crisis and mass atrocities in Iraq, Myanmar, Syria, Yemen, and beyond. How should the West respond? Proponents of humanitarian intervention – the use of force to halt human rights abuses – argue that the world’s most powerful militaries have a responsibility to protect innocent civilians around the world. Beyond saving lives, they argue, intervention deters would-be abusers and ensures global stability, thereby strengthening the liberal world order. But opponents argue that military intervention is thinly veiled Western imperialism, and subsequently, an assault on state sovereignty. And, it’s ineffective: the West, with its military might, increases the death toll and worsens the conflicts it sets out to solve. Further, given recent waves of populism in the U.S., France, and U.K., they suggest that Western nations should spend their time looking inward rather than policing activity around the world.  This debate is presented in partnership with The German Marshall Fund's Brussels Forum, broadcast live from Brussels, Belgium.</p><p>The More We Evolve, The Less We Need God: http://smarturl.it/ReligionDebateTix</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Humanitarian Intervention Does More Harm than Good.</p><p></strong>The international community currently faces a global refugee crisis and mass atrocities in Iraq, Myanmar, Syria, Yemen, and beyond. How should the West respond? Proponents of humanitarian intervention – the use of force to halt human rights abuses – argue that the world’s most powerful militaries have a responsibility to protect innocent civilians around the world. Beyond saving lives, they argue, intervention deters would-be abusers and ensures global stability, thereby strengthening the liberal world order. But opponents argue that military intervention is thinly veiled Western imperialism, and subsequently, an assault on state sovereignty. And, it’s ineffective: the West, with its military might, increases the death toll and worsens the conflicts it sets out to solve. Further, given recent waves of populism in the U.S., France, and U.K., they suggest that Western nations should spend their time looking inward rather than policing activity around the world.  This debate is presented in partnership with The German Marshall Fund's Brussels Forum, broadcast live from Brussels, Belgium.</p><p>The More We Evolve, The Less We Need God: http://smarturl.it/ReligionDebateTix</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#145 - Have Dating Apps Killed Romance?</title>
			<itunes:title>#145 - Have Dating Apps Killed Romance?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:13</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/976a6a52-a454-11e7-b325-ab6af2ed8eab/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">976a6a52-a454-11e7-b325-ab6af2ed8eab</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52955</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52955</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z8eLwdy+SfxVzZgIgnHDZVTqw4iRxl1KIMatQXv1bo0P1W3cU5lqhh4Dv1nlPaSJrAvA+JXs5Q+8UMkTTydLgBQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Eric Klinenberg, Helen Fisher, Manoush Zomorodi, and Tom Jacques, and a conversation with special guest, Daniel Jones</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>145</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/934cec37efe558ee0ec995d86cb9fdc5.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Swipe Left: Dating Apps Have Killed Romance</p><p></strong>Every day millions of people turn to dating apps to find love. To date, more than 49 million Americans have given digital dating a try and the companies facilitating these matches are raking in billions. But are dating apps really designed to promote long-lasting romance? Apps like Tinder and Bumble make finding a date as easy as swiping right, while digital platforms like Match.com and OkCupid use specialized algorithms to help users find the perfect partner, regardless of age or personal preferences. Further, a range of niche sites connect people with highly specific interests, whether it’s single parenthood, a gluten-free lifestyle, or a devotion to Ayn Rand. But some argue that online dating is rife with sexism, racism, and misogyny, and that dating apps ultimately create a culture that prioritizes sex over committed and lasting love. After all, why settle on one match when there may be someone better just a swipe away? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Swipe Left: Dating Apps Have Killed Romance</p><p></strong>Every day millions of people turn to dating apps to find love. To date, more than 49 million Americans have given digital dating a try and the companies facilitating these matches are raking in billions. But are dating apps really designed to promote long-lasting romance? Apps like Tinder and Bumble make finding a date as easy as swiping right, while digital platforms like Match.com and OkCupid use specialized algorithms to help users find the perfect partner, regardless of age or personal preferences. Further, a range of niche sites connect people with highly specific interests, whether it’s single parenthood, a gluten-free lifestyle, or a devotion to Ayn Rand. But some argue that online dating is rife with sexism, racism, and misogyny, and that dating apps ultimately create a culture that prioritizes sex over committed and lasting love. After all, why settle on one match when there may be someone better just a swipe away? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[#144 - Unresolved: America's Economic Outlook]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[#144 - Unresolved: America's Economic Outlook]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/97630b68-a454-11e7-b325-a7cd5e57409f/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">97630b68-a454-11e7-b325-a7cd5e57409f</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52956</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52956</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zHdcZp4x3oOxR+BYgwgV94GzHOJxihy/jSeMaFWu66hoNmA/ccc0HULaS7ozPhldDyyxvDlqzYCT2xoEC7dWgcA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Jason Furman, Simon Johnson, Stephen Moore, Dambisa Moyo, and Gillian Tett.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>144</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/973300637c1a30487de7768bc7c4e0c4.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Three Motions: Is deregulation driving the booming economy? Can the Republican tax bill spur economic growth? And is the stock market too high? </p><p></strong>By most accounts, the American economy is booming — manufacturing is at a 13-year high, unemployment is at a 16-year low, and both the stock market and consumer confidence are soaring. But just what is driving this upturn? And can Americans trust that current economic conditions will hold up in the months ahead? In our season premiere, five esteemed economic thinkers debate the state of the American economy, from tax cuts to trade policy</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Three Motions: Is deregulation driving the booming economy? Can the Republican tax bill spur economic growth? And is the stock market too high? </p><p></strong>By most accounts, the American economy is booming — manufacturing is at a 13-year high, unemployment is at a 16-year low, and both the stock market and consumer confidence are soaring. But just what is driving this upturn? And can Americans trust that current economic conditions will hold up in the months ahead? In our season premiere, five esteemed economic thinkers debate the state of the American economy, from tax cuts to trade policy</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#143 - Do Liberals Hold the Moral High Ground?</title>
			<itunes:title>#143 - Do Liberals Hold the Moral High Ground?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/7146b702-7ebd-11e7-8e51-671254d04674/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7146b702-7ebd-11e7-8e51-671254d04674</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52957</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52957</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9za25rrVAllBdF8Yfv5XCrPyw4JK9XhwAIRuI6iBE2vHteDxEU8mJiHallgpcrufKG8sAiTdIGKi0Faf8HvSEJOg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Howard Dean, David Brooks, Melissa Harris-Perry, and Robert George</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>143</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/6d88a71c03303258e74f6598df9151c7.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Liberals hold the moral high ground.</strong></p><p>Do conservative or liberal philosophies lead to more just outcomes? Opposing moral philosophies have long fueled debate about America’s policy goals and national identity. For conservatives, morality is grounded in ideals such as patriotism, including a respect for order and authority; fairness and liberty in the sense that an individual’s actions yield just rewards, or consequences; and reverence for the sanctity of religious and moral tradition. Liberals place moral emphasis on caring: for the poor, the disadvantaged, and the marginalized; on fairness in the sense of redressing both historic wrongs and current inequalities of outcome; and on generosity extending beyond the bounds of nations or cultures. In today’s divisive political arena, which side best embodies the nation’s most cherished virtues? Morally speaking, is the left right?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Liberals hold the moral high ground.</strong></p><p>Do conservative or liberal philosophies lead to more just outcomes? Opposing moral philosophies have long fueled debate about America’s policy goals and national identity. For conservatives, morality is grounded in ideals such as patriotism, including a respect for order and authority; fairness and liberty in the sense that an individual’s actions yield just rewards, or consequences; and reverence for the sanctity of religious and moral tradition. Liberals place moral emphasis on caring: for the poor, the disadvantaged, and the marginalized; on fairness in the sense of redressing both historic wrongs and current inequalities of outcome; and on generosity extending beyond the bounds of nations or cultures. In today’s divisive political arena, which side best embodies the nation’s most cherished virtues? Morally speaking, is the left right?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Guns, Bibles, & Breaking Bread: A Thanksgiving Podcast]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Guns, Bibles, & Breaking Bread: A Thanksgiving Podcast]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>38:51</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/713f3234-7ebd-11e7-8e51-8f5d18032937/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">713f3234-7ebd-11e7-8e51-8f5d18032937</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52958</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52958</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zggtoW7+6cUFw4sfqTmgBoJbJ0reyPZJZb9lKarKWYoNp5NuDn3VaK7638IAry4YxZ/qTSfOdJOPSDOzmCr5X9Q==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With former National Public Radio CEO, Ken Stern</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>John Donvan sits down with Ken Stern, the former CEO of NPR, to discuss America's partisan politics and how to talk across the aisle -- and your Thanksgiving table.<em></p><p></em></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>John Donvan sits down with Ken Stern, the former CEO of NPR, to discuss America's partisan politics and how to talk across the aisle -- and your Thanksgiving table.<em></p><p></em></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#142 - Should College Athletes Be Paid?</title>
			<itunes:title>#142 - Should College Athletes Be Paid?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:00</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/7138bfc6-7ebd-11e7-8e51-37948b9b0c44/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7138bfc6-7ebd-11e7-8e51-37948b9b0c44</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52959</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52959</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zQOtl9RQQm4ptIlghdU6kNcR+Nix9zstfw6CzrJFlBqsENxUQi8ICXumKZjpm+JS3H6uauvr4k3od9wLaGsX2Mw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Joe Nocera, Christine Brennan, Andy Schwarz, and Len Elmore</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>142</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Pay College Athletes</strong></p><p>College sports is a big-money business, with football and basketball programs generating millions of dollars in revenue every year. While coaches and athletic directors in Division I programs routinely score seven-figure contracts, student-athletes are currently prohibited from sharing in the profits. Is it time to rewrite the rules in college sports and allow athletes their fair share of the profits? Or would providing monetary incentives -- above and beyond existing scholarships and career supports -- spoil the sport?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Pay College Athletes</strong></p><p>College sports is a big-money business, with football and basketball programs generating millions of dollars in revenue every year. While coaches and athletic directors in Division I programs routinely score seven-figure contracts, student-athletes are currently prohibited from sharing in the profits. Is it time to rewrite the rules in college sports and allow athletes their fair share of the profits? Or would providing monetary incentives -- above and beyond existing scholarships and career supports -- spoil the sport?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#141 - Is Western Democracy In Danger?</title>
			<itunes:title>#141 - Is Western Democracy In Danger?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:00</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/712820ee-7ebd-11e7-8e51-63ea14ed55c6/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">712820ee-7ebd-11e7-8e51-63ea14ed55c6</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5295a</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5295a</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zBi5h6Xa+0D3e4vBc7zgt2PGMwlkqc4wo/TW0e9p/AomcKd+W3RjhnTcI6ST43NpWHDeYQPo9zDaD7OgEl2E0ig==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Bernard-Henri Levy, Clive Crook, Yascha Mounk, and Kori Schake</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>141</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Western Democracy is Threatening Suicide</p><p></strong></p><p>Do populist and nationalist uprisings signal Western democracy’s certain decline? Or can recent events be seen as part of a healthy and regenerative antidote to policies that have challenged liberal institutions and marginalized the middle class? Some predict that a resilient liberal world order will rally to triumph over fear, xenophobia and fractured political parties – others say that support for autocratic alternatives is on the rise. Four leading thinkers debate the future of Western democracy.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Western Democracy is Threatening Suicide</p><p></strong></p><p>Do populist and nationalist uprisings signal Western democracy’s certain decline? Or can recent events be seen as part of a healthy and regenerative antidote to policies that have challenged liberal institutions and marginalized the middle class? Some predict that a resilient liberal world order will rally to triumph over fear, xenophobia and fractured political parties – others say that support for autocratic alternatives is on the rise. Four leading thinkers debate the future of Western democracy.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#140 - Is the U.S. Healthcare System Terminally Broken?</title>
			<itunes:title>#140 - Is the U.S. Healthcare System Terminally Broken?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:00</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/0fff1c32-9ca4-11e7-93e9-bf60bbbc7637/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">0fff1c32-9ca4-11e7-93e9-bf60bbbc7637</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5295b</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5295b</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zLY03nI3bSXJ8E8UZ63ymdAaZ612yeUIvniiVHpVorP3XLbXV+TEzGTv5dmf5QaHUIQ5HKSFPrrvW5OYR9YWkCg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Shannon Brownlee, Dr. Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Dr. Robert Pearl, and Dr. David T. Feinberg</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>140</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/7096d6750356317f9cfbfdf387d28123.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: The U.S. Healthcare System is Terminally Broken</strong></p><p>Criticized by patients, providers, and politicians alike, the United States healthcare system is hardly a crowd-pleaser. Is the most expensive health care system in the world beyond repair? </p><p>FOR</p><p>Dr. Robert Pearl, former CEO of the Permanente Medical Group</p><p>Shannon Brownless, author of <em>Overtreated: Why Too Much Medicine is Making Us Sicker and Poorer</em></p><p>AGAINST</p><p>Dr. Ezekiel Amanuel, a bioethicist and an architect of the Affordable Care Act</p><p>Dr. David T. Feinberg, CEO of Geisinger Health System</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: The U.S. Healthcare System is Terminally Broken</strong></p><p>Criticized by patients, providers, and politicians alike, the United States healthcare system is hardly a crowd-pleaser. Is the most expensive health care system in the world beyond repair? </p><p>FOR</p><p>Dr. Robert Pearl, former CEO of the Permanente Medical Group</p><p>Shannon Brownless, author of <em>Overtreated: Why Too Much Medicine is Making Us Sicker and Poorer</em></p><p>AGAINST</p><p>Dr. Ezekiel Amanuel, a bioethicist and an architect of the Affordable Care Act</p><p>Dr. David T. Feinberg, CEO of Geisinger Health System</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#139 - Face-Off with China: Foreign Policy in the Trump Era</title>
			<itunes:title>#139 - Face-Off with China: Foreign Policy in the Trump Era</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:00</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/ebaab2ae-72d9-11e7-a9c5-9ff8493d16af/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">ebaab2ae-72d9-11e7-a9c5-9ff8493d16af</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5295c</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5295c</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zGpRty3+/ycVxj9cc2zvVyxbCEFVL6SZ+pOVLvm3WxLcZlpUvrK+nFxy97Anorbup0LBxTrHvrhtllBlpM9MQjQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Gen. David H. Petraeus, Max Boot, Ian Bremmer, Elizabeth Economy, Noah Feldman, and David Shambaugh</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>139</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/7457daf8dea55f5f0ed2c9eefe5bba13.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Special: "Unresolved" Debate Format</strong></p><p>Against the backdrop of North Korea's nuclear advances and escalating regional tensions, we ask: How should the U.S. respond to its most urgent national security threats? In a wide-ranging evening of debate, General David Petraeus joins military historian Max Boot for a keynote conversation and broad look into the most pressing global challenges of the Trump era. Then, four of the world's most prominent foreign policy voices zero in on the most important strategic relationship of the twenty-first century: the United States and China. Staged with our new "Unresolved" debate format, these debaters argue for or against a number of motions including: Is Donald Trump making China great again? Is China destined for regional dominance?  And can we strike a deal with Beijing to contain North Korea’s nuclear program? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Special: "Unresolved" Debate Format</strong></p><p>Against the backdrop of North Korea's nuclear advances and escalating regional tensions, we ask: How should the U.S. respond to its most urgent national security threats? In a wide-ranging evening of debate, General David Petraeus joins military historian Max Boot for a keynote conversation and broad look into the most pressing global challenges of the Trump era. Then, four of the world's most prominent foreign policy voices zero in on the most important strategic relationship of the twenty-first century: the United States and China. Staged with our new "Unresolved" debate format, these debaters argue for or against a number of motions including: Is Donald Trump making China great again? Is China destined for regional dominance?  And can we strike a deal with Beijing to contain North Korea’s nuclear program? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How to Debate... Yourself.</title>
			<itunes:title>How to Debate... Yourself.</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 19:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>23:09</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/65e01248-841a-11e7-be36-d3c1204054e0/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">65e01248-841a-11e7-be36-d3c1204054e0</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5295d</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5295d</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zoGQ5Kc7TJWXIXLJI2EK9xnSb6Tt9ayxsw3KXsqfnd9P3koYdvYw2SiqEVjQTJ3Pa3Fim1JOskte9Syou+NNSMw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>One Nation Undecided: A Conversation with Peter Schuck</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Think about your most strongly held political belief. How did you arrive at your position?  What experiences, information, or opinions influenced you? </p><p>In the final installment of our summer podcast series on the state of political discourse today, we dive into an increasingly important skill: the ability to debate yourself.</p><p>Our host John Donvan sits down with Yale Law professor Peter Schuck to discuss his new book, <em>One Nation Undecided: Clear Thinking About Five Hard Issues That Divide Us</em>, which takes on five hot-button topics — poverty, immigration, campaign finance, affirmative action, and religion in public life — and shows us why there’s a legitimate case to be made for differing opinions.</p><p>After all, thinking about hard issues shouldn't be easy.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Think about your most strongly held political belief. How did you arrive at your position?  What experiences, information, or opinions influenced you? </p><p>In the final installment of our summer podcast series on the state of political discourse today, we dive into an increasingly important skill: the ability to debate yourself.</p><p>Our host John Donvan sits down with Yale Law professor Peter Schuck to discuss his new book, <em>One Nation Undecided: Clear Thinking About Five Hard Issues That Divide Us</em>, which takes on five hot-button topics — poverty, immigration, campaign finance, affirmative action, and religion in public life — and shows us why there’s a legitimate case to be made for differing opinions.</p><p>After all, thinking about hard issues shouldn't be easy.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A Summer Challenge: Radical Rethinking</title>
			<itunes:title>A Summer Challenge: Radical Rethinking</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>31:41</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/9368052e-578b-11e7-8c15-8fa91e822b93/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">9368052e-578b-11e7-8c15-8fa91e822b93</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5295e</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5295e</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z/WpC8QLQ5kmK0o9sfu8mJzzIDxLbN3iKbyxEuSASp0V5uNyk6dKA3SMMOpNtvZhsrdfx0/ZQWhxmzp/rNdxrug==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Are you willing to change your mind on abortion? What about immigration? Education?</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Here at Intelligence Squared U.S., we love a good argument – almost as much as we love an audience willing to change its mind. So when the <em>New York Times’</em> David Leonhardt challenged Americans to do just that this summer, we took notice.  In an <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/18/opinion/a-summer-project-to-nourish-your-political-soul.html">op-ed</a> entitled, “A Summer Project to Nourish Your Political Soul,” David asked readers to, "pick an issue that you find complicated, and grapple with it." But he didn’t stop there: David then advised readers to, “consider changing your mind, at least partially."</p><p>In this episode, David joins our host John Donvan to discuss the urgency of engaging with people and ideas that challenge closely held orthodoxies. He cites immigration, abortion, and education as examples of contemporary issues that defy easy answers, and says it’s ultimately the right and responsibility of every citizen in a democracy to wrestle with nuances and complexities. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Here at Intelligence Squared U.S., we love a good argument – almost as much as we love an audience willing to change its mind. So when the <em>New York Times’</em> David Leonhardt challenged Americans to do just that this summer, we took notice.  In an <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/18/opinion/a-summer-project-to-nourish-your-political-soul.html">op-ed</a> entitled, “A Summer Project to Nourish Your Political Soul,” David asked readers to, "pick an issue that you find complicated, and grapple with it." But he didn’t stop there: David then advised readers to, “consider changing your mind, at least partially."</p><p>In this episode, David joins our host John Donvan to discuss the urgency of engaging with people and ideas that challenge closely held orthodoxies. He cites immigration, abortion, and education as examples of contemporary issues that defy easy answers, and says it’s ultimately the right and responsibility of every citizen in a democracy to wrestle with nuances and complexities. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The State of Debate on Capitol Hill: The American Health Care Act</title>
			<itunes:title>The State of Debate on Capitol Hill: The American Health Care Act</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>28:10</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/93548dc8-578b-11e7-8c15-af8cdac02fb0/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">93548dc8-578b-11e7-8c15-af8cdac02fb0</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5295f</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5295f</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zK2zfAu3ujHh1VOeViRtGGghLtT1t/9sv4RAPNHdRqgBc44C4Bas2ZWF9qHmQ55FfY1Do7bhTKTrTDtwBi6qXfw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Former Congressman Mickey Edwards and Host John Donvan discuss the lost art of democratic debate in Congress.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Mickey Edwards, former member of Congress for 16 years, and vice president and program director at the Aspen Institute, recalls a more civil time in American politics, when both Democrats and Republicans were more likely to engage in debate on Capitol Hill. In this episode, he speaks with Intelligence Squared U.S. host John Donvan about the ways in which Congressional deliberation has changed over the past 40 years, and paths to restoring open discourse in Washington.</p><p>To support the show, visit http://smarturl.it/IQ2</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Mickey Edwards, former member of Congress for 16 years, and vice president and program director at the Aspen Institute, recalls a more civil time in American politics, when both Democrats and Republicans were more likely to engage in debate on Capitol Hill. In this episode, he speaks with Intelligence Squared U.S. host John Donvan about the ways in which Congressional deliberation has changed over the past 40 years, and paths to restoring open discourse in Washington.</p><p>To support the show, visit http://smarturl.it/IQ2</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#138 - Your Private Data: Can Tech Companies Keep it from the Law?</title>
			<itunes:title>#138 - Your Private Data: Can Tech Companies Keep it from the Law?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>56:40</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/29cffbe6-4ddf-11e6-9d42-d350d070c338/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">29cffbe6-4ddf-11e6-9d42-d350d070c338</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52960</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52960</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zaJdQbC1C8WeuYWomUQ4SfkSU/RSIIY2bl76chounxPgeILtC5vU54Nuw2OOO2mG+1Eb/olWySdGRe9QhkKSs/g==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Stewart Baker, Michael Chertoff, John Yoo, and Catherine Crump</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>138</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Tech Companies Should Be Required To Help Law Enforcement Execute Search Warrants To Access Customer Data</strong></p><p>Do you have a secret that no one else knows?  What about Apple, Google, Facebook, Verizon, or Uber?  Are you sure they don’t know your secret?  Digital data – emails, text messages, phone records, location records, web searches – contain traces of almost every secret.  They also contain traces of almost every crime.  Tech companies may promise to protect our data from prying eyes.  But should that promise yield to law enforcement and national security? </p><p>To support the show, visit http://smarturl.it/IQ2</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Tech Companies Should Be Required To Help Law Enforcement Execute Search Warrants To Access Customer Data</strong></p><p>Do you have a secret that no one else knows?  What about Apple, Google, Facebook, Verizon, or Uber?  Are you sure they don’t know your secret?  Digital data – emails, text messages, phone records, location records, web searches – contain traces of almost every secret.  They also contain traces of almost every crime.  Tech companies may promise to protect our data from prying eyes.  But should that promise yield to law enforcement and national security? </p><p>To support the show, visit http://smarturl.it/IQ2</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#137 - Will Video Games Make Us Smarter?</title>
			<itunes:title>#137 - Will Video Games Make Us Smarter?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/20f36f02-154f-11e7-a1c1-4fcb821d94de/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">20f36f02-154f-11e7-a1c1-4fcb821d94de</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52961</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52961</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zP1Bep/AyPJExOb1i6gCkOdxpRKuWXbHyhIQbP5a682fk8swlE0equY6ebQw1rWYq9+dXFy/4vXBy6sS6FYScyA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Daphne Bavelier, Elias Aboujaoude, Asi Burak, and Walter R. Boot</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>137</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Video Games Will Make Us Smarter.</strong>As video games gain prominence, some game creators are turning to global issues, such as poverty alleviation, international diplomacy, and combating climate change, for inspiration. Playing these socially minded games, they argue, allows users to build tangible skills in combating crisis and solving critical problems. But others see the multibillion-dollar gaming industry, dominated by portrayals of crime and war, as a threat that desensitizes its users to violence and encourages anti-social behavior. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Video Games Will Make Us Smarter.</strong>As video games gain prominence, some game creators are turning to global issues, such as poverty alleviation, international diplomacy, and combating climate change, for inspiration. Playing these socially minded games, they argue, allows users to build tangible skills in combating crisis and solving critical problems. But others see the multibillion-dollar gaming industry, dominated by portrayals of crime and war, as a threat that desensitizes its users to violence and encourages anti-social behavior. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[#136 - Unresolved: Trump's First 100 Days]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[#136 - Unresolved: Trump's First 100 Days]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>1:00:11</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/0f6b6888-2aa9-11e7-81c9-e3760fed249b/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">0f6b6888-2aa9-11e7-81c9-e3760fed249b</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52962</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52962</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z3FeMHBm/cfSyx+PsU0H0vqvafrWWqYIBqk6NBSJCUZWAYjf7XtHVA4RS8B83+zZbVXVFKADl/ipBVB3XfEXtRA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Jamelle Bouie, Ian Bremmer, Kris Kobach, Rich Lowry, and Jennifer Rubin</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>136</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The first 100 days of the Trump administration have been filled with a whirlwind of new policies and challenges to Washington orthodoxies, and the country is sharply divided.  But if we are open to it, we might find that there are reasonable arguments being made by both sides on many issues.  And those conversations can start by considering: President Trump’s “America First” policy, and what it means to different people; the administration’s impact on the health of the stock market and our economy; the team that the president has assembled; and whether it’s the media, or the president, that’s under attack. In one night we embark on a radical departure from our Oxford-style format, asking five debaters, from across the political spectrum, for their views on four key issues under the new Trump presidency.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The first 100 days of the Trump administration have been filled with a whirlwind of new policies and challenges to Washington orthodoxies, and the country is sharply divided.  But if we are open to it, we might find that there are reasonable arguments being made by both sides on many issues.  And those conversations can start by considering: President Trump’s “America First” policy, and what it means to different people; the administration’s impact on the health of the stock market and our economy; the team that the president has assembled; and whether it’s the media, or the president, that’s under attack. In one night we embark on a radical departure from our Oxford-style format, asking five debaters, from across the political spectrum, for their views on four key issues under the new Trump presidency.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#135 - Has Walmart Been Good For America?</title>
			<itunes:title>#135 - Has Walmart Been Good For America?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>56:06</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/29862868-4ddf-11e6-9d42-4f5dddb8c2be/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">29862868-4ddf-11e6-9d42-4f5dddb8c2be</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52963</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52963</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zNH3o+nDMhpqO9hTGfHLi83YN66uEc9ZjVnAm5kXaWxwtjFdqH/GH3M+o/30iqohS3/QOjPtpd72CGXpgrbyQBw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With John Tierney, Richard K. Vedder, Nelson Lichtenstein, Amy Traub</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>135</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Walmart has long been a target for critics of corporate expansion, but does the company really deserve the scrutiny?  Some say that the big-box retailer devastates small communities by pushing out locally-owned businesses, mistreats its workers through low pay and restrictive work hours, and forces American companies  to use cheap foreign labor to produce goods at low cost.  Others point to the fact that Walmart provides countless jobs to low-skilled American workers, sells affordable goods, has increasingly become a leader in sustainability, and attracts new consumers and businesses to its neighborhoods.  Has Walmart been good for America?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Walmart has long been a target for critics of corporate expansion, but does the company really deserve the scrutiny?  Some say that the big-box retailer devastates small communities by pushing out locally-owned businesses, mistreats its workers through low pay and restrictive work hours, and forces American companies  to use cheap foreign labor to produce goods at low cost.  Others point to the fact that Walmart provides countless jobs to low-skilled American workers, sells affordable goods, has increasingly become a leader in sustainability, and attracts new consumers and businesses to its neighborhoods.  Has Walmart been good for America?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#134 - Is Universal Basic Income the Safety Net of the Future?</title>
			<itunes:title>#134 - Is Universal Basic Income the Safety Net of the Future?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:56</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/296173d8-4ddf-11e6-9d42-430830c06e3d/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">296173d8-4ddf-11e6-9d42-430830c06e3d</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52964</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52964</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zghBeLNynZoREfpOyLPG6guPU2CH0odBhKK5ynU+odWNmoC+FHCFrYy3ZEjWFBqfNcbZRwyKwglUH1rqqQocUAg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Charles Murray, Andrew Stern, Jared Bernstein and Jason Furman</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>134</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Imagine getting a check from the government every month. $600 guaranteed. It's happening in Finland, where a pilot program is being launched to test what's known as a "universal basic income". As technology transforms the workplace, jobs and income will be less reliable. The idea is that a universal basic income could serve as a tool to combat poverty and uncertainly in a changing society, and provide a cushion that empowers workers, giving them latitude to take risks in the job market. But some argue a guaranteed income would take away the incentive to work, waste money on those who don't need it, and come at the expense of effective programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Is the universal income the safety net of the future?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Imagine getting a check from the government every month. $600 guaranteed. It's happening in Finland, where a pilot program is being launched to test what's known as a "universal basic income". As technology transforms the workplace, jobs and income will be less reliable. The idea is that a universal basic income could serve as a tool to combat poverty and uncertainly in a changing society, and provide a cushion that empowers workers, giving them latitude to take risks in the job market. But some argue a guaranteed income would take away the incentive to work, waste money on those who don't need it, and come at the expense of effective programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Is the universal income the safety net of the future?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#133 - Are Charter Schools Overrated?</title>
			<itunes:title>#133 - Are Charter Schools Overrated?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>57:09</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/293fc47c-4ddf-11e6-9d42-e349af196279/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">293fc47c-4ddf-11e6-9d42-e349af196279</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52965</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52965</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zp6MhzVR/6x5Ro1TGP7qmhBmZJblWWlT1OfYv+izPo/sLpwKXWATA54JXDnIh3rqYWd9ZhS/6V1Fv5GgDxC58sA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Gary Miron, Jeanne Allen, Julian Vasquez Heilig, and Gerard Robinson</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>133</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Charter Schools Are Overrated</p><p></strong>In the 25 years since Minnesota passed the first charter school law, these publicly funded but privately operated schools have become a highly sought-after alternative to traditional public education, particularly for underserved students in urban areas. Between 2004 and 2014 alone, charter school enrollment increased from less than 1 million to 2.5 million students. Many charter schools boast of high test scores, strict academic expectations, and high graduation rates, and for some, their growth is evidence of their success. But have these schools lived up to their promise? Opponents argue that charters, which are subject to fewer regulations and less oversight, lack accountability, take much-needed resources from public schools, and pick and choose their student body.  Are charter schools overrated? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Charter Schools Are Overrated</p><p></strong>In the 25 years since Minnesota passed the first charter school law, these publicly funded but privately operated schools have become a highly sought-after alternative to traditional public education, particularly for underserved students in urban areas. Between 2004 and 2014 alone, charter school enrollment increased from less than 1 million to 2.5 million students. Many charter schools boast of high test scores, strict academic expectations, and high graduation rates, and for some, their growth is evidence of their success. But have these schools lived up to their promise? Opponents argue that charters, which are subject to fewer regulations and less oversight, lack accountability, take much-needed resources from public schools, and pick and choose their student body.  Are charter schools overrated? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[#132 - Has the U.S.-Saudi "Special Relationship" Outlived its Usefulness?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[#132 - Has the U.S.-Saudi "Special Relationship" Outlived its Usefulness?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/296eee64-4ddf-11e6-9d42-23c4bb19b239/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">296eee64-4ddf-11e6-9d42-23c4bb19b239</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52966</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52966</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zLHKOlqGjZrD4ZFiaguVgQvE1Qr40C3hK+mm7u2T+E6Wz3GZpOKUd4KpPIxmv29xsgiaSJ+J3dOSmOfQ1ItGaEA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Madawi Al-Rasheed, F. Gregory Gause, Mark P. Lagon, and James Jeffrey</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>132</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: The Special U.S.-Saudi Relationship Has Outlived Its Usefulness</strong></p><p>In 1945, U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and King Abdul Aziz of Saudi Arabia met onboard the USS Quincy.  A close relationship between the two countries has been maintained ever since, with oil and military and intelligence cooperation at its foundation.  But the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. shale revolution, human rights concerns, and diverging interests in the Middle East, have all put strains on this relationship.  Has this special relationship outlived its usefulness, or is it too important to walk away from? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: The Special U.S.-Saudi Relationship Has Outlived Its Usefulness</strong></p><p>In 1945, U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and King Abdul Aziz of Saudi Arabia met onboard the USS Quincy.  A close relationship between the two countries has been maintained ever since, with oil and military and intelligence cooperation at its foundation.  But the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. shale revolution, human rights concerns, and diverging interests in the Middle East, have all put strains on this relationship.  Has this special relationship outlived its usefulness, or is it too important to walk away from? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#131 - Should We Give Trump a Chance?</title>
			<itunes:title>#131 - Should We Give Trump a Chance?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/2976071c-4ddf-11e6-9d42-3bcc6a7c5d26/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2976071c-4ddf-11e6-9d42-3bcc6a7c5d26</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52967</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52967</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zWaK20JoIv7xMBAf8JUHIDhs6e0lDFUQhMBKFm43GL/sF2Fqbd2UU66DE3HCUh6LitUvN/OSBAlXDvH3Qj3qEvw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Clive Crook, David Frum, Gayle Trotter, and Michael Waldman</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>131</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/3c9d3619b06e244cf1dac88d2eb4a5ba.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Give Trump a Chance</p><p></strong></p><p>Donald Trump assumes office having won the Electoral College, but having lost the popular vote. His opponents argue that he gave voice and legitimacy to extremists, and that his unpredictable, autocratic style is a threat to both democratic ideals at home. But others argue that Trump’s election represents the will of the American people, who--hungry for change--repudiated the status quo.  In their view, we must find areas of common ground to work together. Should we give President Trump a chance? <strong></p><p></strong></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Give Trump a Chance</p><p></strong></p><p>Donald Trump assumes office having won the Electoral College, but having lost the popular vote. His opponents argue that he gave voice and legitimacy to extremists, and that his unpredictable, autocratic style is a threat to both democratic ideals at home. But others argue that Trump’s election represents the will of the American people, who--hungry for change--repudiated the status quo.  In their view, we must find areas of common ground to work together. Should we give President Trump a chance? <strong></p><p></strong></p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#130 - Is Policing Racially Biased?</title>
			<itunes:title>#130 - Is Policing Racially Biased?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/292742a8-4ddf-11e6-9d42-7f4a2e36b89a/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">292742a8-4ddf-11e6-9d42-7f4a2e36b89a</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52968</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52968</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z523pIKYjgl+5j/YvzN5DIlEDM4xRnxNNzMhNOqqN2bP8Sw9k/1qxK4kAPdWWm9Mgv8iu5rtGjtS8hRQ5S7BRIg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Gloria Browne Marshall, Heather Mac Donald, Marq Claxton, and Harry Stern</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>130</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Policing Is Racially Biased</p><p></strong>In 2014, the shooting of Michael Brown by police officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, Missouri, set off a wave of protests and sparked a movement targeting racial disparities in criminal justice.  Since then, there have been other controversial deaths of African Americans at the hands of law enforcement that have captured the public’s attention, from Tamir Rice, to Philando Castile.  But there are some who say that these encounters, many of them recorded, have fed a narrative of biased policing that the data does not back up, vilifying people who are trying to do good in a difficult job that often puts them in harm’s way.  What are the statistics, and how should we interpret them?  How have recent incidents shaped our view of policing?  Does crime drive law enforcement’s use of force, or is there racial bias?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Policing Is Racially Biased</p><p></strong>In 2014, the shooting of Michael Brown by police officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, Missouri, set off a wave of protests and sparked a movement targeting racial disparities in criminal justice.  Since then, there have been other controversial deaths of African Americans at the hands of law enforcement that have captured the public’s attention, from Tamir Rice, to Philando Castile.  But there are some who say that these encounters, many of them recorded, have fed a narrative of biased policing that the data does not back up, vilifying people who are trying to do good in a difficult job that often puts them in harm’s way.  What are the statistics, and how should we interpret them?  How have recent incidents shaped our view of policing?  Does crime drive law enforcement’s use of force, or is there racial bias?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#129 - Should States Call a Convention to Amend the Constitution?</title>
			<itunes:title>#129 - Should States Call a Convention to Amend the Constitution?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/29034394-4ddf-11e6-9d42-bfad252ffe37/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">29034394-4ddf-11e6-9d42-bfad252ffe37</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52969</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52969</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zARzT7B+H6jIFOELlIJNoBZFC/JbPOZhkLmbDlvzgPGCQPw8LyY0fKIdXQTvSmxKNVpiUQ7LfCQ0hRIWRieUUrA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Lawrence Lessig, David Super, Mark Meckler, and Walter Olson</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>129</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion; Call a Convention to Amend the Constitution</p><p></strong>Almost everyone can think of something they would like to change in the U.S. Constitution. Some would like to update it to fit new technologies and evolving social mores. Others think the Supreme Court has illegitimately “updated” it too much already, and would like to restore its original meaning. Either way, it is always tempting to invoke Article V to amend the Constitution—to “fix" it, or “restore" it, or “improve" it... </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion; Call a Convention to Amend the Constitution</p><p></strong>Almost everyone can think of something they would like to change in the U.S. Constitution. Some would like to update it to fit new technologies and evolving social mores. Others think the Supreme Court has illegitimately “updated” it too much already, and would like to restore its original meaning. Either way, it is always tempting to invoke Article V to amend the Constitution—to “fix" it, or “restore" it, or “improve" it... </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[#128 - Is Obama's Foreign Policy a Failure?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[#128 - Is Obama's Foreign Policy a Failure?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/28fb9392-4ddf-11e6-9d42-8bbf3446cb9d/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">28fb9392-4ddf-11e6-9d42-8bbf3446cb9d</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5296a</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5296a</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zHX+oBPHfjM8xAtNDGhPvHuWeOyq0pABMAoeltiL1qNM9QGUWE+WlIZm0BLrAmX1xdk0ZdIO3Hu884V7jNl6Zuw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Eliot Cohen, Derek Chollet, Kristen Silverberg, and Vikram Singh</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>128</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Obama's Foreign Policy is a Failure</p><p></strong>For many, Obama’s presidency will be defined by its accomplishments. Taking out Osama bin Laden, disengaging from fights in the Middle East that America cannot win, defusing the threat of a nuclear Iran, and refocusing our attention and resources to Asia, where our greatest opportunities and biggest long-term challenges are located. But for others, it has been marked by missteps and retreat—pulling back where action and leadership was needed, and presiding over policies that strengthened our adversaries and disheartened our friends. Has Obama’s foreign policy been a success? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Obama's Foreign Policy is a Failure</p><p></strong>For many, Obama’s presidency will be defined by its accomplishments. Taking out Osama bin Laden, disengaging from fights in the Middle East that America cannot win, defusing the threat of a nuclear Iran, and refocusing our attention and resources to Asia, where our greatest opportunities and biggest long-term challenges are located. But for others, it has been marked by missteps and retreat—pulling back where action and leadership was needed, and presiding over policies that strengthened our adversaries and disheartened our friends. Has Obama’s foreign policy been a success? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#127 - Has Gerrymandering Destroyed the Political Center?</title>
			<itunes:title>#127 - Has Gerrymandering Destroyed the Political Center?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/28ea4c36-4ddf-11e6-9d42-6b8c08cb89ee/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">28ea4c36-4ddf-11e6-9d42-6b8c08cb89ee</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5296b</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5296b</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z/+amEIzzlDw6FqBq4qWBtDSPR51IbgiK0TkZi/pEp9JZ/H8ykevXl1E8vjZRGTqaaeo2hHcdD89cUlePKEGXuQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Caroline Fredrickson, Nolan McCarty, David Daley, and Chris Jankowski</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>127</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Gerrymandering is destroying the political center. </strong></p><p>It is alleged that the practice of gerrymandering—dividing election districts into units to favor a particular group—subverts democracy by making congressional districts “safe” for one party or the other. As a result, only those voting in primaries are in effect choosing our representatives. Are primary voters more extreme in their views, and therefore pulling democrats to the left and republicans to the right? Or is the impact of gerrymandering actually overblown, while other more divisive contributing factors like the emergence of ideologically charged TV and radio outlets, the role of the Internet and social network “echo chambers,” and campaign finance practices are in fact the real drivers of increasing partisanship? If gerrymandering is a major problem, is there policy or constitutional principles that might be part of the solution?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>MOTION: Gerrymandering is destroying the political center. </strong></p><p>It is alleged that the practice of gerrymandering—dividing election districts into units to favor a particular group—subverts democracy by making congressional districts “safe” for one party or the other. As a result, only those voting in primaries are in effect choosing our representatives. Are primary voters more extreme in their views, and therefore pulling democrats to the left and republicans to the right? Or is the impact of gerrymandering actually overblown, while other more divisive contributing factors like the emergence of ideologically charged TV and radio outlets, the role of the Internet and social network “echo chambers,” and campaign finance practices are in fact the real drivers of increasing partisanship? If gerrymandering is a major problem, is there policy or constitutional principles that might be part of the solution?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#126 - Should We Give Undocumented Immigrants a Path to Citizenship?</title>
			<itunes:title>#126 - Should We Give Undocumented Immigrants a Path to Citizenship?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:15</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/28d1f4ba-4ddf-11e6-9d42-db2634b0a3ed/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">28d1f4ba-4ddf-11e6-9d42-db2634b0a3ed</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5296c</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5296c</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z30qAjZM/1afRLiQ4gBxe3I9l+VQE7MbmfREGh/8GHhD0uUSei78i9QfCpl51N55VDFjRtsu7cFDYz69oZnYFpw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Angela Kelley, Steven Camarota, Marielena Hincapié, and Rich Lowry</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>126</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/a6fbf8554b59fd678dc458b02c96ef0c.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Give Undocumented Immigrants a Path to Citizenship</strong></p><p>There are an estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States, and the question of what to do with them has sparked years of fierce debate, but no significant action.  In 2013, the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” managed to pass a comprehensive immigration reform bill in the Senate, only to get it dropped by the House.  And in 2016, a deadlocked Supreme Court decision stalled President Obama’s executive actions, DACA and DAPA, which would have saved 5 million from deportation.  For voters, on this issue, the choice between presidential candidates could not be clearer.  Should we give these immigrants a chance to earn citizenship through a process that would include paying a penalty, passing a security check, and getting in the back of the line? Or are we rewarding them for breaking the rules, and encouraging more of the same?  Do they make positive contributions to the economy and complement our workforce, or do they burden taxpayers and create unwanted competition for jobs?  Should we give undocumented immigrants a path to citizenship?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Give Undocumented Immigrants a Path to Citizenship</strong></p><p>There are an estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States, and the question of what to do with them has sparked years of fierce debate, but no significant action.  In 2013, the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” managed to pass a comprehensive immigration reform bill in the Senate, only to get it dropped by the House.  And in 2016, a deadlocked Supreme Court decision stalled President Obama’s executive actions, DACA and DAPA, which would have saved 5 million from deportation.  For voters, on this issue, the choice between presidential candidates could not be clearer.  Should we give these immigrants a chance to earn citizenship through a process that would include paying a penalty, passing a security check, and getting in the back of the line? Or are we rewarding them for breaking the rules, and encouraging more of the same?  Do they make positive contributions to the economy and complement our workforce, or do they burden taxpayers and create unwanted competition for jobs?  Should we give undocumented immigrants a path to citizenship?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[#125 - Is "Big Pharma" to Blame for Rising Health Care Costs?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[#125 - Is "Big Pharma" to Blame for Rising Health Care Costs?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>58:10</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/28bfa404-4ddf-11e6-9d42-777f2b9ac83d/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">28bfa404-4ddf-11e6-9d42-777f2b9ac83d</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5296d</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5296d</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zaxgEZ4HOSopaxIDGATftsrbZ/sORx69Q6GrNjnb0RY7Qn39QeiaEFyNgvJOnrnANBXt0WskLXdLtSEXsECDCdw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Ezekiel Emanuel, Lori Reilly, Neera Tanden, and Paul Howard.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>125</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Blame Big Pharma for Out-of-Control Health Care Costs.</strong> Health care costs in the U.S. are some 18 percent of GNP, nearly double what other rich countries spend. We read of drug therapies that cost $100,000 a year or more, and of drug price increases that are 6 times the rate of inflation, on average, and often much more when mergers reduce competition in the industry. Is this a major driver of excessive health care costs? Or is it a by-product of the huge costs of getting new drugs approved? Has big pharma delivered drugs that reduce the need for costly surgeries, which extend life and improve its quality? Or do they deserve the blame that has been leveled against them?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Blame Big Pharma for Out-of-Control Health Care Costs.</strong> Health care costs in the U.S. are some 18 percent of GNP, nearly double what other rich countries spend. We read of drug therapies that cost $100,000 a year or more, and of drug price increases that are 6 times the rate of inflation, on average, and often much more when mergers reduce competition in the industry. Is this a major driver of excessive health care costs? Or is it a by-product of the huge costs of getting new drugs approved? Has big pharma delivered drugs that reduce the need for costly surgeries, which extend life and improve its quality? Or do they deserve the blame that has been leveled against them?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#124 - Are the Elites to Blame for the Trump Phenomenon?</title>
			<itunes:title>#124 - Are the Elites to Blame for the Trump Phenomenon?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:45</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/28a603fa-4ddf-11e6-9d42-bbb97226d7b6/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">28a603fa-4ddf-11e6-9d42-bbb97226d7b6</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5296e</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5296e</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zuVkcCRm9ahvnlMnUmv6j1Ueg1fPoHtYhD2u9DxCZF1d/D6FhwdeqUYffj3PhSTXIUJHHCYM17ugCq5mIgeItrA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Timothy Carney, Jennifer Rubin, Ben Domenech, and Bret Stephens</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>124</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Blame the Elites for the Trump Phenomenon.</strong> The elites of both parties have expressed contempt for Donald Trump, and Trump has succeeded in part by channeling his voters’ contempt for the elites. Does support for Trump reflect an uninformed populism and misplaced anger by a large swath of the American electorate? Or have the elites failed to empathize with their struggles, and failed to craft effective policies to help them cope?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motion: Blame the Elites for the Trump Phenomenon.</strong> The elites of both parties have expressed contempt for Donald Trump, and Trump has succeeded in part by channeling his voters’ contempt for the elites. Does support for Trump reflect an uninformed populism and misplaced anger by a large swath of the American electorate? Or have the elites failed to empathize with their struggles, and failed to craft effective policies to help them cope?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#123 - Climate Change: Has the EPA Gone Overboard?</title>
			<itunes:title>#123 - Climate Change: Has the EPA Gone Overboard?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:45</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/2ac0288c-4ddf-11e6-9d42-831acee8c264/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2ac0288c-4ddf-11e6-9d42-831acee8c264</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5296f</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5296f</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z0TdvWdD22ICJEa6v7nkJt8XqAcdf2MsXowL8114gdV3kdKHLGz6alV0ZkG1EsEkcygwFLE+lSH5r3EsYZ4HP6w==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Charles McConnell, Carl Pope, Michael Nasi, and Jody Freeman.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>123</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Reducing carbon emissions is clearly good for the environment but often imposes substantial costs. The costs are most obvious when coal companies go bankrupt, but can affect everyone indirectly through higher energy costs, slower economic growth, reduced employment, and lower business profits. Has the Environmental Protection Agency considered the costs and benefits of its regulatory mandates fairly and appropriately? Is its Clean Power Plan a bold initiative to reduce carbon pollution at power plants, or an unconstitutional usurpation of power?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Reducing carbon emissions is clearly good for the environment but often imposes substantial costs. The costs are most obvious when coal companies go bankrupt, but can affect everyone indirectly through higher energy costs, slower economic growth, reduced employment, and lower business profits. Has the Environmental Protection Agency considered the costs and benefits of its regulatory mandates fairly and appropriately? Is its Clean Power Plan a bold initiative to reduce carbon pollution at power plants, or an unconstitutional usurpation of power?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bonus Podcast: The GOP Must Seize The Center Or Die</title>
			<itunes:title>Bonus Podcast: The GOP Must Seize The Center Or Die</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>8:27</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8628bf94-48a9-11e6-a791-1b0b33035522/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8628bf94-48a9-11e6-a791-1b0b33035522</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52970</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52970</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z5fgLzPTRYV4GyiRiEHfJBuQUgKaY+uYIgeferLsOWeBvST4Q62oedRcC5laW3zDWkfyXvaby7dBQisa8Fiar0A==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With David Brooks, Laura Ingraham, Mickey Edwards, and Ralph Reed</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In April of 2013 we held a debate on the motion: The GOP Must Seize the Center or Die. At the time, the debaters could not have predicted Donald Trump’s candidacy or imagined the force of its impact on the 2016 election cycle. In this special podcast, we listen to excerpts of this 2013 debate and consider how times have changed.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>In April of 2013 we held a debate on the motion: The GOP Must Seize the Center or Die. At the time, the debaters could not have predicted Donald Trump’s candidacy or imagined the force of its impact on the 2016 election cycle. In this special podcast, we listen to excerpts of this 2013 debate and consider how times have changed.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bonus Podcast: The Supreme Court Considers Racial Preferences In State University Admissions</title>
			<itunes:title>Bonus Podcast: The Supreme Court Considers Racial Preferences In State University Admissions</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>48:59</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/c94dbfec-3a10-11e6-8cd0-c30fa4acc635/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c94dbfec-3a10-11e6-8cd0-c30fa4acc635</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52971</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52971</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zEs2Ztui6iKAjnD+rucDM3DeA8wDZliyDWpLdoS0op9hNHO0HxtQXbM85KQ99VaE1AmLq+aIJaUombifmsK6AXA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Roger Clegg, Deborah Archer, Stuart Taylor, Jr., and Erwin Chemerinsky</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>With the Supreme Court ruling on Fisher v. University of Texas being handed down on Thursday, June 23, 2016, We consider both sides of the issue of race-conscious university admissions. We listen back to our debate from December 2015: The Equal Protection Clause Forbids Racial Preferences in State University Admissions. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>With the Supreme Court ruling on Fisher v. University of Texas being handed down on Thursday, June 23, 2016, We consider both sides of the issue of race-conscious university admissions. We listen back to our debate from December 2015: The Equal Protection Clause Forbids Racial Preferences in State University Admissions. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#122 - Has The President Usurped The Constitutional Power Of Congress?</title>
			<itunes:title>#122 - Has The President Usurped The Constitutional Power Of Congress?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:26</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/357640a6-32b7-11e6-b4e9-dfd446dd2ea4/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">357640a6-32b7-11e6-b4e9-dfd446dd2ea4</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52972</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52972</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zIvpcdDN1fSL0hOBOad5KXKk0n9jxpWck+8qwi9bQ4tVrc5guZIMC/WkNGBZaguMw2cwjKYjrU7yNB8nmq8E5NA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Michael McConnell, Adam Cox, Carrie Severino, and Eric Posner.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>122</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Motion: The president has usurped the constitutional power of congress. The Supreme Court is currently poised to decide whether President Obama’s unilateral immigration actions usurped Congress’s power and flouted his duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” But some argue that the President is not exercising legislative power; he is simply exercising his well-established executive discretion. Has the President usurped Congress’s legislative power?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Motion: The president has usurped the constitutional power of congress. The Supreme Court is currently poised to decide whether President Obama’s unilateral immigration actions usurped Congress’s power and flouted his duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” But some argue that the President is not exercising legislative power; he is simply exercising his well-established executive discretion. Has the President usurped Congress’s legislative power?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#121 - Do Hunters Conserve Wildlife?</title>
			<itunes:title>#121 - Do Hunters Conserve Wildlife?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>57:53</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/aa583ea4-1c89-11e6-8247-0b631c62443f/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">aa583ea4-1c89-11e6-8247-0b631c62443f</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52973</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52973</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z+QrUkRtVUw37LW/HEcPNJ8P459mhgeCGil29kskzKHIJpbQ4fRKzfStyHnbAjAHSm0Ud9nbJgDPyY+O7bk+TKg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Anthony Licata, Catherine Semcer, Wayne Pacelle, and Adam Roberts</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>121</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Do Hunters Conserve Wildlife? In 2014, a permit to hunt a single endangered black rhino was sold for $350,000 as part of a program to support its conservation in Namibia. Counter intuitive? Through funds raised from legal hunting—the purchase of permits in Africa, licenses and taxes here in the U.S.—, hunters contribute significantly to wildlife conservation efforts. Hunting has also become an important tool in the effort to control animal populations, to the benefit of humans and wildlife alike. But are big-game revenues really benefiting conservation and local communities? And is hunting a humane way to maintain equilibrium and habitats, or are there better alternatives? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Do Hunters Conserve Wildlife? In 2014, a permit to hunt a single endangered black rhino was sold for $350,000 as part of a program to support its conservation in Namibia. Counter intuitive? Through funds raised from legal hunting—the purchase of permits in Africa, licenses and taxes here in the U.S.—, hunters contribute significantly to wildlife conservation efforts. Hunting has also become an important tool in the effort to control animal populations, to the benefit of humans and wildlife alike. But are big-game revenues really benefiting conservation and local communities? And is hunting a humane way to maintain equilibrium and habitats, or are there better alternatives? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#120 - Eliminate Corporate Subsidies</title>
			<itunes:title>#120 - Eliminate Corporate Subsidies</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>56:26</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/7bf2cdbd2e8fd2528757258f14469970/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7bf2cdbd2e8fd2528757258f14469970</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52974</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52974</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zIZJ3fBNhbR009nbaGCn9LdEo5+3qK3Yqy6wKSoOtqQvRppew1byYflGwXUImAfmcwwRlZ1DB7WT/9tqRtaR2yw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Jack Abramoff, Kate Gordon, Zephyr Teachout, and Michael Lind.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>120</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The auto industry, agriculture, the energy sector. What do they have in common? These industries benefit from government subsidies in the form of loans, tax breaks, regulation, and other preferences. Critics from the left and right say that not only do these subsidies transfer wealth from taxpayers to corporations, they distort the markets and our economy. Proponents say that government has an important role to play in launching innovation via strategic investment, and its support helps American companies thrive. Do we need subsidies, or is this corporate welfare?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The auto industry, agriculture, the energy sector. What do they have in common? These industries benefit from government subsidies in the form of loans, tax breaks, regulation, and other preferences. Critics from the left and right say that not only do these subsidies transfer wealth from taxpayers to corporations, they distort the markets and our economy. Proponents say that government has an important role to play in launching innovation via strategic investment, and its support helps American companies thrive. Do we need subsidies, or is this corporate welfare?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#119 - Should We Trust The Promise Of Artificial Intelligence?</title>
			<itunes:title>#119 - Should We Trust The Promise Of Artificial Intelligence?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e812c5477e20f86147d0d87725d4b220/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e812c5477e20f86147d0d87725d4b220</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52975</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52975</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zdHMHn3q8CrJsUsje2kWTPP9XhLWi8tuygjeOTilSHWST+1gq1cB3qwF7DWbW6ld9IHIeVumaL/jJMHVxyRn/3Q==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Andrew Keen, Jaron Lanier, James Hughes and Martine Rothblatt</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>119</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e6d55f63aa340ae0c2f672f0f5044407.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As technology rapidly progresses, some proponents of artificial intelligence believe that it will help solve complex social challenges and offer immortality via virtual humans. But AI’s critics say that we should proceed with caution. That its rewards may be overpromised, and that the pursuit of superintelligence and autonomous machines may result in unintended consequences. Is this the stuff of science fiction? Should we fear AI, or will these fears prevent the next technological revolution?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>As technology rapidly progresses, some proponents of artificial intelligence believe that it will help solve complex social challenges and offer immortality via virtual humans. But AI’s critics say that we should proceed with caution. That its rewards may be overpromised, and that the pursuit of superintelligence and autonomous machines may result in unintended consequences. Is this the stuff of science fiction? Should we fear AI, or will these fears prevent the next technological revolution?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#118 - Is Free Speech Threatened On Campus?</title>
			<itunes:title>#118 - Is Free Speech Threatened On Campus?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/1cd3474c43d567f922eb4d766bbadc3e/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1cd3474c43d567f922eb4d766bbadc3e</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52976</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52976</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zSC8/bxLxfOryfJMWc8L372p1kxtHWa+GhCQ9TB+151N9KvuUbDdM9RzXmaZ8fhCH2uMgGrozG2g6O0xWTk+ctQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Wendy Kaminer, Shaun Harper, John McWhorter, and Jason Stanley</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>118</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Protests have erupted on university campuses across the country. To many, these students are speaking out against racial injustice that has long been manifested in unwelcoming, sometimes hostile environments. But to critics, their demands have gone too far, creating an atmosphere of intolerance for opposing or unpopular points of view. Are the protesters silencing free speech, or are they just trying to be heard? And are the universities responding by defending free speech, or by suppressing it?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Protests have erupted on university campuses across the country. To many, these students are speaking out against racial injustice that has long been manifested in unwelcoming, sometimes hostile environments. But to critics, their demands have gone too far, creating an atmosphere of intolerance for opposing or unpopular points of view. Are the protesters silencing free speech, or are they just trying to be heard? And are the universities responding by defending free speech, or by suppressing it?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#117 - Are Lifespans Long Enough?</title>
			<itunes:title>#117 - Are Lifespans Long Enough?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:44</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/023b6c3bb9e4c21bf1fd3a05e4f85b0f/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">023b6c3bb9e4c21bf1fd3a05e4f85b0f</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52977</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52977</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z61B8Ix19DSjSRDVKBmf9i5R1SFNfobiEjy9kWC0DDRt5i+GcprlTdG/UTe+NxZpHDRYFOqzHfiiALh+dIVhLpQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Ian Ground, Aubrey de Grey, Paul Root Wolpe, and Brian Kennedy</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>117</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>What if we didn’t have to grow old and die? The average American can expect to live for 78.8 years, an improvement over the days before clean water and vaccines, but it's still not long enough for most of us. So researchers around the world have been working on arresting the process of aging through biotechnology. What are the ethical and social consequences of radically increasing lifespans? Should we accept a “natural” end, or should we find a cure to aging?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>What if we didn’t have to grow old and die? The average American can expect to live for 78.8 years, an improvement over the days before clean water and vaccines, but it's still not long enough for most of us. So researchers around the world have been working on arresting the process of aging through biotechnology. What are the ethical and social consequences of radically increasing lifespans? Should we accept a “natural” end, or should we find a cure to aging?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#116 - Should The U.S. Let In 100,000 Syrian Refugees?</title>
			<itunes:title>#116 - Should The U.S. Let In 100,000 Syrian Refugees?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/4a1e485601dd5c07517cc00d99c45ac6/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">4a1e485601dd5c07517cc00d99c45ac6</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52978</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52978</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zN3ThlDfkjJFkpiUigA7CJwX4R6hfhAEZBbNUf9ZsuHzPyBC62DpfUUoKWNTk52MZbKTu++ElCb3DxxTP+xsmbw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Robert Ford, David Frum, David Miliband, and Jessica Vaughan</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>116</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the Syrian Civil War began in 2011, more than 4 million Syrians have fled the country, creating the greatest refugee crisis since World War II. The United States has taken in just over 2,000 Syrian refugees since the war’s start, and the Obama administration has pledged to take another 10,000 in 2016. What are our moral obligations, and what are the cultural, economic, and security issues that must be taken into account? Should the U.S. let in 100,000 Syrian refugees?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Since the Syrian Civil War began in 2011, more than 4 million Syrians have fled the country, creating the greatest refugee crisis since World War II. The United States has taken in just over 2,000 Syrian refugees since the war’s start, and the Obama administration has pledged to take another 10,000 in 2016. What are our moral obligations, and what are the cultural, economic, and security issues that must be taken into account? Should the U.S. let in 100,000 Syrian refugees?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#115 - Does The Equal Protection Clause Forbid Racial Preferences In State University Admissions?</title>
			<itunes:title>#115 - Does The Equal Protection Clause Forbid Racial Preferences In State University Admissions?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>54:26</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/c34910775adc5239072fb1a1bac06dfb/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c34910775adc5239072fb1a1bac06dfb</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52979</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52979</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zwV6cMNZVvbsJM2PQAsjOGWVrwFjtrYNp0KaQlhiAHl9w5rm9GRRjefTDdRZ5uVrS408vDV5/SbLnqwv4+ui9Iw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Roger Clegg, Deborah Archer, Erwin Chemerinsky, and Stuart Taylor, Jr.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>115</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that: "No State shall … deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Yet many state universities give substantial preferences to certain races in their admissions decisions. In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court approved such preferences, but the case was close, and controversial, and the question will be back before the Supreme Court this term. One side may argue that these preferences level the playing field, remedy prior discrimination, and enhance diversity within the classroom, thus redeeming the true promise of equal protection. But the other may say that these preferences – in favor of some races, at the expense of others – are racial discrimination pure and simple, the precise evil that the Equal Protection Clause was intended to forbid.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that: "No State shall … deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Yet many state universities give substantial preferences to certain races in their admissions decisions. In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court approved such preferences, but the case was close, and controversial, and the question will be back before the Supreme Court this term. One side may argue that these preferences level the playing field, remedy prior discrimination, and enhance diversity within the classroom, thus redeeming the true promise of equal protection. But the other may say that these preferences – in favor of some races, at the expense of others – are racial discrimination pure and simple, the precise evil that the Equal Protection Clause was intended to forbid.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#114 - Can Central Banks Print Prosperity?</title>
			<itunes:title>#114 - Can Central Banks Print Prosperity?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>55:34</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/a10ded86fc146ebbf75a5c9ea75fea80/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">a10ded86fc146ebbf75a5c9ea75fea80</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5297a</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5297a</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z7wFm8Tv+utzg16wkbi7z9UmU2ki+hl2WGkyKF0vAcduMa4YFjF5JLHV6rxyRifclyFV1DooZBNNavCJHW5WwQA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Roger Bootle, Edward Conard, Simon Johnson, and Andrew Huszar</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>114</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Central banks all around the world have been printing money. This policy, known as quantitative easing in banker jargon, has driven up the price of stocks and bonds. But will it lead to real and sustainable increases in global growth, or is it sowing the seeds of future inflation?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Central banks all around the world have been printing money. This policy, known as quantitative easing in banker jargon, has driven up the price of stocks and bonds. But will it lead to real and sustainable increases in global growth, or is it sowing the seeds of future inflation?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#113 - Do U.S. Prosecutors Have Too Much Power?</title>
			<itunes:title>#113 - Do U.S. Prosecutors Have Too Much Power?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/9d8aeacc96cad6aa76f645c05ae45628/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">9d8aeacc96cad6aa76f645c05ae45628</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5297b</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5297b</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zwOr71RC9WMcqDPMOdYOWBtybWY3Dd+B3r6DQYPGbKZTaBYZxlCZh5vT+JKOfiTgTR6h9NvZLtPOxlpF73Jhtjg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Paul Butler, David Hoffman, Nancy Gertner, and Reid Schar</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>113</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Autonomy and secrecy, complex criminal code and mandatory minimums -- in combination, these factors have given prosecutors enormous leverage, and the opportunity to wield it relentlessly and selectively. Do prosecutors have too much power? Would changes reducing the leverage of prosecutors in the criminal justice system weaken their critical responsibility to prosecute crimes and secure equal justice for all?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Autonomy and secrecy, complex criminal code and mandatory minimums -- in combination, these factors have given prosecutors enormous leverage, and the opportunity to wield it relentlessly and selectively. Do prosecutors have too much power? Would changes reducing the leverage of prosecutors in the criminal justice system weaken their critical responsibility to prosecute crimes and secure equal justice for all?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#112 - Should College Students Be Allowed To Take Smart Drugs?</title>
			<itunes:title>#112 - Should College Students Be Allowed To Take Smart Drugs?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/61e7aa87f3e65eb2c3806f0c6d4b0064/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">61e7aa87f3e65eb2c3806f0c6d4b0064</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5297c</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5297c</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z7WzU7gRZCiwH2zfmgfKYgteWsTL3kDsF836juqixzBBLpVS+zRb6KN3WDwVUm00wTzhGjJuNDOdodhHo4aqVkA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Dr. Anjan Chatterjee, Eric Racine, Nita Farahany, and Nicole Vincent</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>112</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If you could take a pill that would help you study and get better grades, would you? Off-label use of “smart drugs” – pharmaceuticals meant to treat disorders like ADHD, narcolepsy, and Alzheimer’s – are becoming increasingly popular among college students hoping to get ahead. But is this cheating? Should their use as cognitive enhancers be approved by the FDA, the medical community, and society at large? Do the benefits outweigh the risks?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>If you could take a pill that would help you study and get better grades, would you? Off-label use of “smart drugs” – pharmaceuticals meant to treat disorders like ADHD, narcolepsy, and Alzheimer’s – are becoming increasingly popular among college students hoping to get ahead. But is this cheating? Should their use as cognitive enhancers be approved by the FDA, the medical community, and society at large? Do the benefits outweigh the risks?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#111 - Should We Raise The Federal Gas Tax To Fund Infrastructure?</title>
			<itunes:title>#111 - Should We Raise The Federal Gas Tax To Fund Infrastructure?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/468a5a42fd0bcdc019e7dcbd5da30b2b/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">468a5a42fd0bcdc019e7dcbd5da30b2b</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5297d</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5297d</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zrRIMusa73vZSlbT15tjHFe6LnmhL1PY2X31I4R4oO+d5X1gIM6ukVJa5nwiqDXZtUrlG5bf4yxd0eM0LEIHgLA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Shailen Bhatt, Adrian Moore, Alison Premo Black, and Stephen Moore</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>111</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The Highway Trust Fund provides funding for road, bridge, and mass transit projects across the country – and it’s running out of money. Its revenue source, the federal gas tax, has not been raised in over two decades. There are many arguments for a leaner fund, but proponents of the tax say that it still plays a vital role in supporting infrastructure. Should Congress raise the federal gas tax?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The Highway Trust Fund provides funding for road, bridge, and mass transit projects across the country – and it’s running out of money. Its revenue source, the federal gas tax, has not been raised in over two decades. There are many arguments for a leaner fund, but proponents of the tax say that it still plays a vital role in supporting infrastructure. Should Congress raise the federal gas tax?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bonus Podcast: Is Death Final?</title>
			<itunes:title>Bonus Podcast: Is Death Final?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>48:14</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/be165ac709489b7708fcb7eaf7e0bfd3/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">be165ac709489b7708fcb7eaf7e0bfd3</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5297e</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5297e</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9ztH1vnLIIpE47iXX7mi1RpQzYNWIXSmrwSm+G/nCf/kaaDIhmayLUud2qtNYd8E3MOHTJuDhQSZDm2DsXDQhKTg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Dr. Eben Alexander, Sean Carroll, Dr. Raymond Moody, and Dr. Steven Novella</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If consciousness is just the workings of neurons and synapses, how do we explain the phenomenon of near-death experience? By some accounts, about 3% of the U.S. population has had one: an out-of-body experience often characterized by remarkable visions and feelings of peace and joy, all while the physical body is close to death. To skeptics, there are more plausible, natural explanations, like oxygen deprivation. Is the prospect of an existence after death “real” and provable by science, or a construct of wishful thinking about our own mortality?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>If consciousness is just the workings of neurons and synapses, how do we explain the phenomenon of near-death experience? By some accounts, about 3% of the U.S. population has had one: an out-of-body experience often characterized by remarkable visions and feelings of peace and joy, all while the physical body is close to death. To skeptics, there are more plausible, natural explanations, like oxygen deprivation. Is the prospect of an existence after death “real” and provable by science, or a construct of wishful thinking about our own mortality?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#110 - Are China And The U.S. Long-Term Enemies?</title>
			<itunes:title>#110 - Are China And The U.S. Long-Term Enemies?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>57:54</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/5b3c2966d9b7ba105b37bedc87d5efe0/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5b3c2966d9b7ba105b37bedc87d5efe0</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5297f</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5297f</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zIC9f9CAjlyu0oUZ94JQrzcPZUEk0mgUXXHt5cN+fgNJAV4C6ou7Z224LSJIX9scJCl7tF8/FRbO3qByXGHOFIw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Peter Brookes, Robert Daly, John Mearsheimer, and Kevin Rudd</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>110</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Is China’s ascendancy a threat to the U.S.? China’s rise as an economic and military power, coupled with its aggression in the South China Sea, have led some to call for a major re-balancing of U.S. policy and strategy. Can China be trusted to act as a responsible global stakeholder? And will they be a long-term ally, or adversary?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Is China’s ascendancy a threat to the U.S.? China’s rise as an economic and military power, coupled with its aggression in the South China Sea, have led some to call for a major re-balancing of U.S. policy and strategy. Can China be trusted to act as a responsible global stakeholder? And will they be a long-term ally, or adversary?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#109 - Should Courts Or Campuses Decide Sexual Assault Cases?</title>
			<itunes:title>#109 - Should Courts Or Campuses Decide Sexual Assault Cases?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>54:58</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/6ffd6da6ed8986bf38f6bf87dd3df141/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6ffd6da6ed8986bf38f6bf87dd3df141</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52980</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52980</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zHQiSVMmE8if96x4+wWkkfv1U9mXY4tnqDPimSbEq7rBEki2vpp8S/2y/9+X83bl6nuF7qPxVJRdDT4PnF7thCQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Jed Rubenfeld, Michelle Anderson, Stephen Schulhofer, and Jeannie Suk</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>109</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>High-profile cases have recently put campus sexual assault in the spotlight. One question that has repeatedly come up: why are these cases being handled by campuses at all? Campus investigations may serve a real need, forcing schools to respond to violence and protecting the interests of victims in ways that the criminal justice system may fail. Can schools provide due process for defendants and adequate justice for victims?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>High-profile cases have recently put campus sexual assault in the spotlight. One question that has repeatedly come up: why are these cases being handled by campuses at all? Campus investigations may serve a real need, forcing schools to respond to violence and protecting the interests of victims in ways that the criminal justice system may fail. Can schools provide due process for defendants and adequate justice for victims?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bonus Podcast: Should We Abolish the Minimum Wage?</title>
			<itunes:title>Bonus Podcast: Should We Abolish the Minimum Wage?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>50:04</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e673a88f8776c46d25ab046d44d9c971/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e673a88f8776c46d25ab046d44d9c971</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52981</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52981</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zVAmMBJpLYAwzAz1pzr+G75RuziaqAj+MIOFv+F8KL6MJYMhXcBG4658NnNwrSf9blhuEWad3uuQmmU51yOscew==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With James A. Dorn, Jared Bernstein, Russell Roberts, and Karen Kornbluh</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a special podcast for Labor Day. The first attempt at establishing a national minimum wage, a part of 1933’s sweeping National Industrial Recovery Act, was struck down by the Supreme Court in 1935. But in 1938, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed into law a minimum hourly wage of 25 cents—$4.07 in today’s dollars. Three-quarters of a century later, we are still debating the merits of this cornerstone of the New Deal. Do we need government to ensure a decent paycheck, or would low-wage workers and the economy be better off without its intervention?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>This is a special podcast for Labor Day. The first attempt at establishing a national minimum wage, a part of 1933’s sweeping National Industrial Recovery Act, was struck down by the Supreme Court in 1935. But in 1938, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed into law a minimum hourly wage of 25 cents—$4.07 in today’s dollars. Three-quarters of a century later, we are still debating the merits of this cornerstone of the New Deal. Do we need government to ensure a decent paycheck, or would low-wage workers and the economy be better off without its intervention?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#108 - Does The U.S. Need To Defeat ISIS, Or Is Containment Enough?</title>
			<itunes:title>#108 - Does The U.S. Need To Defeat ISIS, Or Is Containment Enough?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:34</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/0e2dc7e8c193ea3733d0846a83e8344d/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">0e2dc7e8c193ea3733d0846a83e8344d</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52982</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52982</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zp6GUJD0MVTAtgcdJ54Sq7b31HG6ddhrv5Dz+G8dAPfyUeSG5QtGNrzk8RQqvP8jRJXH/zH6U0V9X+rB1uqNyng==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Michèle Flournoy, Anne-Marie Slaughter, Philip Zelikow, and Dov Zakheim</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The region under the control of ISIS continues to expand, despite airstrikes and the deployment of U.S. military advisers. Should the U.S. goal be containment, or can ISIS be defeated?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The region under the control of ISIS continues to expand, despite airstrikes and the deployment of U.S. military advisers. Should the U.S. goal be containment, or can ISIS be defeated?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bonus Podcast: Israel Can Live With A Nuclear Iran</title>
			<itunes:title>Bonus Podcast: Israel Can Live With A Nuclear Iran</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:19</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/a3358c953dea295801ba21084e819df7/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">a3358c953dea295801ba21084e819df7</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52983</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52983</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z8KwA8nDtgxY4cPbzA48GIJDMju13lZKLMSZEJoYcFV6LTdkoak/GpUptN6uQzAuLynKHgG/DFpRjO7HqpKAt2g==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>James Dobbins, Reuven Pedatzur, Shmuel Bar, Jeffery Goldberg</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S., Iran, and other world powers have reached a final deal to limit Iran's ability to build a nuclear weapon.  According to President Obama, "every pathway to a nuclear weapon is cut off." But to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, this deal will go down as "a historic mistake". In 2013, Intelligence Squared U.S. debated whether "Israel can live with a nuclear Iran." Would a nuclear Iran pose an existential threat to Israel? What role does it play in Israel's condemnation of this historic pact?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The U.S., Iran, and other world powers have reached a final deal to limit Iran's ability to build a nuclear weapon.  According to President Obama, "every pathway to a nuclear weapon is cut off." But to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, this deal will go down as "a historic mistake". In 2013, Intelligence Squared U.S. debated whether "Israel can live with a nuclear Iran." Would a nuclear Iran pose an existential threat to Israel? What role does it play in Israel's condemnation of this historic pact?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bonus Podcast: Obamacare Is Now Beyond Rescue</title>
			<itunes:title>Bonus Podcast: Obamacare Is Now Beyond Rescue</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>49:07</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/7ef553505c7c9623d87394c7ad7298c3/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7ef553505c7c9623d87394c7ad7298c3</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52984</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52984</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zI2VyaM4q4sSubjSQB4WUMusMlBs6YQ8LhncDGpS4v8juP6dKorZZ3HT5ijR2Ic1Csg0ErxdhJs/fu2mLRR1FaA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Dr. Scott Gottlieb, Megan McArdle, Jonathan Chait, Dr. Douglas Kamerow</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>With the recent Supreme Court ruling that upholds the Affordable Health Care Act, President Obama seems to have secured the legislative cornerstone of his Presidential legacy. But is Obamacare now finally on the road to permanence or is the recent Supreme Court ruling just a setback for a still steady opposition to repeal the law? We'd like to take a moment to look back at a debate we held in January, 2014 just four years after Obamacare was signed into law in 2010. The motion being debated that night was: OBAMACARE IS NOW BEYOND RESCUE.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>With the recent Supreme Court ruling that upholds the Affordable Health Care Act, President Obama seems to have secured the legislative cornerstone of his Presidential legacy. But is Obamacare now finally on the road to permanence or is the recent Supreme Court ruling just a setback for a still steady opposition to repeal the law? We'd like to take a moment to look back at a debate we held in January, 2014 just four years after Obamacare was signed into law in 2010. The motion being debated that night was: OBAMACARE IS NOW BEYOND RESCUE.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bonus Podcast: Men Are Finished</title>
			<itunes:title>Bonus Podcast: Men Are Finished</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:25</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/982be1757128c43b40a31e85cd712df0/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">982be1757128c43b40a31e85cd712df0</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52985</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52985</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zR5hyCv20n7kD4boQFB5Xu4H5rfd9fU2bwle/5hmtI+t+zwMT4xGG+lCqIDQAc+k59GAwKPlmTM2uC4yzOyyyDA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Hannah Rosin, Dan Abrams, Christina Hoff Sommers, David ZIncZenko</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>More women than men are enrolling and graduating from college and their participation in the labor force has grown. So on this Father's Day, alongside the many deserving gestures of love and appreciation, we'd like to take a moment to reflect on what could lie ahead for dear old Dad. The central question arising, are we now at a place where women will achieve in the futurethe same sort of dominane that men have held in the past, or will it always be a man's world?</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>More women than men are enrolling and graduating from college and their participation in the labor force has grown. So on this Father's Day, alongside the many deserving gestures of love and appreciation, we'd like to take a moment to reflect on what could lie ahead for dear old Dad. The central question arising, are we now at a place where women will achieve in the futurethe same sort of dominane that men have held in the past, or will it always be a man's world?</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#107 - Should States Be Required To License Same-Sex Marriages?</title>
			<itunes:title>#107 - Should States Be Required To License Same-Sex Marriages?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:23</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/99a5f4b91f45e29e554d9f439b9ecacf/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">99a5f4b91f45e29e554d9f439b9ecacf</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52986</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52986</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zCF6Qn9lyBlnjhG0UCMuX/zOixcJYJPfObdLCecaRcd4ppUCK/Hesls3AwR7vHOvnxKsXs5rOk5joBgg9ELNx4w==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With John Eastman, Evan Wolfson, Sherif Girgis, and Kenji Yoshino</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>107</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides: “No State shall … deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” And now, the Supreme Court is poised to answer the question of whether this clause requires States to license marriages between two people of the same sex. Does the Equal Protection Clause require States to license same-sex marriages, or will marriage be defined as between a man and a woman?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides: “No State shall … deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” And now, the Supreme Court is poised to answer the question of whether this clause requires States to license marriages between two people of the same sex. Does the Equal Protection Clause require States to license same-sex marriages, or will marriage be defined as between a man and a woman?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[#106 - Is Obama's Iran Deal Good For America?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[#106 - Is Obama's Iran Deal Good For America?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:21</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/0648daefb7831c636f45e4cf60939572/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">0648daefb7831c636f45e4cf60939572</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52987</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52987</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zVxvBxjQhq/IRPM8Jxu7JbJk4+ni/t9+hFzvnAwxQUu+RBv+NkC6J0U9BKnoC4tfccWuaRZYJpzvdjwcfgyaC6g==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Philip Gordon, Michael Doran, Thomas Pickering, and Mark Dubowitz.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In April 2015, the P5+1, the 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany, negotiated an interim nuclear accord with Iran. Among the key parameters: Iran’s enrichment capacity, enrichment levels, and stockpile would be limited; its Fordow site converted into a research center; and the Arak heavy water reactor redesigned. In return, the IAEA would gain greater access for inspections, and U.S. and EU sanctions would be lifted. Many in the U.S. fear that a deal as outlined would not go far enough and, instead of being a benefit, would strengthen Iran’s hand in the Middle East. Not to mention the important question of trust. Is this agreement a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity” to halt nuclear proliferation, or does President Obama have this wrong?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>In April 2015, the P5+1, the 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany, negotiated an interim nuclear accord with Iran. Among the key parameters: Iran’s enrichment capacity, enrichment levels, and stockpile would be limited; its Fordow site converted into a research center; and the Arak heavy water reactor redesigned. In return, the IAEA would gain greater access for inspections, and U.S. and EU sanctions would be lifted. Many in the U.S. fear that a deal as outlined would not go far enough and, instead of being a benefit, would strengthen Iran’s hand in the Middle East. Not to mention the important question of trust. Is this agreement a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity” to halt nuclear proliferation, or does President Obama have this wrong?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bonus Podcast: Too Many Kids Go To College</title>
			<itunes:title>Bonus Podcast: Too Many Kids Go To College</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>50:54</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/414f24a2c134b7e0c47be31c5a2667ae/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">414f24a2c134b7e0c47be31c5a2667ae</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52988</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52988</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zBeK0zsyFhQQOWl21ww94JxV89v7IpRepnk21OLy4zJOYBvF6kuUZcUilgBheIPRyyP4TQ6RXxYCER6fOyvkoVQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Peter Thiel, Charles Murray, Henry Bienen and Vivek Wadhwa</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It's graduation season, a time for high school seniors to look backand celebrate their formative years before embarking on the next stepon their academic journey: college. But not every graduating senior attends college and perhapsnot every student should. With enemployment for those with bachelor's degrees still at an all-time high and student loan debt surpassing credit card debt, it begs the question whether its really worth it? And calls to mind a debate we had on October 12th, 2011 where the motion being debated was: Too Many Kids Go To College</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>It's graduation season, a time for high school seniors to look backand celebrate their formative years before embarking on the next stepon their academic journey: college. But not every graduating senior attends college and perhapsnot every student should. With enemployment for those with bachelor's degrees still at an all-time high and student loan debt surpassing credit card debt, it begs the question whether its really worth it? And calls to mind a debate we had on October 12th, 2011 where the motion being debated was: Too Many Kids Go To College</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#105 - Is Smart Technology Making Us Dumb?</title>
			<itunes:title>#105 - Is Smart Technology Making Us Dumb?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:02</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/47eabb81de83adf93acb07909efc11cf/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">47eabb81de83adf93acb07909efc11cf</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52989</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52989</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z+0/ohCQUXqVh1ws/isu0cEvs5Br6L5izPwNNQ8QpzXNwFympnvkw3ji8QQh/r7T5a7RLG3yivwqoMdJPVl8rwA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Nicholas Carr, Genevieve Bell, Andrew Keen, and David Weinberger.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Smart technology grants us unprecedented, immediate access to knowledge and to each other -- a ubiquitous and seamless presence in everyday life. But is there a downside to all of this connectivity? It’s been said that smart technology creates dependency on devices, narrows our world to echo chambers, and impairs cognitive skills through shortcuts and distraction. Are these concerns an overstatement of the negative effects of high-tech consumption?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Smart technology grants us unprecedented, immediate access to knowledge and to each other -- a ubiquitous and seamless presence in everyday life. But is there a downside to all of this connectivity? It’s been said that smart technology creates dependency on devices, narrows our world to echo chambers, and impairs cognitive skills through shortcuts and distraction. Are these concerns an overstatement of the negative effects of high-tech consumption?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#104 - Should We Abolish the Death Penalty?</title>
			<itunes:title>#104 - Should We Abolish the Death Penalty?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:42</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/69581f4df3be44cab6e06c269b8be984/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">69581f4df3be44cab6e06c269b8be984</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5298a</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5298a</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zZUBXbtyielq7F2oyjr9BmM/BlfULovOedLrkthB9NuvuAsZn06meYK6+TmSBQYMo0Tzoy08oS+GU+kdkmQERrg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Diann Rust-Tierney, Robert Blecker, Barry Scheck, and Kent Scheidegger.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>105</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/eb4ed054fe046805096bdb0e504680c5.png"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent Gallup poll found that Americans are still largely supportive of the death penalty, with 6 in 10 in favor as punishment for murder. At the heart of the debate are many complicated questions. Within a flawed criminal justice system, is it possible to know every person’s guilt with a sufficient degree of certainty? Does the fear of death reduce crime? Are there race and class biases in sentencing? Are some crimes so heinous in nature that punishment by death is the only appropriate measure, or is capital punishment always immoral?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>A recent Gallup poll found that Americans are still largely supportive of the death penalty, with 6 in 10 in favor as punishment for murder. At the heart of the debate are many complicated questions. Within a flawed criminal justice system, is it possible to know every person’s guilt with a sufficient degree of certainty? Does the fear of death reduce crime? Are there race and class biases in sentencing? Are some crimes so heinous in nature that punishment by death is the only appropriate measure, or is capital punishment always immoral?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#103 - Has The President Exceeded His Authority By Waging War Without Congress?</title>
			<itunes:title>#103 - Has The President Exceeded His Authority By Waging War Without Congress?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/f884e0fb113326f5e5d11c48d0299517/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">f884e0fb113326f5e5d11c48d0299517</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5298b</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5298b</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zPH84PiJT9CEapBOL3LbE3rJhtDfCARJMkyuXVorRo/KS1p7CDdeEfCHzAcSdbX5BzF87y6UO5LLwfXRUzhlyWg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Gene Healy, Akhil Reed Amar, Deborah Pearlstein, and Philip Bobbitt</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>103</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The President has launched a sustained, long-term military campaign against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. But did he have constitutional power to do so? The Constitution carefully divides the war powers of the United States between Congress and the President. Article II provides that “The President shall be Commander in Chief.” But Article I provides that “The Congress shall have Power … To Declare War.” Did the President exceed his authority and violate the Constitution?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The President has launched a sustained, long-term military campaign against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. But did he have constitutional power to do so? The Constitution carefully divides the war powers of the United States between Congress and the President. Article II provides that “The President shall be Commander in Chief.” But Article I provides that “The Congress shall have Power … To Declare War.” Did the President exceed his authority and violate the Constitution?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#102 - Should The U.S. Adopt The Right To Be Forgotten Online?</title>
			<itunes:title>#102 - Should The U.S. Adopt The Right To Be Forgotten Online?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:38</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/bb904623cbae034256b57d899d06a0b2/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">bb904623cbae034256b57d899d06a0b2</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5298c</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5298c</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zSgm05KenGzrmQyjoueNJdbd39na9J2NFOeHg8bVTHuLJ22c04DBSd8O+fHH6LE8GVzwkaYEvYX31ncLr664Ijg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Paul Nemitz, Andrew McLaughlin, Eric Posner, and Jonathan Zittrain.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>102</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In 2014, the European Union’s Court of Justice determined that individuals have a right to be forgotten, “the right—under certain conditions—to ask search engines to remove links with personal information about them.” It is not absolute, but meant to be balanced against other fundamental rights, like freedom of expression. In a half year following the Court’s decision, Google received over 180,000 removal requests. Of those reviewed and processed, 40.5% were granted. Largely seen as a victory in Europe, in the U.S., the reaction has been overwhelmingly negative. Was this ruling a blow to free speech and public information, or a win for privacy and human dignity?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>In 2014, the European Union’s Court of Justice determined that individuals have a right to be forgotten, “the right—under certain conditions—to ask search engines to remove links with personal information about them.” It is not absolute, but meant to be balanced against other fundamental rights, like freedom of expression. In a half year following the Court’s decision, Google received over 180,000 removal requests. Of those reviewed and processed, 40.5% were granted. Largely seen as a victory in Europe, in the U.S., the reaction has been overwhelmingly negative. Was this ruling a blow to free speech and public information, or a win for privacy and human dignity?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#101 - Are Liberals Stifling Intellectual Diversity?</title>
			<itunes:title>#101 - Are Liberals Stifling Intellectual Diversity?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/27a6e150202f7af9d088fadaa0333d8b/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">27a6e150202f7af9d088fadaa0333d8b</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5298d</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5298d</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9znY/ZX7eeYZ3njpIi7eHm9XvTlnR4X+DexHfaPHndxj6EEZj2nxcUUgEnNuPkNj3rWTa5AmvWBPKuOpQKhXjdeQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Greg Lukianoff, Angus Johnston, Kirsten Powers, and Jeremy Mayer.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>101</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>What is college for? For many, it’s a time for personal and intellectual growth, to meet new people, and to explore ideas and philosophies that challenge their beliefs. Or is it? Recent cancellations of conservative speakers, rescinded honorary degrees, and scrutiny of certain campus groups have heightened perceptions that there is pervasive liberal intolerance on campuses. Are liberals shutting down speech and debate on campus? Or is this theory a myth, based on the preponderance of liberals at universities rather than intentionally discriminatory actions?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>What is college for? For many, it’s a time for personal and intellectual growth, to meet new people, and to explore ideas and philosophies that challenge their beliefs. Or is it? Recent cancellations of conservative speakers, rescinded honorary degrees, and scrutiny of certain campus groups have heightened perceptions that there is pervasive liberal intolerance on campuses. Are liberals shutting down speech and debate on campus? Or is this theory a myth, based on the preponderance of liberals at universities rather than intentionally discriminatory actions?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#100 - Should The World Bet On America?</title>
			<itunes:title>#100 - Should The World Bet On America?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/df1acfc941ee46d83380d721f438f742/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">df1acfc941ee46d83380d721f438f742</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5298e</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5298e</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zDAPC4Vhojn7XnhhFdbm0GfdRsmusx7eJVWZLHaPFgUl8CE0BIF7cE0X0Xt+Jb9Xl2SXG45/OgJ1znFPpNNu9ng==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Josef Joffe, Chrystia Freeland, Peter Zeihan, and James Rickards</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>100</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>America owes $6 trillion to China, our sprawling military complex often appears helpless against disparate threats abroad, and the War on Terror has stripped us of the moral high ground. Washington is paralyzed by bitter partisanship, our children are falling behind their international peers, and our middle class is no longer the world’s most affluent. But we’ve been warned about America’s decline before. Remember Sputnik? Yes, times are tough, but America is recovering from the Great Recession faster than almost any other advanced country, an energy boom could add billions to the GDP, we’re still a leader in technological innovation, and our military strength and geopolitical advantages remain unrivaled. Are our best days behind us, or should the world still bet on America?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>America owes $6 trillion to China, our sprawling military complex often appears helpless against disparate threats abroad, and the War on Terror has stripped us of the moral high ground. Washington is paralyzed by bitter partisanship, our children are falling behind their international peers, and our middle class is no longer the world’s most affluent. But we’ve been warned about America’s decline before. Remember Sputnik? Yes, times are tough, but America is recovering from the Great Recession faster than almost any other advanced country, an energy boom could add billions to the GDP, we’re still a leader in technological innovation, and our military strength and geopolitical advantages remain unrivaled. Are our best days behind us, or should the world still bet on America?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tribute To David Carr</title>
			<itunes:title>Tribute To David Carr</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2015 20:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>8:47</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/16c32447bf45b71973906a15f2127836/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">16c32447bf45b71973906a15f2127836</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5298f</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5298f</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zBommYRv1wyqt2DYC+frpDPnYmdudZuv2Rh2jhy0KIinsyxnp7bcx8vLpyE9vaVvUh0wkmhvwkzp730jreP568w==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Upon hearing the news of the sudden passing of The New York Times's David Carr on February 12th, 2015, we assembled this rememberance. David appeared on our stage on October 27, 2009 arguing against the debate motion: Good Riddance to Mainstream Media.]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Upon hearing the news of the sudden passing of The New York Times's David Carr on February 12th, 2015, we assembled this rememberance. David appeared on our stage on October 27, 2009 arguing against the debate motion: Good Riddance to Mainstream Media.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Upon hearing the news of the sudden passing of The New York Times's David Carr on February 12th, 2015, we assembled this rememberance. David appeared on our stage on October 27, 2009 arguing against the debate motion: Good Riddance to Mainstream Media.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[#99 - Is Amazon The Reader's Friend?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[#99 - Is Amazon The Reader's Friend?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/c798fc18518932df1a4f070088656ff8/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c798fc18518932df1a4f070088656ff8</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52990</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52990</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zVw+7qYqw9YXyqOHjtXFdrb+5Dg2FjuX8Qg6CCw7hfmNHYX0dZVJ3iQuXO0PqTJI/4GdUzSvrFl7VuDc2bxuqfg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Joe Konrath, Franklin Foer, Matthew Yglesias, and Scott Turow</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>99</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In late 2014, Amazon and the publishing house Hachette settled a months-long dispute over who should set the price for e-books. In Amazon’s view, lower prices mean more sales and more readers, and that benefits everyone. But for publishers, the price of an e-book must reflect the investment made, from the author’s advance to a book’s production. The conflict, resolved for now, has only raised more questions about the value of books, Amazon’s business practices, and the role of publishers. Is book publishing an oligopoly, a dinosaur in need of disruption? Is Amazon, which accounts for 41% of all new book and 67% of all e-book sales, a monopoly? Who is doing right by readers and the future of books?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>In late 2014, Amazon and the publishing house Hachette settled a months-long dispute over who should set the price for e-books. In Amazon’s view, lower prices mean more sales and more readers, and that benefits everyone. But for publishers, the price of an e-book must reflect the investment made, from the author’s advance to a book’s production. The conflict, resolved for now, has only raised more questions about the value of books, Amazon’s business practices, and the role of publishers. Is book publishing an oligopoly, a dinosaur in need of disruption? Is Amazon, which accounts for 41% of all new book and 67% of all e-book sales, a monopoly? Who is doing right by readers and the future of books?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Retrospective On The Freedom Of Speech</title>
			<itunes:title>Retrospective On The Freedom Of Speech</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>13:16</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/24138eb08e3fe47368ef9f71ea5ce093/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">24138eb08e3fe47368ef9f71ea5ce093</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52991</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52991</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zAPZVEI1M3yzl1HjAfwq2RWgwYdUdJAG7GlpLwNU4T8IqGqOtKk+9/t9Z8BjBHi2a7UuIZSEWiynnYCooYABTJg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Thinking back to a 2006 debate in the context of the Charlie Hebdo attack</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>With the world outraged by the attacks on satirical newspaper, Charlie Hebdo, last week in Paris, we think back to our debate from 2006 on the motion: Freedom of Expression Must Include the License to Offend. The debaters were Philip Gourevitch, David Cesarani, Christopher Hitchens, Daisy Khan, Signe Wilkinson, and Mari Matsuda. The complete debate can be heard at http://intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/past-debates/item/545-freedom-of-expression-must-include-the-license-to-offend.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>With the world outraged by the attacks on satirical newspaper, Charlie Hebdo, last week in Paris, we think back to our debate from 2006 on the motion: Freedom of Expression Must Include the License to Offend. The debaters were Philip Gourevitch, David Cesarani, Christopher Hitchens, Daisy Khan, Signe Wilkinson, and Mari Matsuda. The complete debate can be heard at http://intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/past-debates/item/545-freedom-of-expression-must-include-the-license-to-offend.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#98 - Should We Genetically Modify Food?</title>
			<itunes:title>#98 - Should We Genetically Modify Food?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:37</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/c1ae2960363749e3bf2baa5c3256a9e9/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c1ae2960363749e3bf2baa5c3256a9e9</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52992</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52992</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zq1TtTL3ymDKTMYyvjf4conDppjBHgPuODvEZwvAjHtnKHrvV3SrafLqOKhizmex1ecO1LoHFr5ZQADos3Adh+Q==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>The debaters are Robert Fraley, Charles Benbrook, Alison Van Eenennaam, and Margaret Mellon.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>98</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Genetically modified (GM) foods have been around for decades, and they are developed for a number of different reasons—to fight disease, enhance flavor, resist pests, improve nutrition, survive drought. Across the country and around the world, communities are fighting the cultivation of genetically engineered crops. Are they safe? How do they impact the environment? Can they improve food security? Is the world better off with or without GM food?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Genetically modified (GM) foods have been around for decades, and they are developed for a number of different reasons—to fight disease, enhance flavor, resist pests, improve nutrition, survive drought. Across the country and around the world, communities are fighting the cultivation of genetically engineered crops. Are they safe? How do they impact the environment? Can they improve food security? Is the world better off with or without GM food?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#97 - Should We Legalize Assisted Suicide?</title>
			<itunes:title>#97 - Should We Legalize Assisted Suicide?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:17</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/ae60b31d8b186fc7b5b52127e28cf0de/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">ae60b31d8b186fc7b5b52127e28cf0de</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52993</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52993</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zlPZ/M7RWaxRG3tFbcgVAd99rjUH/7jWl3XJQ8csmU8R/XQF9CkGBxBvdKwMm1HS4TLWnMycXSU5YnDEw6dN38A==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Peter Singer, Andrew Solomon, Baroness Ilora Finlay, and Dr. Daniel Sulmasy</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In 1994, Oregon voters passed the Death with Dignity Act, which legalized physician-assisted suicide for the terminally ill. Since then, it has become legal in 4 more states, including New Mexico, where the state court ruling that it is constitutional is under appeal. Will these laws lead to a slippery slope, where the vulnerable are pressured to choose death and human life is devalued? Or do we need to recognize everyone’s basic right to autonomy? The debaters are Peter Singer, Baroness Ilora Finlay, Andrew Solomon, and Dr. Daniel Sulmasy.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>In 1994, Oregon voters passed the Death with Dignity Act, which legalized physician-assisted suicide for the terminally ill. Since then, it has become legal in 4 more states, including New Mexico, where the state court ruling that it is constitutional is under appeal. Will these laws lead to a slippery slope, where the vulnerable are pressured to choose death and human life is devalued? Or do we need to recognize everyone’s basic right to autonomy? The debaters are Peter Singer, Baroness Ilora Finlay, Andrew Solomon, and Dr. Daniel Sulmasy.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#96 - Does Income Inequality Impair The American Dream?</title>
			<itunes:title>#96 - Does Income Inequality Impair The American Dream?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:18</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/3ea26c742b37c5fb3d09dbffb3bec051/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3ea26c742b37c5fb3d09dbffb3bec051</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52994</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52994</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z0le7lm/Wm/WA4FW5DoW/dXdS40ow0BgtcqsV/Z8ZFZrv7JVw8PPRZz98JxmEVYXbkZZyP7sA+ByvkoVyn1A1Ig==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Elise Gould, Edward Conard, Nick Hanauer, and Scott Winship.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>96</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Income inequality has been on the rise for decades. In the last 30 years, the wages of the top 1% have grown by 154%, while the bottom 90% has seen growth of only 17%. As the rungs of the economic ladder move further and further apart, conventional wisdom says that it will become much more difficult to climb them. Opportunities for upward mobility—the American dream—will disappear as the deck becomes stacked against the middle class and the poor. But others see inequality as a positive, a sign of a dynamic and robust economy that, in the end, helps everyone. And contrary to public opinion, mobility has remained stable over the past few decades. If the American dream is dying, is it the result of income inequality? Or is disparity in income a red herring where more complex issues are at play? The Debaters are Elise Gould, Edward Conard, Nick Hanauer, and Scott Winship.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Income inequality has been on the rise for decades. In the last 30 years, the wages of the top 1% have grown by 154%, while the bottom 90% has seen growth of only 17%. As the rungs of the economic ladder move further and further apart, conventional wisdom says that it will become much more difficult to climb them. Opportunities for upward mobility—the American dream—will disappear as the deck becomes stacked against the middle class and the poor. But others see inequality as a positive, a sign of a dynamic and robust economy that, in the end, helps everyone. And contrary to public opinion, mobility has remained stable over the past few decades. If the American dream is dying, is it the result of income inequality? Or is disparity in income a red herring where more complex issues are at play? The Debaters are Elise Gould, Edward Conard, Nick Hanauer, and Scott Winship.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#95 - Mass Collection Of U.S. Phone Records Violates The Fourth Amendment</title>
			<itunes:title>#95 - Mass Collection Of U.S. Phone Records Violates The Fourth Amendment</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:17</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/b22ee69e799a010103945b74b772574a/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">b22ee69e799a010103945b74b772574a</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52995</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52995</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zNHvyhCoAXWUQMOJQgqzbCdKeyIhDw88GzcZaMsmYuZYk1zdi+2Gc1c0MzcSkxq+kXWvp4CoTaY0S0cWntzJM2g==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With  Alex Abdo, Elizabeth Wydra, Stewart Baker, and John Yoo</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>95</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Some say that the mass collection of U.S. phone records is a gross invasion of privacy. Others say that it is necessary to keep us safe. But what does the U.S. Constitution say? "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Is collection of phone records a “search” or “seizure"? If so, is it “unreasonable”? Does it require a particularized warrant and probable cause? These are among the most consequential—and controversial—constitutional questions of our time.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Some say that the mass collection of U.S. phone records is a gross invasion of privacy. Others say that it is necessary to keep us safe. But what does the U.S. Constitution say? "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Is collection of phone records a “search” or “seizure"? If so, is it “unreasonable”? Does it require a particularized warrant and probable cause? These are among the most consequential—and controversial—constitutional questions of our time.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[#94 - Will Flexing America's Muscles In The Middle East Make Things Worse?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[#94 - Will Flexing America's Muscles In The Middle East Make Things Worse?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:20</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/0a791d89189ec40bc515e7b8f1ecc41e/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">0a791d89189ec40bc515e7b8f1ecc41e</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52996</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52996</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zGvNyBfkAMt/HLBfSLMJfG8i7PFoIW94VCmtybg5CYr2JARPO5JsWfJfzv9s9iaYsBwOIHUJ31J/WOcU5o/Ejyg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Aaron David Miller, Paul Pillar, Michael Doran, and Bret Stephens</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The disintegration of Iraq, Syria’s ongoing civil war, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the promise and peril of the Arab Spring... What role should America play in the Middle East? For some America’s restraint has been a sign of disciplined leadership. But for others, it has been a sign of diminished strength and influence. Are we simply recognizing the limitations of our power, or does this embattled region require a bolder, more muscular, American presence? The debaters are Aaron David Miller, Michael Doran, Bret Stephens, and Paul Pillar.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The disintegration of Iraq, Syria’s ongoing civil war, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the promise and peril of the Arab Spring... What role should America play in the Middle East? For some America’s restraint has been a sign of disciplined leadership. But for others, it has been a sign of diminished strength and influence. Are we simply recognizing the limitations of our power, or does this embattled region require a bolder, more muscular, American presence? The debaters are Aaron David Miller, Michael Doran, Bret Stephens, and Paul Pillar.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#93 - Should We Embrace The Common Core?</title>
			<itunes:title>#93 - Should We Embrace The Common Core?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:38</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/b49d6a7b4390820e3bbdd00128e62f18/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">b49d6a7b4390820e3bbdd00128e62f18</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52997</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52997</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zXTwEodrAWWhHLeYW0F/PQ+94qbVgTW2IUue0RA5xGb2uw3Y2C+BFdmmP64hfzUN2yvQ1fWbVcdyDjffcfnXqsA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Carmel Martin, Michael Petrilli, Carol Burris, and Frederick Hess</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p> </p><p>In K-12 education, there is nothing more controversial than the Common Core State Standards, national academic standards in English and math. Adopted by more than 40 states, they were developed, in part, to address concerns that American students were falling behind their foreign counterparts. Has the federal government overreached and saddled our schools with standards that have been flawed from the start? The debaters are Carmel Martin, Carol Burris, Michael Petrill, and Frederick Hess.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p> </p><p>In K-12 education, there is nothing more controversial than the Common Core State Standards, national academic standards in English and math. Adopted by more than 40 states, they were developed, in part, to address concerns that American students were falling behind their foreign counterparts. Has the federal government overreached and saddled our schools with standards that have been flawed from the start? The debaters are Carmel Martin, Carol Burris, Michael Petrill, and Frederick Hess.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Retrospective On Hamas And Israel</title>
			<itunes:title>Retrospective On Hamas And Israel</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>18:32</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/921d88a04e0e5dabca204d234d0bee84/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">921d88a04e0e5dabca204d234d0bee84</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52998</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52998</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zsLirZOEJzfhTaLyGZHoM2kbYLaH1mO6Ue2sSWH6T1xyPsbte76TMvuc8I9O7rr1/u5MyDbGevuChJinevPYApw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Revisiting a debate from 2006</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Rising tensions between Israel and Hamas have come to a head this week with a dramatic eruption of conflict along the Gaza strip, making a debate we held back in 2006, less than a year after Hamas won a majority vote in the Palestinian parliament, all the more relevant today. The motion being debated that night was: Is A Democratically Elected Hamas Still A Terrorist Organization. The debate, held in front of a live audience in New York City, lasted well over an hour. We’ve culled a sample from each teams’ opening statements to give you a sense of their core arguments. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Rising tensions between Israel and Hamas have come to a head this week with a dramatic eruption of conflict along the Gaza strip, making a debate we held back in 2006, less than a year after Hamas won a majority vote in the Palestinian parliament, all the more relevant today. The motion being debated that night was: Is A Democratically Elected Hamas Still A Terrorist Organization. The debate, held in front of a live audience in New York City, lasted well over an hour. We’ve culled a sample from each teams’ opening statements to give you a sense of their core arguments. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#92 - Is There A Constitutional Right To Unlimited Spending On Political Speech?</title>
			<itunes:title>#92 - Is There A Constitutional Right To Unlimited Spending On Political Speech?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:17</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/d0d8791d1263f79d764fc74b65a17131/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">d0d8791d1263f79d764fc74b65a17131</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf52999</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf52999</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zhdgLFcQawt6TRmSuR0NdZ65zSr3ZKbtz7anJRIK5zWo6uq3fd2NVdCWCIUrGSkDZa8gMaDF9aESCP9Puzv62lQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Floyd Abrams, Nadine Strossen, Burt Neuborne, and Zephyr Teachout</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>92</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Is independent political speech the linchpin of our democracy or its Achilles' heel? For democracy to work, some say, citizens (and corporations, and unions, and media outlets, and other voluntary organizations) must be allowed to express their views on the issues, candidates, and elections of the day. This proposition, they say, is exactly why the First Amendment protects the freedom of speech and of the press. On this view, restrictions on independent political speech undermine and subvert our constitutional structure. But others take a different view: If everyone can spend as much money as they like to express their political views, then some voices will be amplified, magnified and enhanced — while others will be all but drowned out. On this view, it is this inequality of influence that subverts our constitutional structure — and restrictions that level the playing field actually enhance rather than abridge the freedom of speech.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Is independent political speech the linchpin of our democracy or its Achilles' heel? For democracy to work, some say, citizens (and corporations, and unions, and media outlets, and other voluntary organizations) must be allowed to express their views on the issues, candidates, and elections of the day. This proposition, they say, is exactly why the First Amendment protects the freedom of speech and of the press. On this view, restrictions on independent political speech undermine and subvert our constitutional structure. But others take a different view: If everyone can spend as much money as they like to express their political views, then some voices will be amplified, magnified and enhanced — while others will be all but drowned out. On this view, it is this inequality of influence that subverts our constitutional structure — and restrictions that level the playing field actually enhance rather than abridge the freedom of speech.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#91 - Is Death Final?</title>
			<itunes:title>#91 - Is Death Final?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:41</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/9cb94da1dbc01c70b78fd5ca2f2a4c28/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">9cb94da1dbc01c70b78fd5ca2f2a4c28</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5299a</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5299a</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9ztyHe0TVXpj4YH8FhMcimyDg9Ej9VaTzNp57esVMZ4dd1b1O9z4/trKAI3WiS88kMKg+qYmxl36pVudyAUBv5Nw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Dr. Eben Alexander, Dr. Raymond Moody, Sean Carroll, and Dr. Steven Novella</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>91</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If consciousness is just the workings of neurons and synapses, how do we explain the phenomenon of near-death experience? Is the prospect of an existence after death “real” and provable by science, or a construct of wishful thinking about our own mortality? The debaters are Dr. Eben Alexander, Sean Carroll, Dr. Raymond Moody, and Dr. Steven Novella.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>If consciousness is just the workings of neurons and synapses, how do we explain the phenomenon of near-death experience? Is the prospect of an existence after death “real” and provable by science, or a construct of wishful thinking about our own mortality? The debaters are Dr. Eben Alexander, Sean Carroll, Dr. Raymond Moody, and Dr. Steven Novella.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#90 - Do Millennials Stand A Chance?</title>
			<itunes:title>#90 - Do Millennials Stand A Chance?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:09</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/602561c3204b0806253ca625ae24a629/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">602561c3204b0806253ca625ae24a629</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5299b</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5299b</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zmBNLSdWptsJDVMLEjZlbVJnaS7C+RQdewkoLg0yPI05OxWNBaCupwGvFBWCh2ElTbY1hrpaTWuC1pywTJpqbVw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Binta Niambi Brown, W. Keith Campbell, David D. Burstein, Jessica Grose</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>90</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Millennials—growing up with revolutionary technology and entering adulthood in a time of recession—have recently been much maligned. Are their critics right? Is this generation uniquely coddled, narcissistic, and lazy? Or have we let conventional wisdom blind us to their openness to change and innovation, and optimism in the face of uncertainty, which, in any generation, are qualities to be admired? The debaters are Binta Niambi Brown, David D. Burstein, W. Keith Campbell, and Jessica Grose.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Millennials—growing up with revolutionary technology and entering adulthood in a time of recession—have recently been much maligned. Are their critics right? Is this generation uniquely coddled, narcissistic, and lazy? Or have we let conventional wisdom blind us to their openness to change and innovation, and optimism in the face of uncertainty, which, in any generation, are qualities to be admired? The debaters are Binta Niambi Brown, David D. Burstein, W. Keith Campbell, and Jessica Grose.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Controversy Over Ayaan Hirsi Ali At Brandeis University</title>
			<itunes:title>The Controversy Over Ayaan Hirsi Ali At Brandeis University</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 02:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>15:00</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/90e9bdb26136a9bcd828f97395c62a4d/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">90e9bdb26136a9bcd828f97395c62a4d</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5299c</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5299c</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z+09Inm+E0ozLLTMEopCsqeYHGJcno/Cx3bys/pF8wrrTxCOseKs+hccfS4bxKUOmHmr//kU163d1K8xgUB/qFA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Women's rights activist, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, became the center a media firestorm last week, when Brandies University reversed its decision to grant her an honorary degree. While they commend her for being "a compelling public figure and advocate...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p> </p><p>Women's rights activist, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, became the center a media firestorm last week, when Brandies University reversed its decision to grant her an honorary degree. While they commend her for being "a compelling public figure and advocate for women’s rights," many of her past statements against Islam have offended students and faculty at the Massachusetts institution. In this podcast, we hear some of these past statements in the form of an Intelligence Squared U.S. debate from 2010, where she argued against the motion, Islam is a Religion of Peace. http://intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/past-debates/item/573-islam-is-a-religion-of-peace</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p> </p><p>Women's rights activist, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, became the center a media firestorm last week, when Brandies University reversed its decision to grant her an honorary degree. While they commend her for being "a compelling public figure and advocate for women’s rights," many of her past statements against Islam have offended students and faculty at the Massachusetts institution. In this podcast, we hear some of these past statements in the form of an Intelligence Squared U.S. debate from 2010, where she argued against the motion, Islam is a Religion of Peace. http://intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/past-debates/item/573-islam-is-a-religion-of-peace</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#89 - More Clicks, Fewer Bricks: Is The Lecture Hall Obsolete?</title>
			<itunes:title>#89 - More Clicks, Fewer Bricks: Is The Lecture Hall Obsolete?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>53:13</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/c0022abdffb126516788886652e48dc3/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c0022abdffb126516788886652e48dc3</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5299d</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5299d</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zGC17nOl25ksLEcURYmN4fT7IPLMilNG+Zp2B0GfHQMQGE2BVZSaMpUsW0oJuPGkxUnW3K0O+ghxcS01S0Jsshg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Anant Agarwal, Ben Nelson, Jonathan Cole, and Rebecca Schuman</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Is the college of the future online? With the popularity of MOOCs (massive open online courses) and the availability of online degree programs at a fraction of their on-campus price, we are experiencing an exciting experiment in higher education. Does the traditional classroom stand a chance? Will online education be the great equalizer, or is a campus-based college experience still necessary?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Is the college of the future online? With the popularity of MOOCs (massive open online courses) and the availability of online degree programs at a fraction of their on-campus price, we are experiencing an exciting experiment in higher education. Does the traditional classroom stand a chance? Will online education be the great equalizer, or is a campus-based college experience still necessary?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Does Affirmative Action On Campus Do More Harm Than Good?</title>
			<itunes:title>Does Affirmative Action On Campus Do More Harm Than Good?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:09:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:41</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/3379b0c30523f7f76c14d6f1f5423dae/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">3379b0c30523f7f76c14d6f1f5423dae</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5299e</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5299e</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zvzrQVN7rIw9CCuplkS0fEgLBKyGR2F0utfrXorTpzxuRPLparfTXsYvJ57OXl8jqJHqvkSifPdYo/LZLMUYPrQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Affirmative action, when used as a factor in college admissions, is meant to foster diversity and provide equal opportunities in education for underrepresented minorities. But is it achieving its stated goals and helping the population it was created...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Affirmative action, when used as a factor in college admissions, is meant to foster diversity and provide equal opportunities in education for underrepresented minorities. But is it achieving its stated goals and helping the population it was created to support? Its critics point to students struggling to keep up in schools mismatched to their abilities and to the fact that the policy can be manipulated to benefit affluent and middle class students who already possess many educational advantages. Is it time to overhaul or abolish affirmative action? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Affirmative action, when used as a factor in college admissions, is meant to foster diversity and provide equal opportunities in education for underrepresented minorities. But is it achieving its stated goals and helping the population it was created to support? Its critics point to students struggling to keep up in schools mismatched to their abilities and to the fact that the policy can be manipulated to benefit affluent and middle class students who already possess many educational advantages. Is it time to overhaul or abolish affirmative action? </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>#88 - Is Russia A Marginal Power?</title>
			<itunes:title>#88 - Is Russia A Marginal Power?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:41</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/5abd0acdbb542b79d3c3507f76d1a63c/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5abd0acdbb542b79d3c3507f76d1a63c</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf5299f</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf5299f</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zaMV0GsRbWysBIHNXNXOenC1b2U8H81mdea6Vf6/fN27O45VNYk4mq+XZycSU4a7/m9Km6mIu4src481ioFgTQw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With Ian Bremmer, Edward Lucas, Amb. Robert D. Blackwill, and Peter Hitchens</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:episode>88</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Disarming Syria. Asylum for Edward Snowden. Arming Iran. Deploying troops to Crimea. Is Vladimir Putin flexing his muscles, while our own president fades into the background of world politics, or is it all a global game of smoke and mirrors? Russia is one of the world’s largest oil producers and has the power of veto on the U.N. Security Council, but it remains an authoritarian state, rife with corruption and economic struggles. Is our toxic relationship something to worry about, or is Putin’s Russia fading in importance?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Disarming Syria. Asylum for Edward Snowden. Arming Iran. Deploying troops to Crimea. Is Vladimir Putin flexing his muscles, while our own president fades into the background of world politics, or is it all a global game of smoke and mirrors? Russia is one of the world’s largest oil producers and has the power of veto on the U.N. Security Council, but it remains an authoritarian state, rife with corruption and economic struggles. Is our toxic relationship something to worry about, or is Putin’s Russia fading in importance?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Does The President Have Constitutional Power To Target And Kill U.S. Citizens Abroad?</title>
			<itunes:title>Does The President Have Constitutional Power To Target And Kill U.S. Citizens Abroad?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:43:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:40</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/18ceb2c1bf7f8440d004609c504e9818/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">18ceb2c1bf7f8440d004609c504e9818</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529a0</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529a0</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z5pqPkRTh2D9p5cvWyXGynblQfB5//X6UGgBw42oU4bPUhyYMExbktB6HE0OerVGHID+cG+N3L/f0z2KLpmv5gA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>With the drone strike on accused terrorist and New Mexico-born Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen, President Obama has tested the limits of the executive branch’s powers. Does the president have constitutional authority under the due process clause to...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>With the drone strike on accused terrorist and New Mexico-born Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen, President Obama has tested the limits of the executive branch’s powers. Does the president have constitutional authority under the due process clause to kill U.S. citizens abroad, or is it a violation of this clause to unilaterally decide to target and kill Americans?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>With the drone strike on accused terrorist and New Mexico-born Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen, President Obama has tested the limits of the executive branch’s powers. Does the president have constitutional authority under the due process clause to kill U.S. citizens abroad, or is it a violation of this clause to unilaterally decide to target and kill Americans?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Was Snowden Justified?</title>
			<itunes:title>Was Snowden Justified?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:36:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:42</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/d3844e8aef8fbe19b6057c59150c8cc8/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">d3844e8aef8fbe19b6057c59150c8cc8</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529a1</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529a1</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zC0nvL00g88Rt2lmmvVBCZBPuIfnzf+KjotMgUMfJV6nwXMRxafmHwJ60KnpVUD8WFuEgPZg6J6CrwXBMazyhCg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Has Edward Snowden done the U.S. a great service? There is no doubt that his release of highly classified stolen documents has sparked an important public debate, even forcing what could be a major presidential overhaul of the NSA’s surveillance...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Has Edward Snowden done the U.S. a great service? There is no doubt that his release of highly classified stolen documents has sparked an important public debate, even forcing what could be a major presidential overhaul of the NSA’s surveillance programs. But have his actions—which include the downloading of an estimated 1.7 million files—tipped off our enemies and endangered national security? Is Snowden a whistleblower, or is he a criminal?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Has Edward Snowden done the U.S. a great service? There is no doubt that his release of highly classified stolen documents has sparked an important public debate, even forcing what could be a major presidential overhaul of the NSA’s surveillance programs. But have his actions—which include the downloading of an estimated 1.7 million files—tipped off our enemies and endangered national security? Is Snowden a whistleblower, or is he a criminal?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is Obamacare Beyond Rescue?</title>
			<itunes:title>Is Obamacare Beyond Rescue?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:22:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:55</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/95a3a53ae72dc4e407d97529aaa6c3b0/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">95a3a53ae72dc4e407d97529aaa6c3b0</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529a2</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529a2</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zTqoRUnu/nGXfhUaJLxyG4pLTJxKBJSWGRI1QAjT9cQ5AeAGiKpnasEKZ1oo3ZTXivbU2g1862+s2MeauDmfG9g==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[With the disastrous launch of the HealthCare.gov website, critics of the Affordable Care Act, or “Obamacare,” were given more fuel for the fire. Is this political hot potato's inevitability once again at stake? And is the medical community...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>With the disastrous launch of the HealthCare.gov website, critics of the Affordable Care Act, or “Obamacare,” were given more fuel for the fire. Is this political hot potato's inevitability once again at stake? And is the medical community really on board with the law, or resisting (rewriting?) it from the sidelines?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>With the disastrous launch of the HealthCare.gov website, critics of the Affordable Care Act, or “Obamacare,” were given more fuel for the fire. Is this political hot potato's inevitability once again at stake? And is the medical community really on board with the law, or resisting (rewriting?) it from the sidelines?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reconsidering The Minimum Wage</title>
			<itunes:title>Reconsidering The Minimum Wage</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 20:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>14:43</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/ea001c86557f11acd152b870fe8900b2/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">ea001c86557f11acd152b870fe8900b2</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529a3</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529a3</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zgGtGPAht3Wq4d6ROvyAcnhsIB2c0pQ3rQaCdtrekrVckOHeIKifbh3OyWT7a0eVrjG/qMWfPxka66q3bYidjoA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Although widespread retail-worker strikes failed to enact a rise of the federal minimum wage in 2013, on the state level, the tide is turning. Last week 13 states started the New Year by raised their minimum wage, and as many as 11 states, and...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Although widespread retail-worker strikes failed to enact a rise of the federal minimum wage in 2013, on the state level, the tide is turning. Last week 13 states started the New Year by raised their minimum wage, and as many as 11 states, and Washington, D.C., are considering  passing similar legislation in 2014. To shed light on the evolving public debate surrounding wage gaps in the US we are revisiting a debate we staged last Spring “Abolish the Minimum Wage.” That evening James Dorn of the Cato Institute and popular economist Russ Roberts argued for the motion, and faced Jared Bernstein from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Karen Kornbluh, a former senior adviser to President Barack Obama. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Although widespread retail-worker strikes failed to enact a rise of the federal minimum wage in 2013, on the state level, the tide is turning. Last week 13 states started the New Year by raised their minimum wage, and as many as 11 states, and Washington, D.C., are considering  passing similar legislation in 2014. To shed light on the evolving public debate surrounding wage gaps in the US we are revisiting a debate we staged last Spring “Abolish the Minimum Wage.” That evening James Dorn of the Cato Institute and popular economist Russ Roberts argued for the motion, and faced Jared Bernstein from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Karen Kornbluh, a former senior adviser to President Barack Obama. </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Don't Eat Anything With A Face]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Don't Eat Anything With A Face]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:39</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/ac85c31e508254a80aa6c8adcee1a209/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">ac85c31e508254a80aa6c8adcee1a209</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529a4</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529a4</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9ze5dHfl2uWoWumg5bhz/MtRGKdQCrZBTp1VKRsxxzOlvwFwsZaEtAt5+O0PbSWv843LnRPBL834a1chQj73rSKQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>According to a 2009 poll, around 1% of American adults reported eating no animal products. In 2011 that number rose to 2.5%--more than double, but still dwarfed by the 48% who reported eating meat, fish or poultry at all of their meals. In this...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>According to a 2009 poll, around 1% of American adults reported eating no animal products. In 2011 that number rose to 2.5%--more than double, but still dwarfed by the 48% who reported eating meat, fish or poultry at all of their meals. In this country, most of us are blessed with an abundance of food and food choices. So taking into account our health, the environment and ethical concerns, which diet is best? Are we or aren't we meant to be carnivores?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>According to a 2009 poll, around 1% of American adults reported eating no animal products. In 2011 that number rose to 2.5%--more than double, but still dwarfed by the 48% who reported eating meat, fish or poultry at all of their meals. In this country, most of us are blessed with an abundance of food and food choices. So taking into account our health, the environment and ethical concerns, which diet is best? Are we or aren't we meant to be carnivores?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Does Spying Keep Us Safe?</title>
			<itunes:title>Does Spying Keep Us Safe?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:56:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:42</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/d87aaafacbf176d63f29f6cc678443d8/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">d87aaafacbf176d63f29f6cc678443d8</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529a5</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529a5</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zcyMAwgWPfqX2zjp6eyBg2Z3y5nytZNLB0scD611z75EDG7HadiR0HymGQQ4dNB6HR+p1V/FY6A9qLL6Tsmky7w==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>The NSA collects data on billions of phone calls and internet communications per day. Are these surveillance programs legal? Do they keep us safe? If not for the former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, most Americans would be unaware of the vast amounts...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The NSA collects data on billions of phone calls and internet communications per day. Are these surveillance programs legal? Do they keep us safe? If not for the former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, most Americans would be unaware of the vast amounts of information their government is secretly collecting, all in the name of national security. But whether you believe leakers are heroes or traitors, an important public conversation has finally begun, and we should ask ourselves: What tradeoffs are we willing to make between security and privacy?As Benjamin Franklin might have asked, "Are we giving up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety, and thus deserving of neither?"</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The NSA collects data on billions of phone calls and internet communications per day. Are these surveillance programs legal? Do they keep us safe? If not for the former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, most Americans would be unaware of the vast amounts of information their government is secretly collecting, all in the name of national security. But whether you believe leakers are heroes or traitors, an important public conversation has finally begun, and we should ask ourselves: What tradeoffs are we willing to make between security and privacy?As Benjamin Franklin might have asked, "Are we giving up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety, and thus deserving of neither?"</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Has The Constitutional Right To Bear Arms Outlived Its Usefulness?</title>
			<itunes:title>Has The Constitutional Right To Bear Arms Outlived Its Usefulness?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:41</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/5a55f2312dc022774e2648f5fb9e756c/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5a55f2312dc022774e2648f5fb9e756c</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529a6</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529a6</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zRtsVU11a0FbD+/6XMKRx7dIgJUqhjKPrcBjBTvxqCVtbQGcC+1ylle1Dxl+cd9G5+MwB/Req/1esJydMYJZBxw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Recent mass shooting tragedies have renewed the national debate over the 2nd Amendment. Gun ownership and homicide rates are higher in the U.S. than in any other developed nation, but gun violence has decreased over the last two decades even as gun...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Recent mass shooting tragedies have renewed the national debate over the 2nd Amendment. Gun ownership and homicide rates are higher in the U.S. than in any other developed nation, but gun violence has decreased over the last two decades even as gun ownership may be increasing. Over 200 years have passed since James Madison introduced the Bill of Rights, the country has changed, and so have its guns. Is the right to bear arms now at odds with the common good, or is it as necessary today as it was in 1789? The debaters are Alan Dershowitz, David Kopel, Sanford Levinson, and Eugene Volokh.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Recent mass shooting tragedies have renewed the national debate over the 2nd Amendment. Gun ownership and homicide rates are higher in the U.S. than in any other developed nation, but gun violence has decreased over the last two decades even as gun ownership may be increasing. Over 200 years have passed since James Madison introduced the Bill of Rights, the country has changed, and so have its guns. Is the right to bear arms now at odds with the common good, or is it as necessary today as it was in 1789? The debaters are Alan Dershowitz, David Kopel, Sanford Levinson, and Eugene Volokh.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Let Anyone Take A Job Anywhere</title>
			<itunes:title>Let Anyone Take A Job Anywhere</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:39</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/98f5a684f1a972af058b55333de67e77/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">98f5a684f1a972af058b55333de67e77</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529a7</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529a7</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zMjVF5OzmSnzOOtWJ7MTkulFKpb4GF9TKffTFp5/M9CmzSGaTFf8LhAs7G/Uy8ifZE2Bc7ev25UE1lJ57Emuj2g==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>If we value a free market in goods and free movement of capital, should we embrace the free movement of labor? Reciprocal treaties would allow citizens of the U.S. and other countries to work legally across borders. Would the elimination of barriers...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If we value a free market in goods and free movement of capital, should we embrace the free movement of labor? Reciprocal treaties would allow citizens of the U.S. and other countries to work legally across borders. Would the elimination of barriers in the labor market depress wages and flood the marketplace with workers? Or would the benefits of a flexible labor supply be a boon to our economy, all while raising the standard of living for anyone willing to work?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>If we value a free market in goods and free movement of capital, should we embrace the free movement of labor? Reciprocal treaties would allow citizens of the U.S. and other countries to work legally across borders. Would the elimination of barriers in the labor market depress wages and flood the marketplace with workers? Or would the benefits of a flexible labor supply be a boon to our economy, all while raising the standard of living for anyone willing to work?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>For A Better Future, Live In A Red State</title>
			<itunes:title>For A Better Future, Live In A Red State</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/d6f02a53855584713e7d365272423bbb/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">d6f02a53855584713e7d365272423bbb</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529a8</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529a8</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zyrR9GIoTL9TRYuQiF5KebuQaRCpC+amcE9qUAI3bal6HKdyMnJw99W2czGJxKdd/Nsxl6QUgKN8iCCqEfFjmTg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>While gridlock and division in Washington make it difficult for either party or ideology to set the policy agenda, single-party government prevails in three-quarters of the states. In 24 states Republicans control the governorship and both houses of...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>While gridlock and division in Washington make it difficult for either party or ideology to set the policy agenda, single-party government prevails in three-quarters of the states. In 24 states Republicans control the governorship and both houses of the legislature, and in 13 states Democrats enjoy one-party control. Comparing economic growth, education, health care, quality of life and environment, and the strength of civil society, do red or blue states win out?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>While gridlock and division in Washington make it difficult for either party or ideology to set the policy agenda, single-party government prevails in three-quarters of the states. In 24 states Republicans control the governorship and both houses of the legislature, and in 13 states Democrats enjoy one-party control. Comparing economic growth, education, health care, quality of life and environment, and the strength of civil society, do red or blue states win out?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Should We Break Up The Big Banks?</title>
			<itunes:title>Should We Break Up The Big Banks?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:15:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/1a071bbd20bed794d955f5d0b2e84500/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1a071bbd20bed794d955f5d0b2e84500</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529a9</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529a9</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zIPN3julmGkEdXRsiZesIUT8yNCWEsYdCeZUmSmNEMVMPI5Z0/lRTQK1Sw6WD0OPl0LtprSlwZ7PnSjXBU8XzPg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>To prevent the collapse of the global financial system in 2008, The Treasury committed 245 billion in taxpayer dollars to stabilize America’s banking institutions. Today, banks that were once “too big to fail” have only grown bigger....</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>To prevent the collapse of the global financial system in 2008, The Treasury committed 245 billion in taxpayer dollars to stabilize America’s banking institutions. Today, banks that were once “too big to fail” have only grown bigger. Were size and complexity at the root of the financial crisis, or do calls to break up the big banks ignore real benefits that only economies of scale can pass on to customers and investors? The debaters are Richard Fisher, Simon Johnson, Douglas Elliott, and Paul Salzman.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>To prevent the collapse of the global financial system in 2008, The Treasury committed 245 billion in taxpayer dollars to stabilize America’s banking institutions. Today, banks that were once “too big to fail” have only grown bigger. Were size and complexity at the root of the financial crisis, or do calls to break up the big banks ignore real benefits that only economies of scale can pass on to customers and investors? The debaters are Richard Fisher, Simon Johnson, Douglas Elliott, and Paul Salzman.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is The Two-Party System Making America Ungovernable?</title>
			<itunes:title>Is The Two-Party System Making America Ungovernable?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:42:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>16:02</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/128cce6ddad0d0a0d01dba77d9a88c5c/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">128cce6ddad0d0a0d01dba77d9a88c5c</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529aa</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529aa</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zfaMD12FhdEaKwm1tsuOkJaorSbsnw37T+mjpwZJENYFRY8h0WbCjShhO47aYWGFNP+k9OfI4iF8tpMhtG6oubw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>The government shutdown is a dramatic display of the growing strife not only between the Republican and Democratic parties, but also, among the GOP itself.  For some, the shut down has even called into question the effectiveness of the American...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The government shutdown is a dramatic display of the growing strife not only between the Republican and Democratic parties, but also, among the GOP itself.  For some, the shut down has even called into question the effectiveness of the American political system, which makes a debate we held back in 2011 all the more relevant today. The motion was “The Two-Party System is Making America Ungovernable”. The team arguing for the motion included Arianna Huffington, co-founder and editor-in-chief of the Huffington Post, and NYTimes Op-Ed Columnist David Brooks. The team arguing against the motion, and in support of the two-party system, included political satirist PJ O’Rourke and author and columnist Zev Chafets.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The government shutdown is a dramatic display of the growing strife not only between the Republican and Democratic parties, but also, among the GOP itself.  For some, the shut down has even called into question the effectiveness of the American political system, which makes a debate we held back in 2011 all the more relevant today. The motion was “The Two-Party System is Making America Ungovernable”. The team arguing for the motion included Arianna Huffington, co-founder and editor-in-chief of the Huffington Post, and NYTimes Op-Ed Columnist David Brooks. The team arguing against the motion, and in support of the two-party system, included political satirist PJ O’Rourke and author and columnist Zev Chafets.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is The Two-Party System Making America Ungovernable?</title>
			<itunes:title>Is The Two-Party System Making America Ungovernable?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 01:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>16:02</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/dea993f785815259442d96eb49f11134/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">dea993f785815259442d96eb49f11134</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529ab</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529ab</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zfaMD12FhdEaKwm1tsuOkJaorSbsnw37T+mjpwZJENYFRY8h0WbCjShhO47aYWGFNP+k9OfI4iF8tpMhtG6oubw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>The government shutdown is a dramatic display of the growing strife not only between the Republican and Democratic parties, but also, among the GOP itself. For some, the shut down has even called into question the effectiveness of the American...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The government shutdown is a dramatic display of the growing strife not only between the Republican and Democratic parties, but also, among the GOP itself. For some, the shut down has even called into question the effectiveness of the American political system, which makes a debate we held back in 2011 all the more relevant today. The motion was "The Two-Party System is Making America Ungovernable". The team arguing for the motion included Arianna Huffington, co-founder and editor-in-chief of the Huffington Post, and NYTimes Op-Ed Columnist David Brooks. The team arguing against the motion, and in support of the two-party system, included political satirist PJ O’Rourke and author and columnist Zev Chafets.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The government shutdown is a dramatic display of the growing strife not only between the Republican and Democratic parties, but also, among the GOP itself. For some, the shut down has even called into question the effectiveness of the American political system, which makes a debate we held back in 2011 all the more relevant today. The motion was "The Two-Party System is Making America Ungovernable". The team arguing for the motion included Arianna Huffington, co-founder and editor-in-chief of the Huffington Post, and NYTimes Op-Ed Columnist David Brooks. The team arguing against the motion, and in support of the two-party system, included political satirist PJ O’Rourke and author and columnist Zev Chafets.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Healthcare Retrospective</title>
			<itunes:title>Healthcare Retrospective</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>19:11</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/d71205be11cbb8fb5814f1e74fece6b9/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">d71205be11cbb8fb5814f1e74fece6b9</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529ac</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529ac</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zPExLsznheDpQM10I7TjHurAtl1oiKK2SDm1P18/jjG7FD0AFSezau+Lxnj+sIQw1pV4wJtI5273+ejk0Mqq56Q==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Although President Obama signed it into law in March of 2010, the Affordable Care Act remains one of the nation’s most divisive issues. Over the past nearly four years, House Republicans  have voted 40 times to repeal the law in part or in...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Although President Obama signed it into law in March of 2010, the Affordable Care Act remains one of the nation’s most divisive issues. Over the past nearly four years, House Republicans  have voted 40 times to repeal the law in part or in whole. Just this week, Senator Ted Cruz spent hours on the Senate floor speaking against the healthcare law, while President Obama took the stage at the Clinton Global Initiative to explain intricacies of the healthcare overhaul. So, how has it come to this point? Why does healthcare remain such a contested issue nearly 6 years into Barack Obama’s presidency?  To shed light on the evolving public debate surrounding healthcare, Intelligence Squared US is recapping a debate it held in 2011, just 9 months after the Affordable Care Act was signed into law. The controversial motion up for debate was: "Repeal Obamacare."</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Although President Obama signed it into law in March of 2010, the Affordable Care Act remains one of the nation’s most divisive issues. Over the past nearly four years, House Republicans  have voted 40 times to repeal the law in part or in whole. Just this week, Senator Ted Cruz spent hours on the Senate floor speaking against the healthcare law, while President Obama took the stage at the Clinton Global Initiative to explain intricacies of the healthcare overhaul. So, how has it come to this point? Why does healthcare remain such a contested issue nearly 6 years into Barack Obama’s presidency?  To shed light on the evolving public debate surrounding healthcare, Intelligence Squared US is recapping a debate it held in 2011, just 9 months after the Affordable Care Act was signed into law. The controversial motion up for debate was: "Repeal Obamacare."</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is The U.S. Drone Program Fatally Flawed?</title>
			<itunes:title>Is The U.S. Drone Program Fatally Flawed?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 13:50:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/4eb47205c8c4ca006ebeae8bf34dbde8/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">4eb47205c8c4ca006ebeae8bf34dbde8</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529ad</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529ad</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zyxETguUDlxfzSIwp82D5Zar9FRXJjKcsdQT5TIQjB9o3JwVTPAr60/yvUZl/tXrQQw0edv38qbUliCNnxMsS/g==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Remotely piloted aircraft, or drones, have been the centerpiece of America’s counterterrorism toolkit since the start of the Obama presidency, and the benefits have been clear.  Their use has significantly weakened al Qaeda and the Taliban...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Remotely piloted aircraft, or drones, have been the centerpiece of America’s counterterrorism toolkit since the start of the Obama presidency, and the benefits have been clear.  Their use has significantly weakened al Qaeda and the Taliban while keeping American troops out of harm’s way.  But critics of drone strikes argue that the short-term gains do not outweigh the long-term consequences—among them, radicalization of a public outraged over civilian deaths.  Is our drone program hurting, or helping, in the fight against terrorism?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Remotely piloted aircraft, or drones, have been the centerpiece of America’s counterterrorism toolkit since the start of the Obama presidency, and the benefits have been clear.  Their use has significantly weakened al Qaeda and the Taliban while keeping American troops out of harm’s way.  But critics of drone strikes argue that the short-term gains do not outweigh the long-term consequences—among them, radicalization of a public outraged over civilian deaths.  Is our drone program hurting, or helping, in the fight against terrorism?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Does The U.S. Have A Dog In The Fight In Syria?</title>
			<itunes:title>Does The U.S. Have A Dog In The Fight In Syria?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:30:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/718c2cb96a1269688cb4938dbbbcd52b/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">718c2cb96a1269688cb4938dbbbcd52b</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529ae</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529ae</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zrGc7HT6P4LboCHWQoy1Q0rMj6WFWTod6C2SkWvPWyoDwPwqdPhe0YqDxEiwZtOweXSDNlF+1tEeIcI4agtGp0Q==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Is there a clear course of action the U.S. could take to help the Syrian people that would lead to a better outcome for the country? Or is greater U.S. involvement likely to do little good in the end? The question has taken on a new sense of urgency...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Is there a clear course of action the U.S. could take to help the Syrian people that would lead to a better outcome for the country? Or is greater U.S. involvement likely to do little good in the end? The question has taken on a new sense of urgency following a recent attack near the Syrian capital Damascus that left hundreds dead. The Syrian opposition says it was a chemical weapons attack by the Syrian government, a charge the government denies. The Obama administration is now weighing possible responses. A group of experts took on the Syria question Aug. 9 in an Oxford-style debate for Intelligence Squared U.S., in partnership with the Aspen Strategy Group. They argued two against two on the motion: "The U.S. Has No Dog In The Fight In Syria."</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Is there a clear course of action the U.S. could take to help the Syrian people that would lead to a better outcome for the country? Or is greater U.S. involvement likely to do little good in the end? The question has taken on a new sense of urgency following a recent attack near the Syrian capital Damascus that left hundreds dead. The Syrian opposition says it was a chemical weapons attack by the Syrian government, a charge the government denies. The Obama administration is now weighing possible responses. A group of experts took on the Syria question Aug. 9 in an Oxford-style debate for Intelligence Squared U.S., in partnership with the Aspen Strategy Group. They argued two against two on the motion: "The U.S. Has No Dog In The Fight In Syria."</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is Cutting The Pentagon's Budget A Gift To Our Enemies?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Is Cutting The Pentagon's Budget A Gift To Our Enemies?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/fe5e1456fbb200ebfd66ab65bfb98ba2/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">fe5e1456fbb200ebfd66ab65bfb98ba2</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529af</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529af</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zsXqpipkZC73Y/KYvrotsTSrkNBKYIfpm0ZSbdVuH2JwUIY+u58lAamCIIIPpF1M0B9QNJ13iQOVTISMlaMA+9Q==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Political gridlock in Washington triggered across-the-board spending cuts, known as the sequester, in March. As a result, the Pentagon was given six months to eliminate $41 billion from the current year’s budget, and unlike past cuts, this time...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Political gridlock in Washington triggered across-the-board spending cuts, known as the sequester, in March. As a result, the Pentagon was given six months to eliminate $41 billion from the current year’s budget, and unlike past cuts, this time everything is on the table. In 2011, America spent $711 billion dollars on its defense—more than the next 13 highest spending countries combined. But the burdens it shoulders, both at home and abroad, are unprecedented. Could the sequester be a rare opportunity to overhaul the armed forces, or will its impact damage military readiness and endanger national security?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Political gridlock in Washington triggered across-the-board spending cuts, known as the sequester, in March. As a result, the Pentagon was given six months to eliminate $41 billion from the current year’s budget, and unlike past cuts, this time everything is on the table. In 2011, America spent $711 billion dollars on its defense—more than the next 13 highest spending countries combined. But the burdens it shoulders, both at home and abroad, are unprecedented. Could the sequester be a rare opportunity to overhaul the armed forces, or will its impact damage military readiness and endanger national security?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The FDA's Caution Is Hazardous To Our Health]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[The FDA's Caution Is Hazardous To Our Health]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 14:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/25b7785c22fdae6647b50da6614a85c0/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">25b7785c22fdae6647b50da6614a85c0</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529b0</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529b0</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z2oMFi5LUyivacIu4MG6gpDv7cvFy04dOtfXQceoz13tDD22NxOg0i9/cTyzkjQHthYCltCiseSX9rmtKfS/Tmw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>The Food and Drug Administration, the oldest comprehensive consumer protection agency in the U.S. federal government, is charged with protecting the public health.  Under this mandate, it regulates drugs and medical devices for their safety and...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The Food and Drug Administration, the oldest comprehensive consumer protection agency in the U.S. federal government, is charged with protecting the public health.  Under this mandate, it regulates drugs and medical devices for their safety and effectiveness.  But is it a failing mandate?  It’s long been argued that the FDA’s long and costly approval processes stifle innovation and keep life-changing treatments from the market.  But the question remains: when it comes to public health, is it ever okay to sacrifice safety for speed?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The Food and Drug Administration, the oldest comprehensive consumer protection agency in the U.S. federal government, is charged with protecting the public health.  Under this mandate, it regulates drugs and medical devices for their safety and effectiveness.  But is it a failing mandate?  It’s long been argued that the FDA’s long and costly approval processes stifle innovation and keep life-changing treatments from the market.  But the question remains: when it comes to public health, is it ever okay to sacrifice safety for speed?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The GOP Must Seize The Center Or Die</title>
			<itunes:title>The GOP Must Seize The Center Or Die</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/bcfc568b09296dc0afc5216b9df04c2d/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">bcfc568b09296dc0afc5216b9df04c2d</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529b1</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529b1</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zKlcTEaK70sWYgtUAwhgT0P6ECPSyo/F9JYFkjwpo0cxUQNZr7M1DFfuue/AGg6j+q5WmKjfJE+ulUPaBmfR3CQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>2012 was a disappointing year for Republicans. The failure to win key swing states in the presidential election and surprising losses in the House and Senate have prompted some reflection. Was their embrace of small government, low taxes, and a strong...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>2012 was a disappointing year for Republicans. The failure to win key swing states in the presidential election and surprising losses in the House and Senate have prompted some reflection. Was their embrace of small government, low taxes, and a strong conservative stance on social issues at odds with shifting American demographics? Or did the GOP embrace the right platform, but the wrong candidates?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>2012 was a disappointing year for Republicans. The failure to win key swing states in the presidential election and surprising losses in the House and Senate have prompted some reflection. Was their embrace of small government, low taxes, and a strong conservative stance on social issues at odds with shifting American demographics? Or did the GOP embrace the right platform, but the wrong candidates?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Should The U.S. Abolish The Minimum Wage?</title>
			<itunes:title>Should The U.S. Abolish The Minimum Wage?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/4201e104322a0b6936916ccb929f361b/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">4201e104322a0b6936916ccb929f361b</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529b2</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529b2</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zEOTPPUYjP2alT5wJrLI1zkWt7bOcTniDxjPK3nOO52nnoH5Fv8OtV8SR4SX2vRQ6bqZXjnh3N//wGw4r7KxhUA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>The first attempt at establishing a national minimum wage, a part of 1933’s sweeping National Industrial Recovery Act, was struck down by the Supreme Court in 1935. But in 1938, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, President Franklin D. Roosevelt...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The first attempt at establishing a national minimum wage, a part of 1933’s sweeping National Industrial Recovery Act, was struck down by the Supreme Court in 1935. But in 1938, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed into law a minimum hourly wage of 25 cents—$4.07 in today’s dollars. Three-quarters of a century later, we are still debating the merits of this cornerstone of the New Deal. Do we need government to ensure a decent paycheck, or would low-wage workers and the economy be better off without its intervention?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The first attempt at establishing a national minimum wage, a part of 1933’s sweeping National Industrial Recovery Act, was struck down by the Supreme Court in 1935. But in 1938, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed into law a minimum hourly wage of 25 cents—$4.07 in today’s dollars. Three-quarters of a century later, we are still debating the merits of this cornerstone of the New Deal. Do we need government to ensure a decent paycheck, or would low-wage workers and the economy be better off without its intervention?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Does America Need A Strong Dollar Policy?</title>
			<itunes:title>Does America Need A Strong Dollar Policy?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:32:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:49</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/c6aa41729c3d86bdd0b85422ed6a75a4/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c6aa41729c3d86bdd0b85422ed6a75a4</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529b3</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529b3</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9ztCJR6k/+iOOMt8LM+bR6sZf8EnzCuLSFIvOkemeo4v+VNmX++QTKQaJljkgnYIklSVjhO7S/d3z8l2b+buwJTw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>It’s often taken for granted that America needs a strong dollar.  When the value of the U.S. dollar is strong relative to other currencies, it becomes attractive to investors and allows Americans to buy foreign goods and services...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It’s often taken for granted that America needs a strong dollar.  When the value of the U.S. dollar is strong relative to other currencies, it becomes attractive to investors and allows Americans to buy foreign goods and services cheaply.  But in times of recession, are we better off with a weak dollar that stimulates U.S. manufacturing by making our goods cheaper and more competitive?  Or will the loss of purchasing power and currency manipulation abroad, offset the potential gains?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>It’s often taken for granted that America needs a strong dollar.  When the value of the U.S. dollar is strong relative to other currencies, it becomes attractive to investors and allows Americans to buy foreign goods and services cheaply.  But in times of recession, are we better off with a weak dollar that stimulates U.S. manufacturing by making our goods cheaper and more competitive?  Or will the loss of purchasing power and currency manipulation abroad, offset the potential gains?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Should We Prohibit Genetically Enginereed Babies?</title>
			<itunes:title>Should We Prohibit Genetically Enginereed Babies?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:26:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/e6e3e574e64301baa70610a67ac3a13d/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">e6e3e574e64301baa70610a67ac3a13d</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529b4</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529b4</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zFBfDvRgABdsBcTRyL5jMIqgR2qp4X9y7HOWVbkQx/V5iM8+GOlXhl8Xy4IsDI+PsRdfPaX5m5LILR0Es6ZCCHg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Imagine a world free of genetic diseases, where parents control their offspring’s height, eye color and intelligence.  The science may be closer than you think.  Genes interact in ways that we don’t fully understand and there...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a world free of genetic diseases, where parents control their offspring’s height, eye color and intelligence.  The science may be closer than you think.  Genes interact in ways that we don’t fully understand and there could be unintended consequences, new diseases that result from our tinkering.  But even if the science could be perfected, is it morally wrong?  Would it lead to eugenics and a stratified society where only the rich enjoy the benefits of genetic enhancement?  Or would the real injustice be depriving our children of every scientifically possible opportunity?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a world free of genetic diseases, where parents control their offspring’s height, eye color and intelligence.  The science may be closer than you think.  Genes interact in ways that we don’t fully understand and there could be unintended consequences, new diseases that result from our tinkering.  But even if the science could be perfected, is it morally wrong?  Would it lead to eugenics and a stratified society where only the rich enjoy the benefits of genetic enhancement?  Or would the real injustice be depriving our children of every scientifically possible opportunity?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Can Israel Live With A Nuclear Iran?</title>
			<itunes:title>Can Israel Live With A Nuclear Iran?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:26:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/0ddfd97a29290ceff14f6f64e3d97fa2/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">0ddfd97a29290ceff14f6f64e3d97fa2</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529b5</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529b5</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zpyjjcs7AlpapRZLtaFB6tt7KjCnXdtNXTLsU1nkUKPuKW25IAfzOYGdu7e4FdJNd6EC+qxT5oCJdiMuHKzfMTg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Over the summer of 2012, despite increased international pressure and economic sanctions, Iran doubled the number of nuclear centrifuges installed in its underground Fordow site, stopping just short of the capacity to produce nuclear fuel.  ...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the summer of 2012, despite increased international pressure and economic sanctions, Iran doubled the number of nuclear centrifuges installed in its underground Fordow site, stopping just short of the capacity to produce nuclear fuel.   President Obama has rejected Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s call to draw a “red line” that would trigger U.S. military action.  But what would the costs and benefits of military action be?  Can Israel live with a nuclear Iran, or could the time be near for a pre-emptive strike?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Over the summer of 2012, despite increased international pressure and economic sanctions, Iran doubled the number of nuclear centrifuges installed in its underground Fordow site, stopping just short of the capacity to produce nuclear fuel.   President Obama has rejected Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s call to draw a “red line” that would trigger U.S. military action.  But what would the costs and benefits of military action be?  Can Israel live with a nuclear Iran, or could the time be near for a pre-emptive strike?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Science Refutes God</title>
			<itunes:title>Science Refutes God</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/ed5233c25679969443c67b725877ad85/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">ed5233c25679969443c67b725877ad85</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529b6</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529b6</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zKYize6PpSe32nGDf4Kvx8tUG4HwlXPf8YbAFyvJi9B6Eo5lN7uH11RRVEwPVo9aVrNANa6c4hsHBe6zFXJE7qw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Can science and religion co-exist?</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>On the fundamental question--evolution or creation?--Americans are on the fence. According to one survey, while 61% of Americans believe we have evolved over time, 22% believe this evolution was guided by a higher power, with another 31% on the side of creationism. For some, modern science debunks many of religion's core beliefs, but for others, questions like "Why are we here?" and "How did it all come about?" can only be answered through a belief in the existence of God. Can science and religion co-exist?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>On the fundamental question--evolution or creation?--Americans are on the fence. According to one survey, while 61% of Americans believe we have evolved over time, 22% believe this evolution was guided by a higher power, with another 31% on the side of creationism. For some, modern science debunks many of religion's core beliefs, but for others, questions like "Why are we here?" and "How did it all come about?" can only be answered through a belief in the existence of God. Can science and religion co-exist?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Legalize Drugs</title>
			<itunes:title>Legalize Drugs</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 17:04:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/1b83b5f25dc408b0d14366e4d2a7dfbb/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1b83b5f25dc408b0d14366e4d2a7dfbb</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529b7</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529b7</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z3VW4Ae1LRrZaFfBTXiVmPjo/SYXoNA/ZhGLyPs24zDv3cy1u907aJVgj//pSdvqovlLbIg4do3g4wwFRFo5kkg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[It was 1971 when President Richard Nixon declared a "war on drugs." $2.5 trillion dollars later, drug use is half of what it was 30 years ago, and thousands of offenders are successfully diverted to treatment instead of jail. And yet, 22 million...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It was 1971 when President Richard Nixon declared a "war on drugs." $2.5 trillion dollars later, drug use is half of what it was 30 years ago, and thousands of offenders are successfully diverted to treatment instead of jail. And yet, 22 million Americans-9% of the population-still uses illegal drugs, and with the highest incarceration rate in the world, we continue to fill our prisons with drug offenders. Decimated families and communities are left in the wake. Is it time to legalize drugs or is this a war that we're winning?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>It was 1971 when President Richard Nixon declared a "war on drugs." $2.5 trillion dollars later, drug use is half of what it was 30 years ago, and thousands of offenders are successfully diverted to treatment instead of jail. And yet, 22 million Americans-9% of the population-still uses illegal drugs, and with the highest incarceration rate in the world, we continue to fill our prisons with drug offenders. Decimated families and communities are left in the wake. Is it time to legalize drugs or is this a war that we're winning?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Are The Rich Taxed Enough?</title>
			<itunes:title>Are The Rich Taxed Enough?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:41:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/2f7a8b9e9ef3abc2c96a3aec1b76b406/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2f7a8b9e9ef3abc2c96a3aec1b76b406</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529b8</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529b8</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zlNrkJbWeMICsLFy2ovBH6YGZn28XbNhW7GLAWH/EyLc0xZeIESG9A8n/v0IPzqGL3OGdRGNMFwZ9eIBsjOrd2A==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[How can America's economy recover? By taxing the 1% or extending tax cuts to all?]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>How do we fix the economy? The U.S. government's budget deficit is nearing a trillion dollars for the fourth straight year and unemployment remains high. With the Bush-era tax cuts set to expire at the end of 2012, what is the best move for continued economic recovery? Are the nation's wealthiest paying their fair share, or should tax cuts be extended to everyone in the name of job creation? Debaters include Romney's economic supervisor, Glenn Hubbard, economist Arthur Laffer, former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich and economist Mark Zandi.  </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>How do we fix the economy? The U.S. government's budget deficit is nearing a trillion dollars for the fourth straight year and unemployment remains high. With the Bush-era tax cuts set to expire at the end of 2012, what is the best move for continued economic recovery? Are the nation's wealthiest paying their fair share, or should tax cuts be extended to everyone in the name of job creation? Debaters include Romney's economic supervisor, Glenn Hubbard, economist Arthur Laffer, former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich and economist Mark Zandi.  </p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Should The Government Ration End Of Life Care?</title>
			<itunes:title>Should The Government Ration End Of Life Care?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:31</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/c4170f90dd7738663a00bd28a032c5fa/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c4170f90dd7738663a00bd28a032c5fa</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529b9</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529b9</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zYwR20RbKVUPDtt7sO4jsM2prDFhthmEiA/60004hh0Z1Uz1x0s8rSAN3N6lETqVD195d22qfF0bQOadQTqzR4w==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Just because we can extend life, should we? Two teams of debaters are arguing for and against this motion. The U.S. is expected to spend $2.8 trillion on health care in 2012. If health care is a scarce resource, limited by its availability and our...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Just because we can extend life, should we? Two teams of debaters are arguing for and against this motion. The U.S. is expected to spend $2.8 trillion on health care in 2012. If health care is a scarce resource, limited by its availability and our ability to pay for it, should government step in to ration care? In other words, how much is an extra month of life worth?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Just because we can extend life, should we? Two teams of debaters are arguing for and against this motion. The U.S. is expected to spend $2.8 trillion on health care in 2012. If health care is a scarce resource, limited by its availability and our ability to pay for it, should government step in to ration care? In other words, how much is an extra month of life worth?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Are Elected Islamists Better Than Dictators?</title>
			<itunes:title>Are Elected Islamists Better Than Dictators?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/f1f3d71501df792b7eb08f7e95cace27/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">f1f3d71501df792b7eb08f7e95cace27</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529ba</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529ba</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zSlaqsPrUdtTyT/OPM8OcFpYfLIrtIZAONsc4/7n+7ZCHZnmSAzSuQm+k5nbNjYJwr6bEuy+c5K8a8vpSaf2M4w==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Reuel Marc Gerecht, Brian Katulis, Daniel Pipes and Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser debate the motion: "Better elected Islamists than dictators."]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The popular uprisings of the Arab Spring have left a leadership void that Islamist parties have been quick to fill. A longtime supporter of former strongmen like Egypt's Mubarak and Tunisia's Ben Ali, the U.S. now faces the uncomfortable result of Arab democracy - the rise of Islamist parties that are less amenable to the West than their autocratic predecessors. Will the Islamists, who once embraced violence, slowly liberalize as they face the difficulties of state leadership? Or will it mean the growth of anti-Americanism and radicalization in the region? Reuel Marc Gerecht, Brian Katulis, Daniel Pipes and Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser debate the motion: "Better elected Islamists than dictators." Debate moderated by author and ABC News correspondent John Donvan.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The popular uprisings of the Arab Spring have left a leadership void that Islamist parties have been quick to fill. A longtime supporter of former strongmen like Egypt's Mubarak and Tunisia's Ben Ali, the U.S. now faces the uncomfortable result of Arab democracy - the rise of Islamist parties that are less amenable to the West than their autocratic predecessors. Will the Islamists, who once embraced violence, slowly liberalize as they face the difficulties of state leadership? Or will it mean the growth of anti-Americanism and radicalization in the region? Reuel Marc Gerecht, Brian Katulis, Daniel Pipes and Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser debate the motion: "Better elected Islamists than dictators." Debate moderated by author and ABC News correspondent John Donvan.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Are Super PACs Good For Democracy?</title>
			<itunes:title>Are Super PACs Good For Democracy?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 17:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/926f409d0565fba263ec149d7fc3a9fb/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">926f409d0565fba263ec149d7fc3a9fb</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529bb</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529bb</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zb90DPGT/RHFW85Otb8EpjunbIhiVHmBY63kc08snxKQwlxukOqjBYJEQtmnuhTlo1fqhPaWoMrnXKBncKDgLgg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[It's free speech versus possible corruption in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Money has been flowing through this election season like never before. Some say unfettered political spending is a necessary part of free speech; others argue that approach drowns out many voices. A panel of experts takes on the topic for Intelligence Squared U.S.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Money has been flowing through this election season like never before. Some say unfettered political spending is a necessary part of free speech; others argue that approach drowns out many voices. A panel of experts takes on the topic for Intelligence Squared U.S.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Natural Gas Boom: Doing More Harm Than Good?</title>
			<itunes:title>The Natural Gas Boom: Doing More Harm Than Good?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 21:01:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/d834cf1162ffdda41456677780f9364e/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">d834cf1162ffdda41456677780f9364e</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529bc</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529bc</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zUsU8IzmTUbNpjaK5r/G/Lmpsuwdgcv906SRXRrylWydaBDDRAH3n1j3LTDMj9I+w+M/kOcBkprRflHtRiDkaCQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Some people are embracing the wave of increased natural gas extraction in the United States. Others, concerned about the risks, are saying no fracking way. A panel of experts weighs the pros and cons of a boom sparked by hydraulic fracturing in the...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Some people are embracing the wave of increased natural gas extraction in the United States. Others, concerned about the risks, are saying no fracking way. A panel of experts weighs the pros and cons of a boom sparked by hydraulic fracturing in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Some people are embracing the wave of increased natural gas extraction in the United States. Others, concerned about the risks, are saying no fracking way. A panel of experts weighs the pros and cons of a boom sparked by hydraulic fracturing in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Should College Football Be Banned?</title>
			<itunes:title>Should College Football Be Banned?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/c3875ec6255a4437cfe922f0d367d9d9/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c3875ec6255a4437cfe922f0d367d9d9</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529bd</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529bd</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zhdgLFcQawt6TRmSuR0NdZxtHynPvtgDwMWHbd7VHYtPlroz4ZYDk4P6u8xPvAvd0E8mLdXnmps3Sqw9rNzfCpA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>In recent years, college football programs have been hit by a series of scandals. And observers have long raised questions about the risks of head injuries. A panel of experts looks at the state of college football in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, college football programs have been hit by a series of scandals. And observers have long raised questions about the risks of head injuries. A panel of experts looks at the state of college football in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, college football programs have been hit by a series of scandals. And observers have long raised questions about the risks of head injuries. A panel of experts looks at the state of college football in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is The Internet Closing Our Minds Politically?</title>
			<itunes:title>Is The Internet Closing Our Minds Politically?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:12:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/0e021d6bccc640618144af8fa5cd6d9e/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">0e021d6bccc640618144af8fa5cd6d9e</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529be</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529be</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z5Z3C2MMcPecYcA4e2NEaYNTZLuTAe+uFoWyv4G2E5BscV14Z4SWlh00R206LRN/7gKK6Z3Ea0wMlnFq8RNPbuQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[On the Internet, it's easy to find like-minded people and to frequent sites where you agree with the content. And algorithms are serving up more personalized search content. Are we running the risk of getting trapped in information bubbles? A panel of...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>On the Internet, it's easy to find like-minded people and to frequent sites where you agree with the content. And algorithms are serving up more personalized search content. Are we running the risk of getting trapped in information bubbles? A panel of experts debates for Intelligence Squared U.S.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>On the Internet, it's easy to find like-minded people and to frequent sites where you agree with the content. And algorithms are serving up more personalized search content. Are we running the risk of getting trapped in information bubbles? A panel of experts debates for Intelligence Squared U.S.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Does China Do Capitalism Better Than America?</title>
			<itunes:title>Does China Do Capitalism Better Than America?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:14:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/9cd583c2c53396c64fc4ff78b5ac1b7b/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">9cd583c2c53396c64fc4ff78b5ac1b7b</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529bf</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529bf</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zbFO3A9vVEVRBQ8B4C6SirvsRKJs9DECCCkt9uBEAX1hRqyGr7bQi52hG2pInXAOWLfF1E8qLwjuMDCNZgxJQJw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>As China experiments with its own form of state-run capitalism, the country has managed to maintain a strong economy while many Western countries are faltering. A team of experts faces off in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate on the motion,...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As China experiments with its own form of state-run capitalism, the country has managed to maintain a strong economy while many Western countries are faltering. A team of experts faces off in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate on the motion, "China Does Capitalism Better Than America."</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>As China experiments with its own form of state-run capitalism, the country has managed to maintain a strong economy while many Western countries are faltering. A team of experts faces off in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate on the motion, "China Does Capitalism Better Than America."</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is Obesity The Government's Business?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Is Obesity The Government's Business?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/8c35893318d26db6cc28df0eddffb939/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8c35893318d26db6cc28df0eddffb939</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529c0</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529c0</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z2Tyb9CEkBxNasOM6kts9OxpxTJcOmAnnVwgvJTo/iED6g28dd/kWMGjajjGk9jLp+56uHcpN6LJLr7HUlX3i7Q==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In the U.S., more than 78 million adults and 12 million children are obese, prompting some to argue that it's in the government's interest to combat the problem. But others say the government should stay away from people's personal habits. A group of...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In the U.S., more than 78 million adults and 12 million children are obese, prompting some to argue that it's in the government's interest to combat the problem. But others say the government should stay away from people's personal habits. A group of experts takes on the topic in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>In the U.S., more than 78 million adults and 12 million children are obese, prompting some to argue that it's in the government's interest to combat the problem. But others say the government should stay away from people's personal habits. A group of experts takes on the topic in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Should The U.N. Grant Palestine Full Membership?</title>
			<itunes:title>Should The U.N. Grant Palestine Full Membership?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:50:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/7fc93966f88a2869cf3531d22415dbab/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7fc93966f88a2869cf3531d22415dbab</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529c1</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529c1</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z+yfLTKbf2wXhNVDzO15lxrST2wOdjzyNUYibGVHKHk8t/y0r1XHjXJN88loSsBELR/rtfaF8kCkFg1bfQZUctw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In the Intelligence Squared U.S. debate held Jan. 10, four experts on the Middle East face off on the motion "The U.N. Should Admit Palestine As A Full Member State." Could this approach help resolve or exacerbate the long-standing conflict between...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In the Intelligence Squared U.S. debate held Jan. 10, four experts on the Middle East face off on the motion "The U.N. Should Admit Palestine As A Full Member State." Could this approach help resolve or exacerbate the long-standing conflict between Israel and Palestine?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>In the Intelligence Squared U.S. debate held Jan. 10, four experts on the Middle East face off on the motion "The U.N. Should Admit Palestine As A Full Member State." Could this approach help resolve or exacerbate the long-standing conflict between Israel and Palestine?</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Would The World Be Better Off Without Religion?</title>
			<itunes:title>Would The World Be Better Off Without Religion?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:47:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/a4c4e32bc420a9c8e84d7ee175231d5c/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">a4c4e32bc420a9c8e84d7ee175231d5c</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529c2</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529c2</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z7wlyhojaJPQxwXSThnhLT8sYjM6d+b2DwZqFzWnSuULyjtBS2oVwmFg11W9vm8+kp5SbmggqbQYC9j2FPgoLKw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>A rabbi, a descendant of Charles Darwin, a philosopher and a scholar face off over religion in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A rabbi, a descendant of Charles Darwin, a philosopher and a scholar face off over religion in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>A rabbi, a descendant of Charles Darwin, a philosopher and a scholar face off over religion in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Should Congress Pass Obama's Jobs Bill In Pieces?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Should Congress Pass Obama's Jobs Bill In Pieces?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:44:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/6fa52e93c87a174c0f56081f14f1438b/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6fa52e93c87a174c0f56081f14f1438b</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529c3</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529c3</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zsXqTUe49GiWFrAI69FCtfTEMPWZLIWT4QHUvZp7HlGGhnEAAB978YcCKJe9rgCXqcmlsps4yS9yDFY56YwRykQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Supporters say if lawmakers do nothing, the U.S. economy may fall into another recession. But critics say the jobs package just recycles policies that have failed in the past. A group of experts argue the merits of the president's proposals in the...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Supporters say if lawmakers do nothing, the U.S. economy may fall into another recession. But critics say the jobs package just recycles policies that have failed in the past. A group of experts argue the merits of the president's proposals in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Supporters say if lawmakers do nothing, the U.S. economy may fall into another recession. But critics say the jobs package just recycles policies that have failed in the past. A group of experts argue the merits of the president's proposals in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Do Too Many Kids Go To College?</title>
			<itunes:title>Do Too Many Kids Go To College?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:43:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/d17b50201ed4397336674e9393788f08/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">d17b50201ed4397336674e9393788f08</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529c4</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529c4</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zfnxZCkPr2BL0nPcQ334RaRpUCYAUOYc4n56THX+IcdXEU23eHaQhwDWxhY04eswhuN6gdlokrZasCn2lNrQ0Kw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Getting a college degree is often touted as a way to increase your income and your ability to compete in the job market. But are too many unprepared students being pushed into taking on large amounts of debt? A team of experts faces off in the latest...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Getting a college degree is often touted as a way to increase your income and your ability to compete in the job market. But are too many unprepared students being pushed into taking on large amounts of debt? A team of experts faces off in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Getting a college degree is often touted as a way to increase your income and your ability to compete in the job market. But are too many unprepared students being pushed into taking on large amounts of debt? A team of experts faces off in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Do Grandma's Benefits Imperil Junior's Future?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Do Grandma's Benefits Imperil Junior's Future?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:06:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/d632761a23e601f6ca506d9ea10cd346/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">d632761a23e601f6ca506d9ea10cd346</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529c5</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529c5</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zWOwiRE+a8V6sjoEcwvHMkNMO4AWAgNX5Kvdn2PBFcxnugTEKSNRkq3S3R2oaMIUCfwK7Q/UfPmfk/N4HqD1Jcg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The debate over entitlement programs has a generational component that can't be overlooked: Is helping seniors make ends meet only generating mountains of debt that will hamper future generations? A team of experts chewed over that topic in the latest...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The debate over entitlement programs has a generational component that can't be overlooked: Is helping seniors make ends meet only generating mountains of debt that will hamper future generations? A team of experts chewed over that topic in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The debate over entitlement programs has a generational component that can't be overlooked: Is helping seniors make ends meet only generating mountains of debt that will hamper future generations? A team of experts chewed over that topic in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Are Men Finished?</title>
			<itunes:title>Are Men Finished?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:31:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:29</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/c267b351f471db36a05dc086492dba14/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c267b351f471db36a05dc086492dba14</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529c6</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529c6</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zpfI5Jcv85IFFlzD/lbYPkUzaSgaqB3CT7quaiCX2Kdh5YUM1ovJGFKNw+wC0R6OKnP68a4STnJan022GyfztJQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Last year, women made up the majority of the U.S. workforce for the first time ever. There are more women earning college degrees than men. Are women taking over the position of power in society, or are things just balancing out after years of male...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Last year, women made up the majority of the U.S. workforce for the first time ever. There are more women earning college degrees than men. Are women taking over the position of power in society, or are things just balancing out after years of male domination? A panel of experts debates.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Last year, women made up the majority of the U.S. workforce for the first time ever. There are more women earning college degrees than men. Are women taking over the position of power in society, or are things just balancing out after years of male domination? A panel of experts debates.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is It Time To End The War On Terror?</title>
			<itunes:title>Is It Time To End The War On Terror?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:45:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:19</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/9be965f2df4d158bb9b1cabaa1dae022/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">9be965f2df4d158bb9b1cabaa1dae022</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529c7</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529c7</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z90RSbIxXlYYm6YkvsB8gBoC98WifYC2f3kFFSmCt8j6orq7XxZRrOA5DhzURrCEH7k0nS9j89YvSddQOqWDPsw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Ten years after the Sept. 11 attacks and months after the death of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, is it time to move on? Or is it important to maintain the open-ended conflict? Experts take on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ten years after the Sept. 11 attacks and months after the death of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, is it time to move on? Or is it important to maintain the open-ended conflict? Experts take on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Ten years after the Sept. 11 attacks and months after the death of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, is it time to move on? Or is it important to maintain the open-ended conflict? Experts take on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Does Freedom Of The Press Extend To State Secrets?</title>
			<itunes:title>Does Freedom Of The Press Extend To State Secrets?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:56:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:29</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/d25be3720a38e8534c00f4558291f82a/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">d25be3720a38e8534c00f4558291f82a</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529c8</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529c8</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zdWV3EyKkcvcGvbeqNFxiHyKRqFiLeiQVa5/ZA33j4fHbf0kBTBup0Ul/T5vI9RWlge9ujtHofpjaUBUutrr9nA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Does the public's right to know interfere with the government's ability to protect citizens? Four experts go head to head on the issue in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Does the public's right to know interfere with the government's ability to protect citizens? Four experts go head to head on the issue in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Does the public's right to know interfere with the government's ability to protect citizens? Four experts go head to head on the issue in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Should We Stop Taking The World's Huddled Masses?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Should We Stop Taking The World's Huddled Masses?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 17:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20110509_specials_iq2edit.mp3%2323892/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20110509_specials_iq2edit.mp3#23892</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529c9</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529c9</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z3zWfZLy3XLF2GnYARu62DXdSL70bGfWZOoGLONo7t2yTB1RIgUjpFQTFVcCeyP+Ik7Y9OTnruZ7htpjoKUthjQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The U.S. is often referred to as a nation built by immigrants. But in recent years, the debate over the country's immigration laws has reached a boiling point. Do immigrants help the economy? Or do they take jobs away from Americans? Four experts...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. is often referred to as a nation built by immigrants. But in recent years, the debate over the country's immigration laws has reached a boiling point. Do immigrants help the economy? Or do they take jobs away from Americans? Four experts recently went head to head on the issue in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. is often referred to as a nation built by immigrants. But in recent years, the debate over the country's immigration laws has reached a boiling point. Do immigrants help the economy? Or do they take jobs away from Americans? Four experts recently went head to head on the issue in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is It Time To Clip America's Global Wings?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Is It Time To Clip America's Global Wings?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20110411_specials_iq2edit.mp3%2323530/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20110411_specials_iq2edit.mp3#23530</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529ca</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529ca</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z09t0lbg0t946ZN96P6Vb+juGg1FtL0SsrjTOWObQqdo5ImyRyUxnlrkYkqsLUmst/C7v3vI95LzqLF/eqkOAfg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[As the United States grapples with a struggling economy and continuing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, some argue that it's time to scale back its role in the world. A team of experts discusses the pros and cons of this proposition in the latest...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As the United States grapples with a struggling economy and continuing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, some argue that it's time to scale back its role in the world. A team of experts discusses the pros and cons of this proposition in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>As the United States grapples with a struggling economy and continuing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, some argue that it's time to scale back its role in the world. A team of experts discusses the pros and cons of this proposition in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Can Clean Energy Drive The Economic Recovery?</title>
			<itunes:title>Can Clean Energy Drive The Economic Recovery?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20110314_specials_iq2edit.mp3%2323107/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20110314_specials_iq2edit.mp3#23107</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529cb</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529cb</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zSp7fmEJ3RPtcmwSWdMnsxzTKhj2N2nPwcGTYi5EpUrmFsHIW2BSB78sm09XikWrwXTTAWLzX6R+4nC41dcL/Xg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>President Obama and other leaders have called for investment in cleaner energy sources as a way to create jobs and spur U.S. economic recovery. But can it really work? A team of experts takes on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama and other leaders have called for investment in cleaner energy sources as a way to create jobs and spur U.S. economic recovery. But can it really work? A team of experts takes on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>President Obama and other leaders have called for investment in cleaner energy sources as a way to create jobs and spur U.S. economic recovery. But can it really work? A team of experts takes on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is The Two-Party System Making The U.S. Ungovernable?</title>
			<itunes:title>Is The Two-Party System Making The U.S. Ungovernable?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20110221_specials_iq2edit.mp3%2322816/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20110221_specials_iq2edit.mp3#22816</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529cc</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529cc</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z23PPxoaCgLKLAEw1LEe4caD6yLrhbyXoqfNatAzWpCyQBMoYq7MhRrfwPWcYZEgjT7J5GJIaU6U+uPiFgRzDrA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Some argue that Americans have been locked into evaluating every issue through a prism of left and right. A team of experts tackles the topic in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Some argue that Americans have been locked into evaluating every issue through a prism of left and right. A team of experts tackles the topic in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Some argue that Americans have been locked into evaluating every issue through a prism of left and right. A team of experts tackles the topic in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Should The Obama Health Care Law Be Repealed?</title>
			<itunes:title>Should The Obama Health Care Law Be Repealed?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20110118_specials_iq2ed.mp3%2322334/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20110118_specials_iq2ed.mp3#22334</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529cd</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529cd</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zRQz+/RKfxf9nbHypXQYuxzlmWUE0tdKb+ERPHELCqv1Gbuiu/38bJxQ7wblA6r7nMWfpyzJ7D0PI1WDAMM7yag==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>As Republicans now in control of the House move to repeal the new health care law, a team of experts takes on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As Republicans now in control of the House move to repeal the new health care law, a team of experts takes on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>As Republicans now in control of the House move to repeal the new health care law, a team of experts takes on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Should Airports Use Racial And Religious Profiling?</title>
			<itunes:title>Should Airports Use Racial And Religious Profiling?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20101129_specials_iq2ed.mp3%2321725/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20101129_specials_iq2ed.mp3#21725</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529ce</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529ce</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z7bK+JONTSJEEVWsEY/wwrGxttp6jNgI3dUza+TCPumOMI/LCSEk5XjTDhfyjjslou3vF/AdbFxABl9sJnv/bIw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>The recent furor over screenings and pat-downs has catapulted airport security back into the spotlight. Should airports be targeting their limited resources differently? A team of experts examines the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S....</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The recent furor over screenings and pat-downs has catapulted airport security back into the spotlight. Should airports be targeting their limited resources differently? A team of experts examines the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>The recent furor over screenings and pat-downs has catapulted airport security back into the spotlight. Should airports be targeting their limited resources differently? A team of experts examines the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is Afghanistan A Lost Cause?</title>
			<itunes:title>Is Afghanistan A Lost Cause?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20101116_specials_iq2ed.mp3%2321584/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20101116_specials_iq2ed.mp3#21584</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529cf</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529cf</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z+tKfprIdFKC7af9jsNAUaf57Pzne7zhn1wGtIiIyihHH9OzfM+CpZcZ4/cyUWctnP6iM7JyWvARGiN6Gz407RA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>After nearly a decade of fighting, Americans are still debating the U.S. involvement in Afghanistan, its toll on the military and its financial cost. A team of experts goes head-to-head on the topic in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>After nearly a decade of fighting, Americans are still debating the U.S. involvement in Afghanistan, its toll on the military and its financial cost. A team of experts goes head-to-head on the topic in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>After nearly a decade of fighting, Americans are still debating the U.S. involvement in Afghanistan, its toll on the military and its financial cost. A team of experts goes head-to-head on the topic in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is Big Government Stifling The American Spirit?</title>
			<itunes:title>Is Big Government Stifling The American Spirit?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20101101_specials_iq2edit.mp3%2321339/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20101101_specials_iq2edit.mp3#21339</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529d0</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529d0</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zfTZNSiNyWPp/4W3lOFyzM8Ccbs6NnN9I6YUGVWkCmNykNJ80waSotku4bdI3haKqxC/iNM9jfx5tyxu9NAdThw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[On Oct. 26, a team of experts argued the issue "Big Government is Stifling the American Spirit" during the Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>On Oct. 26, a team of experts argued the issue "Big Government is Stifling the American Spirit" during the Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>On Oct. 26, a team of experts argued the issue "Big Government is Stifling the American Spirit" during the Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is Islam A Religion Of Peace?</title>
			<itunes:title>Is Islam A Religion Of Peace?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20101013_specials_iq2ed.mp3%2321090/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20101013_specials_iq2ed.mp3#21090</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529d1</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529d1</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zRf6lpwzUV0qmmyElW++EAwznWANiWFp3bkJLaFhzt+rQV4ONUATZqwyBzpPt93iD5gIZuFlZ0HGbDXgsTnMgSw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[That's how former President George W. Bush characterized it, but some take a different view. A panel of experts takes on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That's how former President George W. Bush characterized it, but some take a different view. A panel of experts takes on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>That's how former President George W. Bush characterized it, but some take a different view. A panel of experts takes on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Are Terrorists Criminals Or Enemy Combatants?</title>
			<itunes:title>Are Terrorists Criminals Or Enemy Combatants?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20100921_specials_iq2edit.mp3%2320792/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20100921_specials_iq2edit.mp3#20792</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529d2</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529d2</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zITHbS0ztFkUH57wzX/oBOuMhzfhOU0ZJ+Durt0p7dKMO5nJtm5V9eygCAPC+MF5XPyDHYoFskr+bAHdD3ss8Qg==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Some view a law enforcement approach to terrorism as dangerous, while others argue that denying suspects the ability to defend themselves in court runs counter to American values. Four experts recently went head to head on the issue in the latest...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Some view a law enforcement approach to terrorism as dangerous, while others argue that denying suspects the ability to defend themselves in court runs counter to American values. Four experts recently went head to head on the issue in the latest debate in the Intelligence Squared U.S. series.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Some view a law enforcement approach to terrorism as dangerous, while others argue that denying suspects the ability to defend themselves in court runs counter to American values. Four experts recently went head to head on the issue in the latest debate in the Intelligence Squared U.S. series.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Has The Cyberwar Threat Been Exaggerated?</title>
			<itunes:title>Has The Cyberwar Threat Been Exaggerated?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20100615_specials_iq2ed.mp3%2319585/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20100615_specials_iq2ed.mp3#19585</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529d3</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529d3</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zC8/8OW+VeQMHf8KdQyMeMaJCl6ofvtR3FMnZo59LCTE2M3ng4dS7mqIacIbIIA8wrGVTz51fKbW6nTcwGQuJXA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>As succeeding presidential administrations and leaders in the Pentagon devote increasing resources to cybersecurity, some observers are questioning whether the threat of cyberwar has been overstated. A panel of experts debates the latest Intelligence...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As succeeding presidential administrations and leaders in the Pentagon devote increasing resources to cybersecurity, some observers are questioning whether the threat of cyberwar has been overstated. A panel of experts debates the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. topic.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>As succeeding presidential administrations and leaders in the Pentagon devote increasing resources to cybersecurity, some observers are questioning whether the threat of cyberwar has been overstated. A panel of experts debates the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. topic.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Does Obama's Foreign Policy Spell America's Decline?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Does Obama's Foreign Policy Spell America's Decline?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 19:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20100518_specials_iq2edit.mp3%2319207/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20100518_specials_iq2edit.mp3#19207</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529d4</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529d4</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zk6xsdE3js13nrBNl3jjjemwit04vPrK/5xRTFDCUAe57TECo0pA//iFFJeb7aMuN55xw7c6lskHyUPWrQqNgCw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[When it comes to foreign policy, some argue that President Obama is alienating the United States' allies as he seeks to make accommodations for nations with whom America has more uncertain relationships, such as China and Russia. And, they say, the...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to foreign policy, some argue that President Obama is alienating the United States' allies as he seeks to make accommodations for nations with whom America has more uncertain relationships, such as China and Russia. And, they say, the administration has been too weak in its policy toward Iran.  A group of experts takes on that question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to foreign policy, some argue that President Obama is alienating the United States' allies as he seeks to make accommodations for nations with whom America has more uncertain relationships, such as China and Russia. And, they say, the administration has been too weak in its policy toward Iran.  A group of experts takes on that question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is Organic Food Stuffed Full Of Marketing Hype?</title>
			<itunes:title>Is Organic Food Stuffed Full Of Marketing Hype?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 14:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20100420_specials_iq2edit.mp3%2319106/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20100420_specials_iq2edit.mp3#19106</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529d5</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529d5</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zwkVhkuaprxCw4P+sQtatCsY7SmybCwOaXUQIp2sBoYHwgRXj6LyhU2M6bBPDVIhr0fb3DX7sL1RsxcxXzY6pHA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>Is paying extra money for organic food worth it? Some argue that the label confers real value, while others claim that organic food has not been proven healthier and that it comes with its own environmental trade-offs. A panel of experts faces off on...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Is paying extra money for organic food worth it? Some argue that the label confers real value, while others claim that organic food has not been proven healthier and that it comes with its own environmental trade-offs. A panel of experts faces off on the topic in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Is paying extra money for organic food worth it? Some argue that the label confers real value, while others claim that organic food has not been proven healthier and that it comes with its own environmental trade-offs. A panel of experts faces off on the topic in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Are Teachers Unions To Blame For Failing Schools?</title>
			<itunes:title>Are Teachers Unions To Blame For Failing Schools?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20100322_specials_iq2ed.mp3%2318524/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20100322_specials_iq2ed.mp3#18524</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529d6</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529d6</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zo5YK4p4IE1279XBl/WMbJYbU93IrmU4kO1o0sItnW7Rf5aI039o7k+rQ0usswuRBTHXzOzciAuACI7ZZ8ypuKw==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In the quest to remake America's public schools, teachers unions have frequently been blasted as an obstacle to improvement. But do unions really deserve more of the blame than shrinking budgets and other problems? A group of experts takes on that...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In the quest to remake America's public schools, teachers unions have frequently been blasted as an obstacle to improvement. But do unions really deserve more of the blame than shrinking budgets and other problems? A group of experts takes on that question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>In the quest to remake America's public schools, teachers unions have frequently been blasted as an obstacle to improvement. But do unions really deserve more of the blame than shrinking budgets and other problems? A group of experts takes on that question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Should The U.S. Scale Back Relations With Israel?</title>
			<itunes:title>Should The U.S. Scale Back Relations With Israel?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20100217_specials_iq2full.mp3%2318078/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20100217_specials_iq2full.mp3#18078</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529d7</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529d7</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z1f2y/UbYfKugyU18zSfPqT9jolrqcjyphehoNpBlljk9cmnkkgsWMh8MkTMXPLfUVzzWsWaQdRmyiOgxyOx9iQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Does the United States' special relationship with Israel come at too high a cost in the Middle East? A panel of experts takes on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Does the United States' special relationship with Israel come at too high a cost in the Middle East? A panel of experts takes on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Does the United States' special relationship with Israel come at too high a cost in the Middle East? A panel of experts takes on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is California The First Failed State?</title>
			<itunes:title>Is California The First Failed State?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20100126_specials_pt123.mp3%2317815/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20100126_specials_pt123.mp3#17815</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529d8</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529d8</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9znSlnqznxrF47C8c5bhxf1BznRy7YTiOMBLAaZNSIdoXKB8ec7Ppyt8kfVhF/AUlvtkd7gURPDaUYB7bse6mZXA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>California is in the midst of a budget nightmare. Will the Golden State find a bailout, or has it become the first failed state of the union? A group of experts takes on the topic in an Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>California is in the midst of a budget nightmare. Will the Golden State find a bailout, or has it become the first failed state of the union? A group of experts takes on the topic in an Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>California is in the midst of a budget nightmare. Will the Golden State find a bailout, or has it become the first failed state of the union? A group of experts takes on the topic in an Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is America To Blame For Mexico's Drug War?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Is America To Blame For Mexico's Drug War?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20091207_specials_iq2.mp3%2317192/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20091207_specials_iq2.mp3#17192</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529d9</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529d9</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zlwi+RcmoLChiwwE2veynilMbruzc+jmoQHXKFh9W7nYRE04YomuwgMZU7VXI7jtCm3HEwB4bUVTxVP7Pj+KlLA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>In Mexico, thousands of people have died in drug-related violence in the past three years as the government has ramped up its war on drug cartels. But is the United States — with its market for illegal drugs and flow of guns south of the border —...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In Mexico, thousands of people have died in drug-related violence in the past three years as the government has ramped up its war on drug cartels. But is the United States — with its market for illegal drugs and flow of guns south of the border — to blame? A panel of experts face off on the topic in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>In Mexico, thousands of people have died in drug-related violence in the past three years as the government has ramped up its war on drug cartels. But is the United States — with its market for illegal drugs and flow of guns south of the border — to blame? A panel of experts face off on the topic in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Are Obama's Economic Policies Working Effectively?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Are Obama's Economic Policies Working Effectively?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20091123_specials_iq2ed.mp3%2317003/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20091123_specials_iq2ed.mp3#17003</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529da</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529da</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9ztCVYjSwG4P/A1ejfG5n7deTMOS6aGTtdQniMV1a0oVnwdlFzBeMWrbnmUy3t5Sko5bnU0BbN/PZJsq7pLV35og==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>As the economy slowly begins to recover from the financial meltdown, should the Obama administration get credit for turning things around? Or has the administration failed to do what it takes to really help the economy? A panel of experts takes on the...</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As the economy slowly begins to recover from the financial meltdown, should the Obama administration get credit for turning things around? Or has the administration failed to do what it takes to really help the economy? A panel of experts takes on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>As the economy slowly begins to recover from the financial meltdown, should the Obama administration get credit for turning things around? Or has the administration failed to do what it takes to really help the economy? A panel of experts takes on the question in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Good Riddance To Mainstream Media?</title>
			<itunes:title>Good Riddance To Mainstream Media?</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20091103_specials_iq2edit.mp3%2316686/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20091103_specials_iq2edit.mp3#16686</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529db</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529db</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9z5s4IG9mYsVx9KLiecaBdRdHwjfTs3QntoEELxIFBJlDHgPwhGcCYEVL4mGTYFCs0Bv1D02AYirzTQPDW/AvyFA==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle>As newspapers go under, the network newscasts lose viewers and the mainstream media in general see more and more of their audience shift online, are we as a society better or worse off? A panel of experts debates.</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As newspapers go under, the network newscasts lose viewers and the mainstream media in general see more and more of their audience shift online, are we as a society better or worse off? A panel of experts debates.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>As newspapers go under, the network newscasts lose viewers and the mainstream media in general see more and more of their audience shift online, are we as a society better or worse off? A panel of experts debates.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Will 'Buy American' Policies Backfire?]]></title>
			<itunes:title><![CDATA[Will 'Buy American' Policies Backfire?]]></itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration>
			<enclosure url="https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/e/http%3A%2F%2Fnpr.libsynfusion.com%2Fmedia%2Fiq2%2F20090929_specials_iq2.mp3%2316187/media.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://npr.libsynfusion.com/media/iq2/20090929_specials_iq2.mp3#16187</guid>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<link>https://shows.acast.com/intelligence-squared-us-debates/episodes/5de647c2616840572bf529dc</link>
			<acast:episodeId>5de647c2616840572bf529dc</acast:episodeId>
			<acast:showId>5de64768a636582b5a75625f</acast:showId>
			<acast:settings><![CDATA[FYjHyZbXWHZ7gmX8Pp1rmbKbhgrQiwYShz70Q9/ffXZ/Ynvgc/bVSlxbfa1LTdZ/NS0G6+1uBWmuf3KXrHlJ0izxnDClosxN1ZvN1RuhNrla2c1ytvel9fDJd7lSFD9zJzbsrTqwTVFhFsgwfELXJPHiko7g1JyfOh1s+l/0puG/Sihd5iGEIgvyU86lmlLwpugmeJlhBGoaQfy3tiE5iQ==]]></acast:settings>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA["Buy American" provisions included in legislation such as President Obama's stimulus package have touched off a heated debate. A panel of experts argues whether they help or hurt the United States in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:image href="https://assets.pippa.io/shows/5de64768a636582b5a75625f/show-cover.jpg"/>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>"Buy American" provisions included in legislation such as President Obama's stimulus package have touched off a heated debate. A panel of experts argues whether they help or hurt the United States in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></description>
			<itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>"Buy American" provisions included in legislation such as President Obama's stimulus package have touched off a heated debate. A panel of experts argues whether they help or hurt the United States in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.</p><p> </p><p>Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a></p><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>]]></itunes:summary>
		</item>
    	<itunes:category text="News"/>
    	<itunes:category text="Education"/>
    	<itunes:category text="Government"/>
    </channel>
</rss>
